Presentation rate and the serial-position effect of immediate serial recall

1968 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 608-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. Jahnke
1975 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 779-786
Author(s):  
Ira T. Kaplan

Lists of 5 to 10 digits, spoken at the rate of 2 digits per second, were presented to 10 Ss. The last digit in each list also occurred earlier in the list, and S's task was to write down the digit that followed the last one on its prior occurrence. The data were analyzed as measures of memory span, forgetting, and the serial position effect. These three phenomena were then related to one another by means of a principle that described how the probability of recall of each item in a list varied as a function of the numbers of preceding and following items. The effects of presentation rate and delayed recall were also discussed.


1962 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
EDWARD A. FEIGENBAUM ◽  
HERBERT A. SIMON

2004 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 465-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Powell ◽  
Jeffrey D. Gfeller ◽  
Michael V. Oliveri ◽  
Shannon Stanton ◽  
Bryan Hendricks

2019 ◽  
Vol 120 ◽  
pp. 01002
Author(s):  
Chung Won Lee ◽  
Jin Ho Kim ◽  
In Keuk Hwang

The purpose of this study was to verify the forms of the effect of serial position effects of memory according to the illuminance of light. This study was conducted as an experimental method, and 21 adults without cognitive impairment participated in the study. The illuminance condition was designed with high illuminance condition of 1,000 lx and low illuminance condition of 300 lx. The memory task used word list of 20 items consisting of a series of pointless spellings. After memorizing the word list for 10 minutes, the participant performed a retention task 24 hours later. The memory retention task consisted of filling the empty part of the learned word and completing the word. The analysis was performed by dividing the word items into three conditions: primacy, middle, and recency. Primacy used the first item in the word list, Middle used the 10th item in the middle of the word list, and finally Recency used the last item in the word list for analysis. The result was F = 4.16 (p = .02), and showed that there was a statistically significant difference in memory retention of primacy, middle, and recency at 95% confidence level in dim condition.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document