Quality assurance in radiotherapy: the importance of medical physics staffing levels. Recommendations from an ESTRO/EFOMP joint task group

1996 ◽  
Vol 41 (9) ◽  
pp. 89-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Belletti
1996 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Belletti ◽  
A. Dutreix ◽  
G. Garavaglia ◽  
H. Gfirtner ◽  
J. Haywood ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 3212-3213
Author(s):  
Anurag A. Luharia

Ionizing radiation has validated its existence and effectiveness in modern medicine for both diagnostic and therapeutic use. For the last decade rapid growth in medical radiation application has witnessed in India towards the betterment of mankind, for safe and quality clinical practice, radiation protection and quality assurance. At the end of the 19th century Physics brought paradigm shift in the field of radiation-based medical diagnosis and treatment and giving rise to the modern medical physicist profession and revolutionized the practice of medicine. Medical Physicists are the scientists with Post graduation / PhD degrees, and certified from A.E.R.B as Radiological Safety Officer, deals with utilization of Physics knowledge in developing not only lifesaving tools & technology but also diagnosis and treatments of various medical conditions that help humans live longer and healthier. Medical Physicists are responsible to carry out the commissioning, establishment of entire Radiation facility and get the clearance of statutory compliances form authorities in order to start the clinical practice are also responsible for research, developing and evaluating new analytical techniques, planning and ensuring safe and accurate treatment of patients also provide advice about radiation protection, training and updating healthcare, scientific and technical staff , managing radiotherapy quality assurance program, mathematical modeling ,maintaining equipment ,writing reports, teaching ,laboratory management and administration. Now it’s a time to raise the curtain from the Medical Physics profession and utilize their services up to maximum extent in the field of scientific research, academic, teaching, diagnosis, treatment and safety.


2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (12) ◽  
pp. 5471-5489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas Pfeiffer ◽  
Steven Sutlief ◽  
Wenzheng Feng ◽  
Heather M. Pierce ◽  
Jim Kofler

2003 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 2762-2792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sasa Mutic ◽  
Jatinder R. Palta ◽  
Elizabeth K. Butker ◽  
Indra J. Das ◽  
M. Saiful Huq ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Scott Crowe ◽  
Trent Aland ◽  
Lotte Fog ◽  
Lynne Greig ◽  
Lynsey Hamlett ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sadiq R Malik ◽  
Motiur Rahman ◽  
Mohsin Mia ◽  
Abdul Jobber ◽  
Ashish K Bairagi ◽  
...  

No abstract available.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjmp.v6i1.19752 Bangladesh Journal of Medical Physics Vol.6 No.1 2013 3-20 


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 375-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiqiang Liu ◽  
Jianrong Dai ◽  
Tinglin Qiu ◽  
Ye Zhang ◽  
Jufang Shi ◽  
...  

AbstractAim:To assess helical tomotherapy (TOMO) current clinical application and practice in mainland China.Materials and methods:Data were collected for all TOMO units clinically operational in mainland China by 30 April 2016, including (a) the distribution of installation and staffing levels; (b) types of cancers treated; (c) utilisation efficiency; (d) quality assurance; (e) maintenance; (f) optional features; and (g) satisfaction levels. The data were collected as a census and analysed qualitatively and quantitatively.Results:As of 30 April 2016, 23 TOMO units were used clinically by 22 hospitals in mainland China. In the same period, 22,558 cancer patients were treated. For TOMO units with more than a year of clinical utilisation, a median of 378 cases were treated annually per machine. The median daily operation was 10·5 hours, and treatment headcount was 38·3 patients. The median service outage rate was 2·6%, and the most common cause was malfunction of the multi-leaf collimator. In terms of overall satisfaction levels, 3 hospitals were very satisfied, 16 were satisfied and 3 considered their satisfaction level as average.Findings:The overall operation of TOMO is good, but there are some problems due to running at full capacity, lack of clinical efficacy research and insufficient quality assurance regulations.


1990 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 287-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald R. Price ◽  
Leon Axel ◽  
Tommie Morgan ◽  
Robert Newman ◽  
William Perman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document