Anatomic Considerations of the Peripheral Nerve in Compressive Neuropathies of the Upper Extremity

1996 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-218
Author(s):  
Verghese George ◽  
Aloysius G. Smith
1998 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Richard T. Katz ◽  
Sankar Perraraju

Abstract The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Fourth Edition, offers several categories to describe impairment in the shoulder, including shoulder amputation, abnormal shoulder motion, peripheral nerve disorders, subluxation/dislocation, and joint arthroplasty. This article clarifies appropriate methods for rating shoulder impairment in a specific patient, particularly with reference to the AMA Guides, Section 3.1j, Shoulder, Section 3.1k, Impairment of the Upper Extremity Due to Peripheral Nerve Disorders, and Section 3.1m, Impairment Due to Other Disorders of the Upper Extremity. A table shows shoulder motions and associated degrees of motion and can be used in assessing abnormal range of motion. Assessments of shoulder impairment due to peripheral nerve lesion also requires assessment of sensory loss (or presence of nerve pain) or motor deficits, and these may be categorized to the level of the spinal nerves (C5 to T1). Table 23 is useful regarding impairment from persistent joint subluxation or dislocation, and Table 27 can be helpful in assessing impairment of the upper extremity after arthroplasty of specific bones of joints. Although inter-rater reliability has been reasonably good, the validity of the upper extremity impairment rating has been questioned, and further research in industrial medicine and physical disability is required.


Hand ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 327-334
Author(s):  
Benjamin A. Philip ◽  
Vicki Kaskutas ◽  
Susan E. Mackinnon

Background: Impairment of the dominant hand should lead to greater disability than impairment of the nondominant hand, but few studies have tested this directly, especially in the domain of upper-extremity peripheral nerve disorder. The aim of this study was to identify the association between hand dominance and standardized measures of disability and health status after upper-extremity peripheral nerve disorder. Methods: An existing database was reanalyzed to identify the relationship between affected-side (dominant vs nondominant) on individuals with unilateral upper-extremity peripheral nerve disorder (N = 400). Primary measure of disability was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Results: We found no differences in standardized measures of disability or health status between patients with affected dominant hand and patients with an affected nondominant hand. However, a post hoc exploratory analysis revealed that patients with an affected dominant hand reported substantially reduced ability to perform 2 activities in the DASH questionnaire: “write” and “turn a key.” Conclusions: Following unilateral upper-extremity peripheral nerve disorder, impairment of the dominant hand (compared with impairment of the nondominant hand) is associated with reduced ability to perform specific activities, but this reduced ability is not reflected in standardized measures of disability and health status. To adequately identify disability following unilateral impairment of the dominant hand with the DASH, individual items must be used instead of the total score. New or alternative measures are also recommended.


2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-82
Author(s):  
Young-Jun Kim ◽  
Tae-Ryeong Kim ◽  
Chang-Hoon Woo ◽  
Byung-Cheul Shin

Hand Clinics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 425-433
Author(s):  
Nishant Ganesh Kumar ◽  
Theodore A. Kung ◽  
Paul S. Cederna

This chapter describes individual nerve blocks of the radial, median, and ulnar nerves of the upper extremity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document