Recruited Minced Skin Grafting for Improving the Skin Appearance of the Donor Site of a Split-Thickness Skin Graft

Patients with Werner’s syndrome frequently develop chronic leg ulcers that heal poorly. We present a patient who suffered from this rare syndrome and developed typical heel ulcers. Treatment of the ulcer is challenging, as flap options are limited over the lower third of the leg and skin grafting is not easy as there is a lack of healthy granulations. We successfully treated the ulcer with osteomyelitis by drilling the bone and applying an ultrathin split thickness skin graft with the thigh skin as the donor site.

Download Full-text

Recruited Minced Skin Grafting for Improving the Skin Appearance of the Donor Site of a Split-Thickness Skin Graft

Dermatologic Surgery ◽

10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02266.x ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 38 (4) ◽

pp. 654-660 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

Ruka Simizu ◽

Kazuo Kishi ◽

Keisuke Okabe ◽

Yumiko Uchikawa ◽

Yoshiaki Sakamoto ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Skin Graft ◽

Donor Site ◽

Skin Grafting ◽

Split Thickness Skin Graft ◽

Thickness Skin

Download Full-text

The role of recruited minced skin grafting in improving the quality of healing at the donor site of split-thickness skin graft—A comparative study

Burns ◽

10.1016/j.burns.2018.11.018 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 45 (4) ◽

pp. 923-928 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Radharaman ◽

Parmod Kumar ◽

Ajai K.S. ◽

Ramesh Kumar Sharma

Keyword(s):

Comparative Study ◽

Skin Graft ◽

Donor Site ◽

Skin Grafting ◽

Split Thickness Skin Graft ◽

Thickness Skin

Download Full-text

Regrafting of the Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor-Site: Is It Beneficial?

Journal of Burn Care & Research ◽

10.1093/jbcr/irz166 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Catherine M Legemate ◽

Ymke Lucas ◽

Irma M M H Oen ◽

Cornelis H Van Der Vlies

Keyword(s):

Skin Graft ◽

Donor Site ◽

Skin Grafting ◽

Split Thickness Skin Graft ◽

Split Skin Graft ◽

Thickness Skin ◽

Split Skin Grafting ◽

Split Thickness Skin Grafting ◽

Graft Donor ◽

Split Skin

Abstract Split-thickness skin grafting remains a fundamental treatment for patients with deep burns and other traumatic injuries. Unfortunately, the donor site wound that remains after split skin graft (SSG) harvesting may also cause problems for the patient; they can lead to discomfort and scars with a poor cosmetic outcome. Regrafting of the donor site is one of the methods described to improve donor site healing and scarring. In this report, we describe a case of a 26-year-old woman with a self-inflicted chemical burn (0.5% TBSA) who underwent split skin grafting. During surgery, only part of the donor site was regrafted with split skin graft remnants. This part healed faster and had a better scar quality at 3 months postsurgery. Nevertheless, the appearance and patients’ opinion on the regrafted part deteriorated after 12 months. With this case report, we aim to create awareness of the long-term consequences of regrafting, which may differ from short-time results. Patients expected to have poor reepithelialization potential may benefit from regrafting of the SSG on the donor site. But in healthy young individuals, timewise there would be no benefit since it can lead to an aesthetically displeasing result.

Download Full-text

Tumescent non-tumescent technique for split thickness skin graft harvesting

International Surgery Journal ◽

10.18203/2349-2902.isj20185038 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 5 (12) ◽

pp. 4026

Author(s):

M. K. Rajendran

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Skin Graft ◽

Donor Site ◽

Skin Grafting ◽

Split Thickness Skin Graft ◽

Skin Grafts ◽

Recipient Site ◽

Tumescent Technique ◽

Graft Take ◽

Thickness Skin

Background: Split-thickness skin graft failures can be attributed to flaws in the recipient bed which has to be well prepared. Tissues with limited blood supply such as bone, tendons, cartilage or sites with necrotic tissue or infection do not accept skin grafts. Adrenaline is used to harvest skin grafts due to its vasoconstriction effect which limits blood loss. The aim of our study was to determine skin graft take after tumescent technique compared to a non-tumescent technique for harvesting.Methods: Two treatment groups of patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned. Forty patients underwent split-thickness skin graft harvesting with tumescent technique and forty patients underwent non-tumescent split-thickness skin graft harvesting. The recipient site was opened in both groups on the fifth day after surgery and take rate assessed. The donor site was assessed on day ten and if not healed, followed up for three weeks.Results: There was a statistically significant association between skin graft take rate and skin grafting technique (p=0.011). The mean graft take rate was 2.5% higher in the tumescent group compared to the non-tumescent group (96.3% compared to 94%). On day 10, there was no difference in percentage healing of donor sites between the tumescent and non-tumescent groups, p=0.562.Conclusions: Tumescent technique significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss. It is safe, inexpensive and easy to use. The subdermal adrenaline/saline injection creates a smooth, dense surface which assists debridement and donor harvesting.

Download Full-text

Improving Outcomes in Anterolateral Thigh Flap Donor-Site Reconstruction Using Propeller Flaps: A Retrospective Comparative Study with Skin Grafting

Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery ◽

10.1055/s-0040-1718550 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Domenico Pagliara ◽

Maria Lucia Mangialardi ◽

Stefano Vitagliano ◽

Valentina Pino ◽

Marzia Salgarello

Keyword(s):

Comparative Study ◽

Skin Graft ◽

Donor Site ◽

Split Thickness Skin Graft ◽

Tactile Sensitivity ◽

Aesthetic Outcome ◽

Propeller Flap ◽

Thickness Skin ◽

Anterolateral Thigh ◽

Alt Flap

Abstract Background After anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap harvesting, skin graft of the donor site is commonly performed. When the defect width exceeds 8 cm or 16% of thigh circumference, it can determine lower limb function impairment and poor aesthetic outcomes. In our comparative study, we assessed the functional and aesthetic outcomes related to ALT donor-site closure with split-thickness skin graft compared with thigh propeller flap. Methods We enrolled 60 patients with ALT flap donor sites. We considered two groups of ALT donor-site reconstructions: graft group (30 patients) with split-thickness skin graft and flap group (30 patients) with local perforator-based propeller flap. We assessed for each patient the range of motion (ROM) at the hip and knee, tension, numbness, paresthesia, tactile sensitivity, and gait. Regarding the impact on daily life activities, patients completed the lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) questionnaire. Patient satisfaction for aesthetic outcome was obtained with a 5-point Likert scale (from very poor to excellent). Results In the propeller flap group, the ROMs of hip and knee and the LEFS score were significantly higher. At 12-month follow-up, in the graft group, 23 patients reported tension, 19 numbness, 16 paresthesia, 22 reduction of tactile sensitivity, and 5 alteration of gait versus only 5 patients experienced paresthesia and 7 reduction of tactile sensitivity in the propeller flap group. The satisfaction for aesthetic outcome was significantly higher in the propeller flap group. Conclusion In high-tension ALT donor-site closure, the propeller perforator flap should always be considered to avoid split-thickness skin graft with related functional and aesthetic poor results.

Download Full-text

Reconstruction of a secondary scalp defect using the crane principle and a split-thickness skin graft

BMC Surgery ◽

10.1186/s12893-021-01056-y ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Yi Lu ◽

Ke-Chung Chang ◽

Che-Ning Chang ◽

Dun-Hao Chang

Keyword(s):

Skin Graft ◽

Subcutaneous Tissue ◽

Donor Site ◽

Split Thickness Skin Graft ◽

Salvage Procedure ◽

Primary Defect ◽

Scalp Defects ◽

Thickness Skin ◽

Scalp Defect ◽

Secondary Defect

Abstract Background Scalp reconstruction is a common challenge for surgeons, and there are many different treatment choices. The “crane principle” is a technique that temporarily transfers a scalp flap to the defect to deposit subcutaneous tissue. The flap is then returned to its original location, leaving behind a layer of soft tissue that is used to nourish a skin graft. Decades ago, it was commonly used for forehead scalp defects, but this useful technique has been seldom reported on in recent years due to the improvement of microsurgical techniques. Previous reports mainly used the crane principle for the primary defects, and here we present a case with its coincidental application to deal with a complication of a secondary defect. Case report We present a case of a 75-year-old female patient with a temporoparietal scalp squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). After tumor excision, the primary defect was reconstructed using a transposition flap and the donor site was covered by a split-thickness skin graft (STSG). Postoperatively, the occipital skin graft was partially lost resulting in skull bone exposure. For this secondary defect, we applied the crane principle to the previously rotated flap as a salvage procedure and skin grafting to the original tumor location covered by a viable galea fascia in 1.5 months. Both the flap and skin graft healed uneventfully. Conclusions Currently, the crane principle is a little-used technique because of the familiarity of microsurgery. Nevertheless, the concept is still useful in selected cases, especially for the management of previous flap complications.

Download Full-text