scholarly journals Experience with profound hypothermia and circulatory arrest in the treatment of aneurysms of the aortic arch

1982 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. 649-655 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Arisan Ergin ◽  
James O’Connor ◽  
Roy Guinto ◽  
Randall B. Griepp
1997 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 1067-1071 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Grabenwöger ◽  
Marek Ehrlich ◽  
Fabiola Cartes-Zumelzu ◽  
Martina Mittlböck ◽  
Günther Weigel ◽  
...  

Perfusion ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven A Raskin ◽  
Joseph S Coselli

Cardiovascular surgical repair of arch aneurysms is taking a step forward by going backwards by utilizing retrograde cerebral perfusion. Drs ME DeBakey, ES Crawford, DA Cooley and GC Morris first reported successful resection and repair of a fusiform aneurysm of the aortic arch with replacement graft in 1957.1 Since then, Crawford and Coselli have pursued materials and techniques which have made this procedure, one which generally resulted in high morbidity and mortality, more viable with decreased morbidity and mortality. Increased numbers of patients are now having this repair and are resuming normal healthy lives after the operation. From February 1992 to October 1993, 88 patients were surgically treated by Coselli who utilized retrograde cerebral perfusion with profound hypothermia and circulatory arrest, thus allowing for repairs that under any other conditions probably could not have been achieved successfully. It is evident that a major determinant for the successful clinical results, in addition to surgical technique and skill, was the employment of profound hypothermia and circulatory arrest. This article will review the techniques and results of aortic arch repair utilizing retrograde cerebral perfusion during circulatory arrest with profound hypothermia to lessen the chance of neurological morbidity following surgical replacement of the transverse aortic arch.


1985 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 412-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saade Mahfood ◽  
Anjum Qazi ◽  
Jorge Garcia ◽  
Luis Mispireta ◽  
Paul Corso ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 129-130
Author(s):  
M EHRLICH ◽  
M GRABENWOGER ◽  
P SIMON ◽  
G LAUFER ◽  
E WOLNER ◽  
...  

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Michele Murzi ◽  
Pier Andrea Farneti ◽  
Antonio Rizza ◽  
Silvia Di Sibio ◽  
Cataldo Palmieri ◽  
...  

The management of patients with aortic disease that involves the ascending aorta, the aortic arch, and the descending aorta represent a surgical challenge. Open surgical repair remains the gold standard for aortic arch pathologies. However, this operation requires a cardiopulmonary bypass and a period of profound hypothermia and circulatory arrest, which carries a substantial rate of mortality and morbidity. For these reasons, hybrid arch repair that involves a combination of open surgery with endovascular aortic stent graft placement has been introduced as a therapeutic alternative for those patients deemed unfit for open surgical procedures. Hybrid repair requires varying degrees of invasiveness and can be performed as a single-stage procedure or as a two-stage procedure. The choice of the technique is multifactorial, depending on the characteristics of the diseased arch with regard to position of the stent graft proximal landing zone, patient fitness and comorbid status, as well as surgical expertise and hospital facilities. Among the evolving hybrid procedures is the so-called “frozen” or stented elephant trunk technique. Adapted from the classical elephant trunk technique, this approach facilitates the repair of a concomitant aortic arch and proximal descending aortic aneurysms in a single stage under circulatory arrest. This technique is increasingly being used to treat extensive thoracic aortic disease and has shown promising results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document