scholarly journals EP-1146: Initial experience with portal dosimetry patient-specific pretreatment verifications of IMRT plans

2013 ◽  
Vol 106 ◽  
pp. S432-S433
Author(s):  
F. Lliso ◽  
M.C. Pujades ◽  
T. Garcia ◽  
J. Gimeno ◽  
V. Carmona ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Joshua Bodie

This chapter summarizes the results of an important trial comparing transurethral alprostadil to placebo in men with erectile dysfunction. Sexual intercourse was reported as having occurred more often in the alprostadil group, and more men in the group experienced orgasm. Penile pain was reported by approximately one-third of men during clinic testing. This study described the initial experience with transurethral alprostadil and identified the effectiveness of patient-specific doses.


2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (6Part19) ◽  
pp. 3240-3240
Author(s):  
S Qi ◽  
A Hu ◽  
D Westerly ◽  
H Rice ◽  
F Newman ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (6Part17) ◽  
pp. 297-297
Author(s):  
H Abbas ◽  
D Carlson ◽  
J Deng ◽  
R Nath ◽  
Z Chen

2017 ◽  
Vol 104 (1) ◽  
pp. 336-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liesbeth M. Desender ◽  
Isabelle Van Herzeele ◽  
Zoran Rancic ◽  
Colin Bicknell ◽  
Ignatios Zairis ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ernest Osei ◽  
Sarah Graves ◽  
Johnson Darko

Abstract Background: The complexity associated with the treatment planning and delivery of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans which employs continuous dynamic modulation of dose rate, field aperture and gantry speed necessitates diligent pre-treatment patient-specific quality assurance (QA). Numerous techniques for pre-treatment VMAT treatment plans QA are currently available with the aid of several different devices including the electronic portal imager (EPID). Although several studies have provided recommendations for gamma criteria for VMAT pre-treatment QA, there are no specifics for SRS/SRT VMAT QA. Thus, we conducted a study to evaluate intracranial SRS/SRT VMAT QA to determine clinical action levels for gamma criteria based on the institutional estimated means and standard deviations. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 118 EPID patient-specific pre-treatment QA dosimetric measurements of 47 brain SRS/SRT VMAT treatment plans using the integrated Varian solution (RapidArcTM planning, EPID and Portal dosimetry system) for planning, delivery and EPID QA analysis. We evaluated the maximum gamma (γmax), average gamma (γave) and percentage gamma passing rate (%GP) for different distance-to-agreement/dose difference (DTA/DD) criteria and low-dose thresholds. Results: The gamma index analysis shows that for patient-specific SRS/SRT VMAT QA with the portal dosimetry, the mean %GP is ≥98% for 2–3 mm/1–3% and Field+0%, +5% and +10% low-dose thresholds. When applying stricter spatial criteria of 1 mm, the mean %GP is >90% for DD of 2–3% and ≥88% for DD of 1%. The mean γmax ranges: 1·32 ± 1·33–2·63 ± 2·35 for 3 mm/1–3%, 1·57 ± 1·36–2·87 ± 2·29 for 2 mm/1–3% and 2·36 ± 1·83–3·58 ± 2·23 for 1 mm/1–3%. Similarly the mean γave ranges: 0·16 ± 0·06–0·19 ± 0·07 for 3 mm/1–3%, 0·21 ± 0·08–0·27 ± 0·10 for 2 mm/1–3% and 0·34 ± 0·14–0·49 ± 0·17 for 1 mm/1–3%. The mean γmax and mean γave increase with increased DTA and increased DD for all low-dose thresholds. Conclusions: The establishment of gamma criteria local action levels for SRS/SRT VMAT pre-treatment QA based on institutional resources is imperative as a useful tool for standardising the evaluation of EPID-based patient-specific SRS/SRT VMAT QA. Our data suggest that for intracranial SRS/SRT VMAT QA measured with the EPID, a stricter gamma criterion of 1 mm/2% or 1 mm/3% with ≥90% %GP could be used while still maintaining an in-control QA process with no extra burden on resources and time constraints.


2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 107-115
Author(s):  
Sung Yeop Kim ◽  
Jaehyeon Park ◽  
Jae Won Park ◽  
Ji Woon Yea ◽  
Se An Oh

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document