scholarly journals The efficacy and safety of antibodies targeting PD-1 for treatment in advanced esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 101083
Author(s):  
Yao Lu ◽  
Lulu Guan ◽  
Mengli Xu ◽  
Feng Wang
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yao Lu ◽  
Mengli Xu ◽  
Lulu Guan ◽  
Yalan Yang ◽  
Yu Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy has recently changed the first-line treatment of several cancers. We perform a systematic meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy for first-line treatment in advanced esophageal cancer.Methods: Data were collected from eligible studies searched from PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, American society of clinical oncology (ASCO) and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). Pooled hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), pooled odds ratio (OR) for objective response rate (ORR) and treatment-related adverse effects (TrAEs) were estimated to assess the efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy. We performed several subgroup analyses to explore the variables on immunotherapy efficacy for esophageal cancer. The five-point Jadad scoring system and the bias risk assessment were used to evaluate the quality of studies, and sensitivity analyses were carried out to evaluate the robustness of the combined outcomes. Results: Seven records involving 3754 participants were selected in our study. Compared to chemotherapy group, the OS (HR=0.72; 95% CI: 0.66-0.78, P<0.01), PFS (HR=0.62; 95% CI: 0.57-0.68, P<0.01) and ORR (OR=2.07; 95% CI: 1.76-2.43, P<0.01) were significantly longer in PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy group. The overall survival benefit was observed in patients regardless of histology or PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS). OS and PFS were generally consistent across subgroups by clinical features. In safety analyses, PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy had significantly higher incidence of TrAEs (OR=1.85; 95% CI: 1.21-2.84, P<0.01), but there was no statistical difference in grade 3 or higher TrAEs (OR=1.24; 95% CI: 1.00-1.55, P=0.05).Conclusion: Compared with chemotherapy, PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy has an improvement of anti-tumor activity and controllable TrAEs for first-line treatment of advanced esophageal cancer.


2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Wang ◽  
Yao Lu ◽  
Xiangrui Meng ◽  
Qingxia Fan

Abstract   Systemic chemotherapy is the first choice for patients with advanced esophageal cancer. However, due to drug resistance and dose-limiting toxicity, a large number of patients in China have not been treated. A novel therapy based on programed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors has been proved to be effective in advanced esophageal cancer.This article is a meta-analysis aiming to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with esophageal cancer. Methods Data were collected from eligible studies searched from PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated to assess the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors versus chemotherapy, and pooled odds ratio (OR) was calculated for objective response rate (ORR). The analysis among patients tested with different PD-1 status was also performed to figure out the relationship between PD-1 status and efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy. The OR for occurrence of treatment-related adverse effect was calculated to assess the safety of anti-PD-1 therapy. Results A total of 8 studies were analyzed. Compared with patients with chemotherapy, patients with anti-PD-1 therapy had a significant improvement in OS (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.70–0.91, P = 0.001), but no significant relationship was observed in ORR (HR = 1.87, 95% CI: 0.82–4.25, P = 0.13) and PFS (HR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.70–1.26, P = 0.67). A similar result was observed in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The PD-L1 status has no obvious connection with the efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy. The incidence of grade 3 to 5 treatment-related adverse effect(AE) in anti-PD-1therapy was distinctly lower than that in chemotherapy, but there is no statistical difference in all treatment-related AE. Conclusion Anti-PD-1 therapy significantly prolonged the OS when compared with chemotherapy, while no significantly difference in PFS and ORR for the population of esophageal cancer, ESCC, PD-L1 positive. Based on the analysis of grade 3 to 5 treatment-related adverse effect events, a lower risk was associated with the anti-PD-1 therapy versus chemotherapy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 147 ◽  
pp. 169-177
Author(s):  
Benedek Tinusz ◽  
Alexandra Soós ◽  
Péter Hegyi ◽  
Patrícia Sarlós ◽  
László Szapáry ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 110 ◽  
pp. S736-S737
Author(s):  
Andrea C. Rodriguez ◽  
Andrew Lai ◽  
Ashok Shiani ◽  
Seth Lipka ◽  
Huafeng Shen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yao Lu ◽  
Lulu Guan ◽  
Mengli Xu ◽  
Feng Wang

Abstract Background: A novel therapy based on programed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors has been proved to be effective in advanced esophageal cancer. This article is a meta-analysis aiming to compare the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 therapy with chemotherapy in esophageal cancer.Patients and methods: Data were collected from eligible studies searched from PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) was estimated to assess the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors versus chemotherapy. The subgroup analysis were also performed to evaluate the OS benefits. The OR for occurrence of treatment-related adverse effect was calculated to assess the safety of anti-PD-1 therapy.Results: A total of 4 studies were analyzed. Compared with patients with chemotherapy, patients with anti-PD-1 therapy had a significant improvement in OS (HR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.71-0.88, P<0.001), but no significant relationship was observed in PFS (HR=0.96, 95% CI: 0.76-1.20, P=0.69) and ORR (OR=1.92, 95% CI: 0.98-3.72, P=0.06). A similar result was observed in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The significant predictor for treatment benefit with combination therapy versus chemotherapy alone were histology (P=0.009). The incidence of grade 3 to 5 treatment-related adverse effect in anti-PD-1 therapy was distinctly lower than that in chemotherapy, but there is no statistical difference in all treatment-related adverse effect.Conclusion: Anti-PD-1 therapy significantly prolonged the OS, simultaneously lowered grade 3 to 5 treatment-related adverse effect versus chemotherapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document