The evolving nature of open innovation governance: A study of a digital platform development in collaboration with a big science centre

Technovation ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 102370
Author(s):  
Angelo Cavallo ◽  
Henri Burgers ◽  
Antonio Ghezzi ◽  
Vareska van de Vrande
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (1) ◽  
pp. 16943
Author(s):  
Angelo Cavallo ◽  
Henri Burgers ◽  
Antonio Ghezzi ◽  
Vareska Van De Vrande

2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 341-354
Author(s):  
Ove Granstrand

Abstract This paper theorizes about innovation governance, especially about governance of open innovation and the nature and role of IPRs. A reinterpretation of open innovation is offered in terms of the emergence of various types of markets for inputs to and outputs from innovative activities. These open innovation markets are typically markets for ideas, technologies, knowledge and data such as licensing markets, equity markets, and matching markets for innovation collaborations and correspond to various types of open innovation strategies viewed from the inside out in a focal firm's perspective. Open innovation – seen as a set of quasi-integrated organizational forms for innovative activities in between market and hierarchical firm organizations – is then explainable in terms of determinants of supply and demand. Intellectual property rights (IPRs) then play a new role as tools for innovation governance, thereby economizing on governance costs in an extended transaction cost framework. Licensing of usage rights is key to using IPRs for innovation governance. The by now standard property rights approach to rights in intellectual resources has to be challenged, however, and referred to as ‘intellectual rights’ rather than IPRs. In addition, the governing role of IPRs can be improved by combining them with liabilities into a hybrid approach. Organizational responsibilities provide still another institutional arrangement for innovation governance, and integration of rights, liabilities and responsibilities provide a new theoretical perspective on innovation governance – a perspective that also can provide links between organization theory, transaction cost economics and property rights theory.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 02007
Author(s):  
Elena M. Razinkina

The article presents main approaches to building a model of a digital university based on Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, a functional model called Digital University and a short description of its base elements: creation of a digital platform, development of a system of digital models of educational programs and a scientific product, digitalization of the life cycle of educational and scientific products and services of a university, methodological and legal support of the Digital University model.


Author(s):  
Beverly WAGNER ◽  
Nuša FAIN ◽  
Niel KAY ◽  
Nikola VUKASINOVIC

In this paper, we explore the possible boundaries of open innovation by looking at the properties and problems associated with various forms of governance which all have claims to be regarded as open innovation. We look first at some basic forms of open innovation governance before looking at the case of a relatively neglected but increasingly important variant, bespoke or customised innovation. We discuss the implications before finishing with some tentative conclusions.


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexey Bereznoy ◽  
Dirk Meissner ◽  
Veronica Scuotto

PurposeGenerally, there is a common sense to consider knowledge sharing and creation as two separate processes but a new matter emerges when those processes are intertwining. In this vein, this research aims to discuss on the lens of the open innovation (OI) model how such intertwining generates digital platform-based ecosystem.Design/methodology/approachThe theoretical approach is used to largely discuss the intertwining of knowledge sharing and creation in the current digital era. It debates such scenario considering past and present studies and suggests future research streamlines.FindingsIt offers a new theoretical model that can be implemented in a micro, meso and macro level where the concept of “ba” (or ba-sho) assumes the form of a digital platform where knowledge sharing is in motion and dynamically interacts with the knowledge creation.Originality/valueBy discussing the intertwining of knowledge creation and sharing in OI context along with digital trends (e.g. platform innovation ecosystems and platform innovation management), the study offers a new conceptual framework that relies on such intertwining accompanied by the concept of “ba – sho.” In this vein, research limits and new research are suggested to demonstrate and support this conceptual study.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document