Parallel electron temperature and density gradients measured in the JET MkI divertor using thermal helium beams

1997 ◽  
Vol 241-243 (1) ◽  
pp. 426-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Davies
1997 ◽  
Vol 241-243 ◽  
pp. 426-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.J. Davies ◽  
P.D. Morgan ◽  
Y. Ul'Haq ◽  
C.F. Maggi ◽  
S.K. Erents ◽  
...  

1969 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 299-310
Author(s):  
K. Bergstedt

AbstractA stationary, magnetically stabilized helium arc plasma is taken as an example to show that ionization degrees in such plasmas with large electron temperature and electron density gradients may not be calculated from static ionization relations valid for homogeneous plasmas (e. g. the Saha equation). Instead, ionization degrees in inhomogeneous plasmas must be determined from continuity equations of the form div (nΖυΖ)nΖ = JΖ-1 nΖ-1 -RΖnΖ nz where JΖ-1 and nΖ-1 are the ionization rate and the density of the Z -1 times charged ions, and RΖ , nΖ and υΖ are the recombination rate, the density and the centre-of-mass velocity of the Z times charged ions. Static ionization formulae may not be applied to inhomogeneous plasmas because the finite relaxation times for the attainment of static ionization equilibria result in these ionization equilibria being displaced by the motion of the ions parallel to the direction of electron temperature and density gradients. This is proved by means of two independent operations: firstly, the velocities of the helium ions, these being governed primarily by ambipolar diffusion, are calculated with the spectroscopically measured state variables from the momentum equations of the plasma; secondly, the velocities of the doubly charged ions are determined by integrating the continuity equation for these ions, use again being made of the measured state variables and of the ionization and recombination rates J1 and R2 of the helium ions that were calculated for this special plasma. The agreement between the independently obtained velocity values proves that the degree of ionization of the helium ions in this inhomogeneous plasma is described not by a static ionization formula, but by the continuity equations for these ions. Furthermore, it is shown that the ionization "equilibria" between singly charged and neutral helium particles and between three times (CIV) and four times (CY) charged carbon particles are not determined by means of static ionization formulae either. The influence of this hitherto disregarded effect on the spectroscopic determination of the electron temperature in the plasma discussed is illustrated in a diagram.


1984 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
SATORU KANEKO ◽  
SHIGERU OSHIO ◽  
TOSHIFUMI KOBAYASHI ◽  
HIDEO MOHRI ◽  
RIHACHI IIZUKA

2021 ◽  
Vol 502 (3) ◽  
pp. 3357-3373
Author(s):  
Henry Poetrodjojo ◽  
Brent Groves ◽  
Lisa J Kewley ◽  
Sarah M Sweet ◽  
Sebastian F Sanchez ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT We measure the gas-phase metallicity gradients of 248 galaxies selected from Data Release 2 of the SAMI Galaxy Survey. We demonstrate that there are large systematic discrepancies between the metallicity gradients derived using common strong emission line metallicity diagnostics. We determine which pairs of diagnostics have Spearman’s rank coefficients greater than 0.6 and provide linear conversions to allow the accurate comparison of metallicity gradients derived using different strong emission line diagnostics. For galaxies within the mass range 8.5 < log (M/M⊙) < 11.0, we find discrepancies of up to 0.11 dex/Re between seven popular diagnostics in the metallicity gradient–mass relation. We find a suggestion of a break in the metallicity gradient–mass relation, where the slope shifts from negative to positive, occurs between 9.5 < log (M/M⊙) < 10.5 for the seven chosen diagnostics. Applying our conversions to the metallicity gradient–mass relation, we reduce the maximum dispersion from 0.11 dex/Re to 0.02 dex/Re. These conversions provide the most accurate method of converting metallicity gradients when key emission lines are unavailable. We find that diagnostics that share common sets of emission line ratios agree best, and that diagnostics calibrated through the electron temperature provide more consistent results compared to those calibrated through photoionization models.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document