Moving towards shared decision making in the physician-patient encounter in France: State of the art and future prospects

2017 ◽  
Vol 123-124 ◽  
pp. 41-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nora Moumjid ◽  
Julien Carretier ◽  
Giovanna Marsico ◽  
François Blot ◽  
Christine Durif-Bruckert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Patient Encounter ◽  
Future Prospects ◽  
Physician Patient

Shared decision making in the physician-patient encounter in France: a general overview in 2011

2011 ◽  
Vol 105 (4) ◽  
pp. 259-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nora Moumjid ◽  
Christine Durif-Bruckert ◽  
Véronique Denois-Régnier ◽  
Pauline Roux ◽  
Fanny Soum-Pouyalet
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Patient Encounter ◽  
General Overview ◽  
Physician Patient

Prudence in Shared Decision-Making: The Missing Link between the “Technically Correct” and the “Morally Good” in Medical Decision-Making

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Muleli Kioko ◽  
Pablo Requena Meana
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Patient Autonomy ◽  
Intellectual Ability ◽  
Medical Decision ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Physician Patient Relationship ◽  
Good Healing ◽  
The Right ◽  
Physician Patient

Abstract Shared Decision-Making is a widely accepted model of the physician–patient relationship providing an ethical environment in which physician beneficence and patient autonomy are respected. It acknowledges the moral responsibility of physician and patient by promoting a deliberative collaboration in which their individual expertise—complementary in nature, equal in importance—is emphasized, and personal values and preferences respected. Its goal coincides with Pellegrino and Thomasma’s proximate end of medicine, that is, a technically correct and morally good healing decision for and with a particular patient. We argue that by perfecting the intellectual ability to apprehend the complexity of clinical situations, and through a perfection of the application of the first principles of practical reason, prudence is able to point toward the right and good shared medical decision. A prudent shared medical decision is therefore always in keeping with the kind of person the physician and the patient have chosen to be.

scholarly journals Shared Decision Making

2021 ◽  
Vol 02 (01) ◽  
pp. 111-117
Author(s):  
Wei Wang
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Emergency Management ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Significant Potential

Shared decision making (SDM) is a process by which physicians and patients jointly participate in choosing to pursue one of several alternatives in a clinical decision. It is most relevant for decisions that involve significant potential harms and benefits with tradeoffs and uncertainty. This paper provides a state-of-the-art review about SDM covering its concept, value, implementation and application in emergency management and communication. SDM is valuable in the process of making decisions which patients may benefit most from, thus resulting in satisfying patient-centered outcomes. Although SDM can be challenging to incorporate into clinical practice, it is likely to become a useful tool of communication in future.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document