scholarly journals Motion Induced Colours Fusion

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Yousef

This article provides evidence that motion has the ability to stably fuse two different colored ‘spatially separated’ stimuli without impairments against the shape of those separated stimuli. Based on our observations, dilated pupils promote colours fusion; and the optimal fusion happens when the stimuli are moving in opposite direction of the actual physical motion, namely, when there is illusory motion reversal. The previous observations suggested that retinal peripheries have main contributions on the present illusion which we called; motion induced colours fusion ‘MICF’ illusion.

2005 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 559-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex O. Holcombe ◽  
Colin W.G. Clifford ◽  
David M. Eagleman ◽  
Pooya Pakarian

2004 ◽  
Vol 44 (23) ◽  
pp. 2653-2658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith Kline ◽  
Alex O. Holcombe ◽  
David M. Eagleman

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Yousef

This article provides evidence that the retinal peripheries generate motion reversal perception. Restricted access of the light rays to retinal peripheries due to pupil constriction is found to significantly limit the perception of motion reversal. We used unfolded stimulus, namely, a linear stimulus instead one a radial one to easily validate our theory.


Perception ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter C Gogel ◽  
Bernard W Griffin

Induced motion is not limited to continuous motions presented on a frontoparallel plane. Experiments were conducted to investigate several varieties of induced motion to which theories of induced motion must apply. The observer indicated the perceived path of motion of a vertically moving test point to which induced motion at right angles to the physical motion was added by the motion of two inducing points. In experiment 1 all motions (both apparently and physically) were in a frontoparallel plane. It was found that discrete displacement as well as continuous motion of the test and inducing points produced substantial amounts of induction. In experiment 2 the inducing points were continuously moved in stereoscopic distance rather than remaining in an apparent frontoparallel plane. A large amount of apparent motion in depth was found in the vertically moving test point and was interpreted as an induced motion in depth. In experiment 3 an alternative interpretation of the phenomenon of experiment 2, in terms of an apparent vergence for the two images of the test point, was investigated and found to be unlikely. In experiment 4, with all the points moving continuously in a frontoparallel plane, eye motions as well as induced motions were measured, with the observer fixating either the test point or an inducing point. Substantial amounts of induction were obtained under both conditions of fixation. The consequences of these findings for theories of induced motion are discussed.


i-Perception ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 204166952095802
Author(s):  
Michael Bach ◽  
Lea Atala-Gérard

The Rotating Snakes illusion is a motion illusion based on repeating, asymmetric luminance patterns. Recently, we found certain gray-value conditions where a weak illusory motion occurs in the opposite direction. Of the four models for explaining the illusion, one also explains the unexpected perceived opposite direction.We here present a simple new model, without free parameters, based on an array of standard correlation-type motion detectors with a subsequent nonlinearity (e.g., saturation) before summing the detector outputs. The model predicts (a) the pattern-appearance motion illusion for steady fixation, (b) an illusion under the real-world situation of saccades across or near the pattern (pattern shift), (c) a relative maximum of illusory motion for the same gray values where it is found psychophysically, and (d) the opposite illusion for certain luminance values. We submit that the new model’s sparseness of assumptions justifies adding a fifth model to explain this illusion.


1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 388-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jody C. Culham ◽  
Sean P. Dukelow ◽  
Tutis Vilis ◽  
Frank A. Hassard ◽  
Joseph S. Gati ◽  
...  

Culham, Jody C., Sean P. Dukelow, Tutis Vilis, Frank A. Hassard, Joseph S. Gati, Ravi S. Menon, and Melvyn A. Goodale. Recovery of fMRI activation in motion area MT following storage of the motion aftereffect. J. Neurophysiol. 81: 388–393, 1999. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during storage of the motion aftereffect (MAE) to examine the relationship between motion perception and neural activity in the human cortical motion complex MT+ (including area MT and adjacent motion-selective cortex). MT+ responds not only to physical motion but also to illusory motion, as in the MAE when subjects who have adapted to continuous motion report that a subsequent stationary test stimulus appears to move in the opposite direction. In the phenomenon of storage, the total decay time of the MAE is extended by inserting a dark period between adaptation and test phases. That is, when the static test pattern is presented after a storage period equal in duration to the normal MAE, the illusory motion reappears for almost as long as the original effect despite the delay. We examined fMRI activation in MT+ during and after storage. Seven subjects viewed continuous motion, followed either by an undelayed stationary test (immediate MAE) or by a completely dark storage interval preceding the test (stored MAE). Like the perceptual effect, activity in MT+ dropped during the storage interval then rebounded to reach a level much higher than after the same delay without storage. Although MT+ activity was slightly enhanced during the storage period following adaptation to continuous motion (compared with a control sequence in which the adaptation grating oscillated and no MAE was perceived), this enhancement was much less than that observed during the perceptual phenomenon. These results indicate that following adaptation, activity in MT+ is pronounced only with the presentation of an appropriate visual stimulus, during which the MAE is perceived.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Bach ◽  
Lea Atala-Gérard

AbstractThe Rotating Snakes illusion is a motion illusion based on repeating, asymmetric luminance patterns. Recently, we found certain grey-value conditions where a weak, illusory motion occurs in the opposite direction. Of the four models for explaining the illusion, one (Backus and Oruç, 2005) also explains the unexpected perceived opposite direction. We here present a simple new model, without free parameters, based on an array of standard correlation-type motion detectors with a subsequent non-linearity (e.g., saturation) before summing the detector outputs. The model predicts (1) the pattern-appearance motion illusion for steady fixation, (2) an illusion under the real-world situation of saccades across or near the pattern (pattern shift), (3) a relative maximum of illusory motion for the same grey values where it is found psychophysically, and (4) the inverse illusion for certain luminance values. We submit that the model’s sparseness of assumptions justifies adding a fifth model to explain this illusion.


Author(s):  
Jasmin Léveillé ◽  
Arash Yazdanbakhsh

Induced motion is the perception of an illusory motion component in one object or stimulus element due to the presence of another object moving truly in the opposite direction. The phenomenon has been known for several centuries, having been reported in both natural scenes and reproduced in laboratory experiments. Despite the ubiquity of induced motion, attempts to explain the phenomenon have generally revolved around very few principles. Foremost among these is the notion of object-centered reference frame, which stipulates that the visual system encodes objects relative to each other rather than in absolute coordinates relative to an observer. This chapter discusses this phenomenon.


2006 ◽  
Vol 46 (6-7) ◽  
pp. 1158-1159 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.A. Kline ◽  
A.O. Holcombe ◽  
D.M. Eagleman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document