Reinterpretation of radiological images of patients with the suspicion of a hepatic, pancreatic or biliary malignancy

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A734-A734
Author(s):  
E TILLEMAN ◽  
O DELDEN ◽  
E RAUWS ◽  
J LAMERIS ◽  
D GOUMA
2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A734
Author(s):  
Esther H.B.M. Tilleman ◽  
Otto M. Delden ◽  
Eric A.J. Rauws ◽  
Johan S. Lameris ◽  
Dirk J. Gouma

1991 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 163
Author(s):  
Hyung Sik Choi ◽  
Kyu Ok Choe ◽  
Jung Ho Suh ◽  
Jong Tae Lee
Keyword(s):  

2000 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 919 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gyu Hyuk Hwang ◽  
Jin Jong You ◽  
In Oak Ahn ◽  
Jae Boem Na ◽  
Sung Hoon Chung

2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. e48.3-e49
Author(s):  
A Sheikh ◽  
M Schramm ◽  
P Carter ◽  
J Russell ◽  
M Liddington ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo describe our technique of using reverse frontal bone graft for FOAR for patients with metopic or coronal synostosis.DesignRetrospective analysis of digital records for operation notes and radiological images.SubjectsSince April 2014, 16 patients underwent FOAR without using orbital bar.MethodsWe plan a frontal bone graft using Marchac template and increase the angles on side by 1 cm. This graft is then reversed and supra orbital margins are drilled out. The orbital bar is then removed and drilled down to make bone dust which is then used to fill gaps on exposed dura. The reversed frontal graft is then placed in front and secured via absorbable sutures, plate and screws.ResultsAll 16 patients who underwent this technique have shown excellent cosmetic results with no complications or non healing. Removing orbital bar does not cause any cosmetic defect since orbital rims are drilled out in reverse frontal bone graft. The removed orbital bar provides an excellent source of bone dust to cover gaps on exposed dura.ConclusionsWe present our technique of FOAR without using orbital bar, which is drilled down to bone dust to fill gaps. This has shown excellent cosmetic results so far with no complications. This addresses the issue of temporal thinning.


Surgery Today ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Takahashi ◽  
Naoki Sasahira ◽  
Takashi Sasaki ◽  
Yosuke Inoue ◽  
Yoshihiro Mise ◽  
...  

Tomography ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 268-277
Author(s):  
Andrea Contegiacomo ◽  
Marco Conti ◽  
Massimo Muciaccia ◽  
Pietro Trombatore ◽  
Michele Dezio ◽  
...  

Most medical devices are routinely recognized on radiological images and described as normal findings in the radiological report, but sometimes they can cause patient access to the emergency department. Multiple possible complications have been described and most of them require prompt recognition by radiologists for proper clinical management. This commentary proposes a systematic approach to radiological reporting of the most common emergent complications related to medical devices with the intent to avoid the omission of important findings in the final radiological report.


Author(s):  
Weiping Ding ◽  
Shouvik Chakraborty ◽  
Kalyani Mali ◽  
Sankhadeep Chatterjee ◽  
Janmenjoy Nayak ◽  
...  

Surgery Today ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 496-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen-Guo Ker ◽  
Pai-Ching Sheen ◽  
Chung-Ho Chien ◽  
Chung Chieng Wu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document