A critical test of infant pattern preference models

1986 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 95
Author(s):  
James L. Dannemiller ◽  
Benjamin R. Stephens
1988 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 210 ◽  
Author(s):  
James L. Dannemiller ◽  
Benjamin R. Stephens

2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 371-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong-Lei Wang ◽  
Rochelle S. Lawrence ◽  
Zhong-Yuan Lu ◽  
Aatto Laaksonen

2014 ◽  
Vol 203 (5) ◽  
pp. 933-938 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronilda Lacson ◽  
Luciano M. Prevedello ◽  
Katherine P. Andriole ◽  
Stacy D. O'Connor ◽  
Christopher Roy ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 755-768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Hornsey ◽  
Richard Wellauer ◽  
Jason C. McIntyre ◽  
Fiona Kate Barlow
Keyword(s):  

1993 ◽  
Vol 47 (15) ◽  
pp. 10012-10015 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. K. LeGoues ◽  
R. M. Tromp ◽  
V. P. Kesan ◽  
J. Tsang
Keyword(s):  

1973 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 919-925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry Warnberg ◽  
John W. Somervill

19 crawling infants were presented on the visual cliff. Subsequently, a preference for a smaller checked pattern was successfully established for 10 infants in a non-depth situation where both patterns were placed directly beneath the glass. Although no infants descended to the deep side when patterned surfaces were displayed in the pretest, 5 of 10 infants who reached criterion for the shaping procedure descended to the deep side and 5 to the shallow in a posttest. Under nonpatterned conditions, a consistent preference for shallow or deep sides was not evidenced in either pretest or posttest conditions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document