scholarly journals Prediction of functional recovery in patients with chronic coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction combining the evaluation of myocardial perfusion and of contractile reserve using nitrate-enhanced technetium-99m sestamibi gated single-photon emission computed tomography and Dobutamine stress

2001 ◽  
Vol 87 (12) ◽  
pp. 1346-1350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Leoncini ◽  
Gabriella Marcucci ◽  
Roberto Sciagrà ◽  
Fabio Frascarelli ◽  
Ignazio Simonetti ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T M Stokke ◽  
S I Sarvari ◽  
A W Bjerring ◽  
K H Haugaa ◽  
M T Elahi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Clinical treatment strategies are often based on measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). There is limited evidence about variations in LVEF when measured by different imaging modalities. Purpose To investigate the intermodality variability of LVEF measured by two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE), three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE), cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods Patients from a multicenter study (DOPPLER-CIP – Determining optimal noninvasive parameters for the prediction of left ventricular remodeling in chronic ischemic patients) with chronic CAD were included. LVEF was measured by CMR and at least one additional modality. In each modality, LVEF was measured by a core laboratory independently of the other modalities. Measurements of LVEF by CMR were compared to 2DE, 3DE and SPECT using correlation and Bland-Altman plots. Results A total of 343 patients were included. Mean age was 63.9±8.3 years and 253 (74%) were males. Mean LVEF by CMR was 61.8±11.6%. Correlations between CMR LVEF and other modalities were moderate for 2DE and 3DE, and good for SPECT (Figure A-C). CMR had significantly greater correlation to SPECT, compared to 2DE and 3DE. Bland-Altman plots indicated relatively wide limits of agreement between all modalities, ranging from 31% to 42% (Figure, D-F). Mean absolute difference of LVEF between CMR and other modalities were 8.5% for 2DE, 9.0% for 3DE, and 8.3% for SPECT. The percentage of measurements that fell within a range of 5% difference compared to CMR LVEF was 41% for 2DE, 34% for 3DE and 37% for SPECT (all p>0.05). Conclusions In a multicenter study with chronic CAD patients, LVEF assessed by CMR had better correlation to SPECT, compared to 2DE and 3DE. However, there was considerable variability among all three modalities that were compared to CMR. Awareness of these variations are important in clinical management.


Author(s):  
Upasana Tayal ◽  
Sanjay Prasad ◽  
Tjeerd Germans ◽  
Albert C. van Rossum

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is characterized by enlargement of the heart with associated reduced left ventricular function. From an imaging perspective, important requirements are to exclude other pathologies, assess disease severity, guide therapeutic management, and identify complications. Establishing the imaging diagnosis of DCM is key to guiding the management of DCM. In this chapter we discuss how to use imaging to make an accurate diagnosis of DCM, and review how to exclude coronary artery disease (CAD) and valvular disease as these are two important differentials with differing management strategies. We then review the diagnostic and prognostic capabilities of echocardiography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and nuclear techniques including single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) in DCM, with a focus on where imaging can identify particular causes of DCM.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document