A Review of Mineralization in the Bushveld Complex and some other Layered Intrusions

Author(s):  
C.A. Lee
Author(s):  
R. Latypov ◽  
S. Chistyakova

Abstract A recent re-interpretation of the Bushveld Complex and other layered intrusions as stacks of randomly emplaced, amalgamated sills is mostly fuelled by finding of zircon ages that are not getting progressively younger from the base upwards, as expected from a classical model for the formation of layered intrusions. Rather, they display several reversals from older to younger ages and vice-versa with moving up-section through the layered intrusions. Here, we show that the reported zircon ages are at odds with the relative ages of rocks as defined by cross-cutting relations in potholes of the Bushveld Complex. This indicates that interpretation of the zircon isotopic data as the emplacement age of the studied rocks/units is incorrect, making a new emplacement model for layered intrusions baseless. This conclusion is further buttressed by the phase equilibria analysis showing that regular cumulate sequences of layered intrusions are not reconcilable with a model of randomly emplaced sills. In this model, the late sills are free to intrude at any stratigraphic position of the pre-existing rocks, producing magmatic bodies with chaotic crystallization sequences and mineral compositional trends that are never observed in layered intrusions. There are thus no valid justifications for the re-evaluation of the current petrological model of the Bushveld Complex and other layered intrusions as large, long-lived and largely molten magma chambers. A fundamental implication of this analysis is that the current high-precision U-Pb TIMS ages from layered intrusions are inherently unreliable on the scale of several million years and cannot therefore be used for rigorous estimations of the timing of crystallization, duration of magmatism, and cooling of these intrusions.


1994 ◽  
Vol 58 (391) ◽  
pp. 299-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Grant Cawthorn

AbstractApatite in most igneous intrusions has a high Cl/F ratio. However, chlor-apatite has been reported in the lower portions of the Bushveld and Stillwater Complexes. This has been used as evidence supporting the early separation of a Cl-rich discrete hydrous fluid in these intrusions. Mineralogical evidence is presented here to demonstrate that the Bushveld Complex, at least, formed from a nearly anhydrous magma, and did not release a hydrous fluid before apatite began to crystallize. It is suggested that apatite in the earliest cumulates equilibrated with trapped interstitial liquid, which converted it from the typical F-rich composition of cumulus apatite to a Cl-rich composition. This is an analogous process to that in which cumulus mafic minerals may become more Fe-rich on cooling and reaction with interstitial liquid.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.D. Maier ◽  
◽  
Qun-Ke Xia ◽  

Layered intrusions host some of the world’s most important ore deposits, yet their global distribution, age, and petrogenesis remain poorly known. Here we provide an update on our current understanding and highlight some key outstanding research questions, notably on the potential importance of reactive flow. We present some preliminary data on water contents of Bushveld orthopyroxenes from which we calculated the water contents of the magma. The analysed Bushveld rocks, including the Merensky Reef, crystallised from relatively water-poor magma, similar to many other continental basalts.


2003 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 356-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonja L. Boorman ◽  
James B. McGuire ◽  
Alan E. Boudreau ◽  
Johann F. Kruger

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhuo-Sen Yao ◽  
James Mungall

Abstract The great economic significance of layered mafic-ultramafic intrusions like the Bushveld Complex of South Africa results from the existence within them of some layers highly concentrated in valuable elements. Here we address the origins of the Main Magnetite Layer, a globally important resource of Fe-Ti-V-rich magnetite. Previous models of in situ fractional magnetite crystallization require frequent ad hoc adjustments to the boundary conditions. An alternative model of rapid deposition of loose piles of magnetite crystals followed by compositional convection near the top of the pile and infiltration of the pile from beneath by migrating intercumulus melt fits observations without any adjustments. The data admit both explanations, but the latter model, with the fewest unconstrained interventions, is preferable. The choice of models has pivotal ramifications for understanding of the fundamental processes by which crystals accumulate and layers form in layered intrusions.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rais Latypov ◽  
Sofya Chistyakova ◽  
Stephen Barnes ◽  
Belinda Godel ◽  
Gary Delaney ◽  
...  

Abstract An emerging and increasingly pervasive school of thought is that large, long-lived and largely molten magma chambers are transient to non-existent in Earth’s history1–13. These ideas attempt to supplant the classical paradigm of the ‘big magma tank’ chambers in which the melt differentiates, is replenished, and occasionally feeds the overlying volcanoes14–23. The stratiform chromitites in the Bushveld Complex – the largest magmatic body in the Earth’s crust24 – however, offers strong contest to this shifting concept. Several chromitites in this complex occur as layers up to 2 metres in thickness and more than 400 kilometres in lateral extent, implying that chromitite-forming events were chamber-wide phenomena24–27. Field relations and microtextural data, specifically the relationship of 3D coordination number and grain size, indicate that the chromitites grew as a 3D framework of touching chromite grains directly at the chamber floor from a melt saturated in chromite only28–30. Mass-balance estimates dictate that a 1 to 4 km thick column of this melt26,31,32 is required to form each of these chromitite layers. Therefore, an enormous volume of melt (>1,00,000 km3)24,25 must have been involved in the generation of all the Bushveld chromitite layers, with half of this melt being expelled from the magma chamber24,26. We therefore argue that the very existence of thick and laterally extensive chromitite layers in the Bushveld and other layered intrusions strongly buttress the classical paradigm of ‘big magma tank’ chambers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document