Efficacy and safety of ketotifen fumarate eye drops as adjunctive therapy to mometasone furoate nasal spray in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis

2003 ◽  
Vol 111 (2) ◽  
pp. S262 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Horak ◽  
P. Stuebner ◽  
R. Zieglmayer ◽  
C.L. McWhirter ◽  
M. Gekkieva
2005 ◽  
Vol 116 (6) ◽  
pp. 1275-1281 ◽  
Author(s):  
C SMALL ◽  
J HERNANDEZ ◽  
A REYES ◽  
E SCHENKEL ◽  
A DAMIANO ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. S5-S10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel A. Drouin ◽  
William H. Yang ◽  
Frederick Horak

This international multicentre, open-label, parallel-group trial was undertaken to compare the therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of topical levocabastine and oral cetirizine in patients with perennial allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, with particular reference to the comparative onset of action of the two drugs. A total of 207 patients were randomized to receive either levocabastine nasal spray (0.5 mg/ml, two sprays in each nostril twice daily) plus levocabastine eye drops as required (0.5 mg/ml, one drop in each eye twice daily p.r.n.) or cetirizine orally (10 mg once daily) with a treatment duration of 2 weeks. Onset of action was found to be significantly more rapid with levocabastine than with cetirizine for both nasal and ocular symptoms (p < 0.001). Within 15 min of study drug administration, 36% of levocabastine-treated patients reported relief from nasal symptoms and 32% relief from ocular symptoms compared with 10% and 17% of patients on cetirizine, respectively. At 1 h, the percentages of patients reporting relief were 76% and 38% for nasal symptoms, and 81% and 48% for ocular symptoms in the levocabastine and cetirizine treatment groups, respectively. At 8 h there were no differences between the two treatments. Overall therapeutic efficacy was found to be comparable in the two treatment groups over the 2-week study period with no significant intergroup differences in symptom severity or global therapeutic efficacy. Both drugs were well tolerated with no significant differences in the incidence or type of adverse reactions between the two groups. In conclusion, levocabastine eye drops and nasal spray are as effective and well tolerated as oral cetirizine for the treatment of perennial allergic rhinoconjunctivitis with the advantage of a significantly faster onset of action for both nasal and ocular symptoms.


1995 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. S31-S38 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Gerth van Wijk

Lcocabastine is an extremely potent and highly selective H1-receptor antagonist which has been specifically developed as eye drops and nasal spray for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Clinical experience to date suggests that this topical antihistamine is at least as effective as other current first-line therapeutic approaches for the treatment of this condition, including oral H1-receptor antagonists and sodium cromoglycate. Onset of action is rapid, with clinical effects apparent within minutes of instillation. Moreover, duration of action is sufficiently long to permit a convenient twice-daily dosing regimen. Topical levocabastine is well tolerated with an adverse-effect profile comparable with that of placebo and sodium cromoglycate. As might be expected from the route of drug administration, application site reactions are the most frequent adverse effect associated with levocabastine eye drops and nasal spray with an incidence comparable with that seen in placebotreated controls. The availability of effective and well-tolerated topical antihistamines, such as levocabastine, is an important advance which broadens the range of therapeutic approaches available for the clinical management of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Levocabastine appears to be an attractive alternative to oral antihistamines as a first-line therapeutic option for the treatment of this atopic condition.


2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eli O. Meltzer ◽  
David I. Bernstein ◽  
Bruce M. Prenner ◽  
William E. Berger ◽  
Tulin Shekar ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document