Public key encryption with equality test via hash proof system

2019 ◽  
Vol 795 ◽  
pp. 20-35
Author(s):  
Ming Zeng ◽  
Jie Chen ◽  
Kai Zhang ◽  
Haifeng Qian
2001 ◽  
Vol 8 (37) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald Cramer ◽  
Victor Shoup

We present several new and fairly practical public-key encryption schemes and prove them secure against adaptive chosen ciphertext attack. One scheme is based on Paillier's Decision Composite Residuosity (DCR) assumption, while another is based in the classical Quadratic Residuosity (QR) assumption. The analysis is in the standard cryptographic model, i.e., the security of our schemes does not rely on the Random Oracle model.<br /> <br />We also introduce the notion of a universal hash proof system. Essentially, this is a special kind of non-interactive zero-knowledge proof system for an NP language. We do not show that universal hash proof systems exist for all NP languages, but we do show how to construct very efficient universal hash proof systems for a general class of group-theoretic language membership problems.<br /> <br />Given an efficient universal hash proof system for a language with certain natural cryptographic indistinguishability properties, we show how to construct an efficient public-key encryption schemes secure against adaptive chosen ciphertext attack in the standard model. Our construction only uses the universal hash proof system as a primitive: no other primitives are required, although even more efficient encryption schemes can be obtained by using hash functions with appropriate collision-resistance properties. We show how to construct efficient universal hash proof systems for languages related to the DCR and QR assumptions. From these we get corresponding public-key encryption schemes that are secure under these assumptions. We also show that the Cramer-Shoup encryption scheme (which up until now was the only practical encryption scheme that could be proved secure against adaptive chosen ciphertext attack under a reasonable assumption, namely, the Decision Diffie-Hellman assumption) is also a special case of our general theory.


2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (3/4) ◽  
pp. 216
Author(s):  
Chengyu Hu ◽  
Zuoxia Yu ◽  
Rupeng Yang ◽  
Qiuliang Xu ◽  
Yongbin Zhou ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 500 ◽  
pp. 15-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyung Tae Lee ◽  
San Ling ◽  
Jae Hong Seo ◽  
Huaxiong Wang

2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (1) ◽  
pp. 313-335
Author(s):  
Rashad Elhabob ◽  
Yanan Zhao ◽  
Alzubair Hassan ◽  
Hu Xiong

2016 ◽  
Vol 59 (11) ◽  
pp. 1689-1694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyung Tae Lee ◽  
San Ling ◽  
Jae Hong Seo ◽  
Huaxiong Wang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document