A Massive Transfusion Protocol to Decrease Blood Component Use and Costs

2009 ◽  
Vol 2009 ◽  
pp. 22-23
Author(s):  
D.W. Mozingo
Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4142-4142
Author(s):  
Majed A. Refaai ◽  
Kathryn Tchorz ◽  
John Forestner ◽  
Raymond Morris ◽  
Marty Koch ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Trauma has become the second leading cause of death worldwide, despite advances in modern trauma resuscitation practices. Appropriate and timely blood component therapy in the severely injured trauma patient could prevent adverse outcome due to coagulopathy. Recombinant FVIIa has been used to achieve adequate hemostasis in trauma patients in the field. Materials and Methods: In June 2004, a massive transfusion protocol (MTP) was established in Parkland Memorial Hospital in Dallas, TX for patients presenting with trauma. Major goals of the MTP were 1) to achieve faster turn around times for these products, 2) to provide an appropriate ratio of blood components in order to prevent coagulopathy of massive transfusion and use of rFVIIa to achieve better hemostasis, and 3) to reduce wastage of blood products. At all times, the Blood Bank keeps ready for emergency release 4 units each of type A and O thawed plasma (TP) and 2 units of AB TP (5 days expiration). The MTP consists of three shipments that may be repeated, if necessary. Each shipment consists of 5 packed red blood cells (PRBCs) and 2 TP. One dose of platelets is added to the second shipment, and one dose of cryoprecipitate (10 units) and rFVIIa (4.8 mg) is added to the third shipment. If the MTP goes to the 6th shipment, 2.4 mg rFVIIa is given. Once initiated, the first MTP shipment is ready for pick up in 15 minutes. If blood type can not be determined, type O RBCs with type AB TP are sent in the first shipment (Rh matching depends upon inventory and the patient’s gender). We compared MTP blood component usage in 173 trauma patients during a 24-months period with pre-MTP historical data in 67 trauma patients from the previous 12 months. Results: The average TAT of the first shipment in MTP was 9 ± 0.4 minutes. No TAT assessments of the first shipment were possible in the pre-MTP cases because there was no initiation time available. When comparing the average TATs of second and third shipments of MTP versus pre-MTP cases, however, significant reductions were achieved (18 ± 1.8 vs. 42 ± 30 and 30 ± 2.5 vs. 44 ± 31 minutes, respectively). There was a significant reduction in blood component usage with MTP as compared to pre-MTP (Table) though the mortality had not changed. The blood component wastage (especially cryoprecipitate) had decreased significantly. Conclusions: There was a significant reduction in TAT and blood products used in following establishment of MTP; this was most likely due to prevention and/or early treatment of dilutional coagulopathy and achievement of adequate hemostasis with use of rFVIIa. Table Group PRBCs Thawed Plasma Platelets CRYO rFVIIa TAT (2nd Shipment) TAT (3rd Shipment) *Pre-MTP (n = 20), CRYO = cryoprecipitate, TAT = turn-around time, N/P = not performed Pre-MTP (n = 67) 24.2 ± 16.3 11.2 ± 8.3 3.1 ± 3.5 1.6 ± 1.7 0.2 ± 0.4 42 ± 30* 44 ± 31* MTP (n = 173) 17.5 ± 12.4 6.7 ± 5.6 1.2 ± 1.4 0.7 ± 0.8 0.4 ± 0.6 18 ± 1.8 33 ± 2.5 P value 0.0055 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 00.0032 N/P N/P


2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110497
Author(s):  
Janet S. Lee ◽  
Abid D. Khan ◽  
Franklin L. Wright ◽  
Robert C. McIntyre ◽  
Warren C. Dorlac ◽  
...  

Background Military data demonstrating an improved survival rate with whole blood (WB) have led to a shift toward the use of WB in civilian trauma. The purpose of this study is to compare a low-titer group O WB (LTOWB) massive transfusion protocol (MTP) to conventional blood component therapy (BCT) MTP in civilian trauma patients. Methods Trauma patients 15 years or older who had MTP activations from February 2019 to December 2020 were included. Patients with a LTOWB MTP activation were compared to BCT MTP patients from a historic cohort. Results 299 patients were identified, 169 received LTOWB and 130 received BCT. There were no differences in age, gender, or injury type. The Injury Severity Score was higher in the BCT group (27 vs 25, P = .006). The LTOWB group had a longer transport time (33 min vs 26 min, P < .001) and a lower arrival temperature (35.8 vs 36.1, P < .001). Other hemodynamic parameters were similar between the groups. The LTOWB group had a lower in-hospital mortality rate compared to the BCT group (19.5% vs 30.0%, P = .035). There were no differences in total transfusion volumes at 4 hours and 24 hours. No differences were seen in transfusion reactions or hospital complications. Multivariable logistic regression identified ISS, age, and 24-hour transfusion volume as predictors of mortality. Discussion Resuscitating severely injured trauma patient with LTOWB is safe and may be associated with an improved survival.


CJEM ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (S1) ◽  
pp. S58-S58
Author(s):  
C. Bell ◽  
P. Davis ◽  
O. Prokopchuk-Gauk ◽  
B. Cload ◽  
A. Stirling

Introduction: Massive Transfusion Protocol (MTP) activation allows for efficient delivery of a balanced transfusion strategy to exsanguinating patients, and should deliver a reasonable ratio of plasma and platelets to red blood cells. MTP activation should facilitate communication between care providers and laboratory services in order to minimize blood product wastage. Unfortunately, it is unclear which activation criteria are best to achieve this. Understanding of acceptable sensitivity and specificity, as well as reasons for blood component wastage, may provide refinement to MTP design. Methods: We surveyed clinicians, who were identified as content experts in their fields, using a snowball survey technique. Respondents were categorized into two groups: Group 1 included Emergency Medicine, Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Surgery; Group 2 included Hematology, Hematopathology and Transfusion Medicine. Between-group differences were examined using the Pearsons Chi-Square Test. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results: 50% of physicians in Group 1 considered an MTP under-call rate of 5-10% to be acceptable, whereas the majority (57.1%) of physicians in Group 2 considered an under-call rate of <5% to be acceptable. Both groups agreed on an acceptable over-call rate of 5-10%. A significantly greater proportion of physicians in Group 1 felt that MTP activation criteria including transfusion of an entire blood volume within 24 hours, loss of >50% blood volume within 3 hours and anticipated transfusion of >10U of PRBC in 24 hours were appropriate for MTP activation. Physicians in Group 2 were more likely to consider poor communication a reason for blood component wastage. Conclusion: Similarities in acceptable over- and under-call rates of MTP highlight the similar values in MTP activation between different medical specialties. Collaboration between the resuscitation team and consultants in transfusion medicine is necessary for MTP protocol development to improve patient outcomes and reduce blood wastage.


2020 ◽  
Vol 154 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S167-S168
Author(s):  
J M Petersen ◽  
V Patel ◽  
D Jhala

Abstract Introduction/Objective Cardiac perforation is a life-threatening complication (~1% risk, with reported rates between 0.2% to 5%) of CA procedures. As cardiac perforation may lead to extensive bleeding, it would be reasonable for a medical center carrying out CA to be capable of arranging for a massive transfusion protocol and for surgical repair as required. However, there is sparse literature to guide a non-trauma medical center implementing a CA program on what the number of red blood cell (RBC) units for crossmatch should be for each case. Methods In interdisciplinary collaborative meetings, the CA program logistics were agreed to between the multiple clinical services. Given the case series on the amount of drained blood in complicated cases, there was agreement that three units of RBCs would be crossmatched for each case. Education was provided on the massive transfusion protocol and on blood bank procedures. As part of quality assurance/quality improvement, records were reviewed from the beginning of the CA program (10/1/2019) to 1/31/2019 to determine number of patient cases, crossmatched units, and transfused units for quality assurance purposes. Results A total of fifteen patients underwent CA procedures, for which three units were crossmatched for each patient. As there were no cardiac perforations with the cardiac ablation procedures so far, no units were transfused. The organized approach for ensuring adequate blood bank support and education led to the reassurance, alleviation of clinical anxiety, and building of a successful CA program. Education sessions completed with thorough understanding of blood bank procedures including the massive transfusion protocol, labeling of blood bank specimens, and on ordering of blood for crossmatch. Conclusion This study provides a reference that may provide helpful guidance to other blood banks on what the number of RBCs to be crossmatched prior to each CA procedure. Multidisciplinary collaborative meetings in advance are an essential component for ensuring adequate support for CA procedures or any new service that requires blood product support. Thorough education of clinical staff on blood bank procedures particularly the massive transfusion protocol is also recommended. This procedure for massive transfusion should be available to be referred to in real time.


2020 ◽  
pp. 000313482097977
Author(s):  
Dov Levine ◽  
Sivaveera Kandasamy ◽  
James Alford Flippin ◽  
Hirohisa Ikegami ◽  
Rachel L. Choron

Injury ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Botteri ◽  
Simone Celi ◽  
Giovanna Perone ◽  
Enrica Prati ◽  
Paola Bera ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Reza Widianto Sudjud ◽  
Djoni Kusumah Pohan ◽  
Muhammad Budi Kurniawan ◽  
Hana Nur Ramila

Hemorrhagic shock is a form of hypovolemic shock in which severe blood loss leads to inadequate oxygen delivery at the cellular level. Death from hemorrhage represents a substantial global problem, with more than 60,000 deaths per year in the United States and an estimated 1.9 million deaths per year worldwide, 1.5 million of which result from physical trauma. This case report aims to stress the need of handling cases of hemorrhagic shock in accordance with damage control protocol. Hemorrhagic shock management using permissive hypotension management, bleeding control, massive transfusion protocol (MTP), minimal crystalloid therapy, and adjuvant therapy is the best approach to get optimal outcome to prevent triad of death. In this case, the application of damage control resuscitation has not been fully implemented because of several constraints. Key words: Hemorrhage; Hemorrhagic shock; Permissive hypotension; Massive Transfusion Protocol; MTP; Resuscitation; Damage control Citation: Pohan DK, Sudjud RW, Kurniawan MB, Ramila HN. Anesthetic management on patient with hollow viscus perforation due to blunt abdominal trauma with grade IV hemorrhagic shock. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;25(2):217-221. DOI: 10.35975/apic.v25i2.1474 Received: 11 January 2021, Reviewed: 15 January 2021, Accepted: 16 February 2021


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document