Lower extremity revascularization with in situ saphenous vein for critical ischemia

1988 ◽  
Vol 155 (5) ◽  
pp. 701-703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milton H. Brinton ◽  
Christopher Stahler ◽  
Gerald Gibbons
2000 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-123
Author(s):  
Kiran Bhirangi ◽  
James C. Lynch ◽  
Christopher Stahler ◽  
Milton H. Brinton ◽  
Larry W. Kraiss

Radiology ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 170 (3) ◽  
pp. 1023-1027 ◽  
Author(s):  
K W Sniderman ◽  
P G Kalman ◽  
J Shewchun ◽  
R E Goldberg

1987 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 687-692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred A. Weaver ◽  
C. Robert Barlow ◽  
William H. Edwards ◽  
Joseph L. Mulherin ◽  
Judith M. Jenkins

VASA ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fransson ◽  
Thörne

Background: This prospective study compares results of infrainguinal revascularisation with autologous vein in diabetic and non-diabetic populations. Patients and methods: 101 patients (diabetics (A) n = 50 and non-diabetics (B) n = 51) were operated upon with an in situ saphenous vein bypass to the popliteal artery below knee or to crural arteries, due to critical ischemia. Data on operative details, morbidity, mortality, secondary interventions and graft patency, were collected prospectively. All patients were followed up for 5 years. Results: The two groups were similar except that diabetics more often suffered from gangrene or tissue loss. The distal anastomoses were constructed significantly more distally in diabetics. There were no differences in perioperative bleeding, length of operation, hospital stay or 30 d mortality. The 5 year patency did not differ significantly between groups, A 68 % vs. B 72 %. The limb salvage was equal in both groups, 86 % after 5 years. Mortality during follow up was significantly higher among diabetics, at two years A 31 % vs. B 14 %. Conclusions: Distal revascularisation with in situ technique is a durable procedure that can be performed with very good results in both diabetics and non-diabetics. The survival among diabetics is however significantly lower, although reaching 69 % at two years.


1994 ◽  
Vol 219 (6) ◽  
pp. 664-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond S. Martin ◽  
William H. Edwards ◽  
Joseph L. Mulherin ◽  
William H. Edwards ◽  
Judith M. Jenkins ◽  
...  

1987 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 687-692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred A. Weaver ◽  
C.Robert Barlow ◽  
William H. Edwards ◽  
Joseph L. Mulherin ◽  
Judith M. Jenkins

2015 ◽  
Vol 96 (6) ◽  
pp. 942-949 ◽  
Author(s):  
N V Krepkogorskiy ◽  
D G Bulatov

Aim. To specify the indications for in situ femoropopliteal (tibial) bypass, to study complications rate immediately after, within 1 and 2 years of the surgery. Methods. The study group included 33 patients with symptoms of critical lower limb ischemia, who underwent femoral-popliteal or femoral-tibial bypass. 4 (12.1%) cases of type C and 29 (87.9%) cases of type D arterial bed lesions according to TASC II classification were revealed after investigation. Patients were followed up for 2 years period. Shunt thrombosis rate, condition of the trophic ulcers, chronic arterial ischemia stage before and after the surgery, mortality, lower limb amputation were measured outcomes. Results. Repeated reconstructions rate for primary shunt thrombosis immediately after surgery was 30.3±8.0%. Shunt thrombosis (secondary) occurred in only three (9.1±5.0%) patients. The main causes which led to the shunt thrombosis during or at the 1st day after the surgery, were absence of intraoperative valvulotomy quality control and presence of unligated great saphenous vein tributaries. Trophic defects healing was observed in 3 (30.0±14.5%) of 10 patients with ulcers immediately after surgery and in all cases (100.0%) by the end of 1 year follow-up. The total number of high-level amputations within 2 years was 25.8±7.9%, the overall mortality rate within 2 years was 6.1±4.2%. Femoral-popliteal or femoral-tibial bypass surgery allowed to preserve the limb in 74.2% of patients within 2 years of follow-up. Bypass patency was preserved in 41.7% of patients out of 24 in situ bypass surgeries for the follow-up time. In our opinion critical limb ischemia with significant and extended arterial bed lesions of D and C types (according to TASC II score) is one of the indications for in situ femoropopliteal (tibial) bypass as for the surgery of the first choice. Endovascular treatment is also impossible for this type of lesion, as alternative surgeries using reversed autovein and synthetic explant do not meet all the requirements for an extended bypass. Conclusion. The lack of adequate intraoperative valvulotomy quality control and presence of unligated great saphenous vein tributaries may be the causes of early postoperative shunt thrombosis; despite the low femoropopliteal (tibial) bypass patency rate in patients with critical ischemia, the surgery was recognized as efficient as it allowed to preserve the limbs in 74.2% of patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. e353
Author(s):  
Heepeel Chang ◽  
Frank Veith ◽  
Neal Cayne ◽  
Caron Rockman ◽  
Glenn Jacobowitz ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document