scholarly journals Topological dimension and sums of connectivity functions☆☆This work was partially supported by NSF Cooperative Research Grant INT-9600548 with its Polish part being financed by Polish Academy of Science PAN.

2001 ◽  
Vol 112 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krzysztof Ciesielski ◽  
Jerzy Wojciechowski
Keyword(s):  
Polish Academy ◽  
Cooperative Research ◽  
Topological Dimension ◽  
Research Grant

Verification of the Futurebus+ Cache Coherence Protocol**This research was sponsored in part by the Avionics Laboratory, Wright Research and Development Center, Aeronautical Systems Division (AFSC), U.S. Air Force, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433-6543 under Contract F33615-90-C-1465, ARPA Order No. 7597 and in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant no. CCR-9005992 and in part by the Semiconductor Research Corporation under Contract 92-DJ-294 and in part by the U.S.-Israeli Binational Science Foundation and in part by a Japan-U.S. cooperative research grant from the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Scientific Research and in part by U.S.-Japan cooperative research grant number INT-90-16694 from the National Science Foundation.The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. government.

1993 ◽  
pp. 15-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edmund M. Clarke ◽  
Orna Grumberg ◽  
Hiromi Hiraishi ◽  
Somesh Jha ◽  
David E. Long ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Air Force ◽  
Cache Coherence ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Cooperative Research ◽  
National Science ◽  
Semiconductor Research Corporation ◽  
Binational Science Foundation ◽  
Development Center ◽  
The U.S ◽  
Research Grant

Social attribution, correspondence bias, and the emergence of stereotypes *This research has been completed in partial requirement of a doctoral dissertation of the first author under the supervision of the second author. We wish to thank the members of the social psychology division at the University of Louvain at Louvain-la-Neuve, especially Steve Rocher and Emanuele Castano for their insightful comments on preliminary drafts. This paper has been enriched by feedbacks received from Russell Spears, Roos Vonk, Margit Oswald, and anonymous reviewers. Many thanks to Philippe Kemp and Christophe Remy for their assistance in running the study, and to the students who volunteered to appear on the video. This research has been presented at the Social Cognition workshop of the Kurt Lewin Institute, workshop held at the Free University of Amsterdam in April 1998: we want to thank participants of this workshop and especially Gün Semin for their useful feedback. Completion of this study benefited from a research grant from the Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research to the first author.

1999 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 233-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anouk Rogier ◽  
Vincent Yzerbyt
Keyword(s):  
Correspondence Bias ◽  
Social Attribution ◽  
The Social ◽  
Dispositional Attributions ◽  
Kurt Lewin ◽  
Group Members ◽  
Group Target ◽  
The University ◽  
Institute Workshop ◽  
Research Grant

Yzerbyt, Rogier and Fiske (1998) argued that perceivers confronted with a group high in entitativity (i.e., a group perceived as an entity, a tight-knit group) more readily call upon an underlying essence to explain people's behavior than perceivers confronted with an aggregate. Their study showed that group entitativity promoted dispositional attributions for the behavior of group members. Moreover, stereotypes emerged when people faced entitative groups. In this study, we replicate and extend these results by providing further evidence that the process of social attribution is responsible for the emergence of stereotypes. We use the attitude attribution paradigm ( Jones & Harris, 1967 ) and show that the correspondence bias is stronger for an entitative group target than for an aggregate. Besides, several dependent measures indicate that the target's group membership stands as a plausible causal factor to account for members' behavior, a process we call Social Attribution. Implications for current theories of stereotyping are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document