Hand preference and transcranial magnetic stimulation asymmetry of cortical motor representation

1999 ◽  
Vol 835 (2) ◽  
pp. 324-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. Triggs ◽  
Babu Subramanium ◽  
Fabian Rossi
2004 ◽  
Vol 114 (5) ◽  
pp. 918-922 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph M.W. R??del ◽  
Arno Olthoff ◽  
Frithjof Tergau ◽  
Kristina Simonyan ◽  
Dorit Kraemer ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric P. Bastings ◽  
Jason P. Greenberg ◽  
David C. Good

The respective contributions of the stroke and undamaged hemispheres to motor recovery after stroke remains controversial. The aim of this article is to evaluate the relationship between location and size of cortical motor areas and outcome after stroke. Twelve controls and 12 stroke patients were studied. Hand cortical motor output areas were determined using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Motor-evoked potentials were recorded simultaneously from both hands. Functional motor abilities were evaluated using well-validated measures. Surface area, weighted surface area, and center of gravity of motor output areas were calculated. Different patterns of motor output areas to the paretic hand were observed; there was no motor output from the stroke hemisphere in patients with poor outcome, contrasting to large motor output area in the stroke hemisphere in patients with good outcome, regardless of infarct size or location. A significant correlation was found between measures of motor outcome in the stroke-affected upper extremity and both the surface area and weight of the central motor output area in the stroke hemisphere. No ipsilateral motor response was obtained after stimulation of either hemisphere. These data support an association between preservation of cortical motor output area to the paretic hand in the stroke hemisphere and good motor outcome.


1995 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 245-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leopold J. Streletz ◽  
Jacqueline K. S. Belevich ◽  
Seth M. Jones ◽  
Anju Bhushan ◽  
Suken H. Shah ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (10-11) ◽  
pp. 965-976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tonya L. Rich ◽  
Jeremiah S. Menk ◽  
Kyle D. Rudser ◽  
Timothy Feyma ◽  
Bernadette T. Gillick

Background. Neurorehabilitation interventions in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP) target motor abilities in daily life yet deficits in hand skills persist. Limitations in the less-affected hand may affect overall bimanual hand skills. Objective. To compare hand function, by timed motor performance on the Jebsen-Taylor Test of Hand Function (JTTHF) and grip strength of children with UCP to children with typical development (CTD), aged 8 to 18 years old. Exploratory analyses compared hand function measures with regard to neurophysiological outcomes measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation and between group comparisons of hemispheric motor threshold. Methods. Baseline hand skills were evaluated in 47 children (21 UCP; 26 CTD). Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation testing assessed corticospinal tract and motor threshold. Results. The mean difference of the less-affected hand of children with UCP to the dominant hand of CTD on the JTTHF was 21.4 seconds (95% CI = 9.32-33.46, P = .001). The mean difference in grip strength was −30.8 N (95% CI = −61.9 to 0.31, P = .052). Resting motor thresholds between groups were not significant, but age was significantly associated with resting motor threshold ( P < .001; P = .001). Children with UCP ipsilateral pattern of motor representation demonstrated greater mean differences between hands than children with contralateral pattern of motor representation ( P < .001). All results were adjusted for age and sex. Conclusions. The less-affected hand in children with UCP underperformed the dominant hand of CTD. Limitations were greater in children with UCP ipsilateral motor pattern. Rehabilitation in the less-affected hand may be warranted. Bilateral hand function in future studies may help identify the optimal rehabilitation and neuromodulatory intervention.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael B. Gerber ◽  
Alasdair C. McLean ◽  
Samuel J. Stephen ◽  
Alex G. Chalco ◽  
Usman M. Arshad ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 346 ◽  
pp. 108893 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jusa Reijonen ◽  
Minna Pitkänen ◽  
Elisa Kallioniemi ◽  
Ali Mohammadi ◽  
Risto J. Ilmoniemi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document