scholarly journals Illusory motion reversal is caused by rivalry, not by perceptual snapshots of the visual field

2004 ◽  
Vol 44 (23) ◽  
pp. 2653-2658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith Kline ◽  
Alex O. Holcombe ◽  
David M. Eagleman
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Yousef

This article provides evidence that motion has the ability to stably fuse two different colored ‘spatially separated’ stimuli without impairments against the shape of those separated stimuli. Based on our observations, dilated pupils promote colours fusion; and the optimal fusion happens when the stimuli are moving in opposite direction of the actual physical motion, namely, when there is illusory motion reversal. The previous observations suggested that retinal peripheries have main contributions on the present illusion which we called; motion induced colours fusion ‘MICF’ illusion.


2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 317-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuhiro Takeshima ◽  
Jiro Gyoba

Several studies have examined the effects of auditory stimuli on visual perception. In studies of cross-modal correspondences, auditory pitch has been shown to modulate visual motion perception. In particular, low-reliability visual motion stimuli tend to be affected by metaphorically or physically congruent or incongruent sounds. In the present study, we examined the modulatory effects of auditory pitch on visual perception of motion trajectory for visual inputs of varying reliability. Our results indicated that an auditory pitch implying the illusory motion toward the outside of the visual field-modulated perceived motion trajectory. In contrast, auditory pitch implying the illusory motion toward the central visual field did not affect the perception of motion trajectory. This asymmetrical effect of auditory stimuli occurred depending on the reliability of the visual input. Moreover, sounds that corresponded in terms of their pitch-elevation mapping altered the perception of the trajectory of visual motion when apparent motion could be perceived smoothly. Therefore, the present results demonstrate that auditory stimuli modulate visual motion perception especially when smooth motion is perceived in the peripheral visual field.


2005 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 559-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex O. Holcombe ◽  
Colin W.G. Clifford ◽  
David M. Eagleman ◽  
Pooya Pakarian

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Yousef

This article provides evidence that the retinal peripheries generate motion reversal perception. Restricted access of the light rays to retinal peripheries due to pupil constriction is found to significantly limit the perception of motion reversal. We used unfolded stimulus, namely, a linear stimulus instead one a radial one to easily validate our theory.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Michael Thornton ◽  
Sunčica Zdravković

In a series of four experiments, standard visual search was used to explore whether the onset of illusory motion preattentively guides vision in the same way that the onset of real-motion is known to do. Participants searched for target stimuli based on Akiyoshi Kitaoka’s classic illusions, configured so that they either did or did not give the subjective impression of illusory motion. Distractor items always contained the same elements as target items, but did not convey a sense of illusory motion. When target items contained illusory motion, they popped-out, with flat search slopes that were independent of set size. Search for control items without illusory motion -- but with identical structural differences to distractors -- was slow and serial in nature (> 200 ms/item). Using a nulling task, we estimated the speed of illusory rotation in our displays to be approximately 2°/s. Direct comparison of illusory and real-motion targets moving with matched velocity showed that illusory motion targets were detected more quickly. Blurred target items, that conveyed a weak subjective impression of illusory motion, gave rise to serial, but faster (< 100 ms/item) search than control items. Our behavioral findings of parallel detection across the visual field, together with previous imaging and neurophysiological studies, suggests that relatively early cortical areas play a causal role in the perception of illusory motion. Furthermore, we hope to reemphasize the way in which visual search can be used as a flexible, objective measure of illusion strength.


2006 ◽  
Vol 46 (6-7) ◽  
pp. 1158-1159 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.A. Kline ◽  
A.O. Holcombe ◽  
D.M. Eagleman

Perception ◽  
10.1068/p3336 ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 1147-1151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norman D Cook ◽  
Takefumi Hayashi ◽  
Toshihiko Amemiya ◽  
Kimihiro Suzuki ◽  
Lorenz Leumann

The ‘reverse-perspective’ illusion entails the apparent motion of a stationary scene painted in relief and containing misleading depth cues. We have found that, using prism goggles to induce horizontal or vertical visual-field reversals, the illusory motion is greatly reduced or eliminated in the direction for which the goggles reverse the visual field. We argue that the illusion is a consequence of the observer's inability to reconcile changes in visual information due to body movement with implicit knowledge concerning anticipated changes. As such, the reverse-perspective illusion may prove to be useful in the study of the integration of linear perspective and motion parallax information.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Chun Hsu ◽  
Chun-I Yeh ◽  
Jian-Jia Huang ◽  
Chang-Hung Hung ◽  
Chou Po Hung ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith A. Kline ◽  
David M. Eagleman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document