Use pH Monitoring, Barium Contrast To Diagnose Acid Reflux in Children

2005 ◽  
Vol 35 (20) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
ROBERT FINN
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-soo Park ◽  
Oleksandr Khoma ◽  
Hans Van Der Wall ◽  
Gregory Falk

Abstract   No gold-standard investigation exists for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). Multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII)-pH testing has uncertain utility in LPR. Meanwhile, reflux scintigraphy allows immediate and delayed visualisation of tracer reflux in the esophagus, pharynx, and lungs. The present study aimed to correlate MII-pH and scintigraphic reflux results in patients with primary LPR. Methods Consecutive patients with LPR underwent MII-pH and scintigraphic reflux studies. Abnormal values for MII-pH results were defined from existing literature. MII-pH and scintigraphic data were correlated. Results 105 patients with LPR (31 males (29.5%), median age 60 years (range: 20–87)) were studied. Scintigraphic reflux was seen in the pharynx in 94 (90.4%), and in the proximal esophagus in 94 (90.4%). Delayed scintigraphic contamination of the pharynx was seen in 101 patients (96.2%) and in the lungs of 56 patients (53.3%). Abnormal reflux was seen in the distal esophagus in 12.4%, proximal esophagus in 25.7%, and in the pharynx in 82.9%. Patients with poor scintigraphic clearance had higher Demeester scores (p = 0.043), more proximal reflux episodes (p = 0.046), more distal acid reflux episodes (p = 0.023), and longer bolus clearance times (p = 0.002). Conclusion Reflux scintigraphy has a high yield in LPR patients. Scintigraphic time-activity curves correlated with validated MII-pH results. A high rate of pulmonary microaspiration was found in LPR patients. This study demonstrated a high level of pharyngeal contamination by scintigraphy and MII-pH, which supports the use of digital reflux scintigraphy in diagnosing LPR.


2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-36
Author(s):  
Valentina Pilotto ◽  
Gemma Maddalo ◽  
Costanza Orlando ◽  
Matteo Fassan ◽  
Massimo Rugge ◽  
...  

Background and Aims: Patients with autoimmune atrophic gastritis (AAG) often complain of acid reflux symptoms, despite the evidence of hypo-achlorhydria. Rome IV criteria are used to define functional esophageal disorders. Our aim was to characterize gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) phenotypes in patients with AAG. Methods: Between 2017-2018, 172 AAG patients were evaluated at Gastro-Oncology outpatient clinic of University of Padua. Of them, 38 patients with reflux symptoms underwent high-resolution manometry (HRM) and multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (MII-pH). Seventy-six AAG consecutive patients asymptomatic for gastroesophageal reflux were selected as age and gender matched controls. Serum biomarkers (pepsinogens, gastrin-17 and Helicobacter pylori antibodies), upper endoscopy, histology and clinical data were compared. Results: Out of 38/172 (22%) AAG patients with reflux symptoms, 2/38 had a GERD diagnosis based on abnormal esophageal acid exposure and 6/38 had a major motility disorder (i.e. outflow obstruction). Among the 30/38 patients with normal endoscopic findings, 9/30 had reflux hypersensitivity, 19 functional heartburn, 1 functional globus, 1 functional chest pain according to the Rome IV criteria. Antral atrophy, advanced corpus atrophy and OLGA stage were more frequent in controls than in reflux patients (p=0.01, p=0.031, p=0.01, respectively). No differences were found for serum biomarkers and symptom presentation. Most of the patients received proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) treatment (87%), with a minority (34%) reporting clinical benefit. Conclusions: Reflux symptoms are relatively common in AAG patients, but a firm diagnosis of GERD is rare (5%), whereas most of the patients have a functional disorder. PPI treatment is mostly clinical ineffective and should not be largely indicated.


1995 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 587-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. G. Milross ◽  
B. H. Negus ◽  
N. E. Street ◽  
K. J. Gaskin

The incidence of gastro-oesophageal reflux in children undergoing general anaesthesia has not previously been studied. One-hundred-and-twenty children (ASA Class 1–2) were studied intraoperatively using continuous oesophageal pH monitoring. The incidence of reflux was 2.5% (3 of 120). None of these three patients had an adverse respiratory event. There was no correlation between reflux and adverse respiratory events. Thirteen patients had minor respiratory events without evidence of acid reflux. Gastro-oesophageal reflux does occur in healthy paediatric patients having minor surgery, but was not a significant cause of the adverse respiratory events that occurred in our study.


2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 85-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rimon Sobhi AZZAM

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a clinical condition that develops when the reflux of stomach contents causes troublesome symptoms and/or complications. Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation is the main pathophysiological mechanism of GERD. Symptoms and complications can be related to the reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus, oral cavity, larynx and/or the lung. Symptoms and other possible manifestations of GERD are heartburn, regurgitation, dysphagia, non-cardiac chest pain, chronic cough, chronic laryngitis, asthma and dental erosions. The proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is the first-choice drug and the most commonly medication used for the treatment of GERD. The most widespread definition of Refractory GERD is the clinical condition that presents symptoms with partial or absent response to twice-daily PPI therapy. Persistence of symptoms occurs in 25% to 42% of patients who use PPI once-daily and in 10% to 20% who use PPI twice-daily. OBJECTIVE: The objective is to describe a review of the current literature, highlighting the causes, diagnostic aspects and therapeutic approach of the cases with suspected reflux symptoms and unresponsive to PPI. CONCLUSION: Initially, the management of PPI refractoriness consists in correcting low adherence to PPI therapy, adjusting the PPI dosage and emphasizing the recommendations on lifestyle modification change, avoiding food and activities that trigger symptoms. PPI decreases the number of episodes of acid reflux; however, the number of “non-acid” reflux increases and the patient continues to have reflux despite PPI. In this way, it is possible to greatly reduce greatly the occurrence of symptoms, especially those dependent on the acidity of the refluxed material. Response to PPI therapy can be evaluated through clinical, endoscopic, and reflux monitoring parameters. In the persistence of the symptoms and/or complications, other causes of Refractory GERD should be suspected. Then, diagnostic investigation must be initiated, which is supported by clinical parameters and complementary exams such as upper digestive endoscopy, esophageal manometry and ambulatory reflux monitoring (esophageal pH monitoring or esophageal impedance-pH monitoring). Causes of refractoriness to PPI therapy may be due to the true Refractory GERD, or even to other non-reflux diseases, which can generate symptoms similar to GERD. There are several causes contributing to PPI refractoriness, such as inappropriate use of the drug (lack of patient adherence to PPI therapy, inadequate dosage of PPI), residual acid reflux due to inadequate acid suppression, nocturnal acid escape, “non-acid” reflux, rapid metabolism of PPI, slow gastric emptying, and misdiagnosis of GERD. This is a common cause of failure of the clinical treatment and, in this case, the problem is not the treatment but the diagnosis. Causes of misdiagnosis of GERD are functional heartburn, achalasia, megaesophagus, eosinophilic esophagitis, other types of esophagitis, and other causes. The diagnosis and treatment are specific to each of these causes of refractoriness to clinical therapy with PPI.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 145-146
Author(s):  
J Fruitman ◽  
C H Parker ◽  
L W Liu

Abstract Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is often implicated as a potential etiology for various oropharyngeal (OP) symptoms. Although ambulatory reflux monitoring has been recommended by professional societies for the assessment of OP symptoms, it is unclear if objective measures of acid exposure in the esophagus correlate with the presence of these OP symptoms. Aims The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of abnormal 24-hour pH monitoring in patients presenting with various OP symptoms in our motility unit. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients referred for 24-hour pH monitoring for the evaluation of OP symptoms to the open-access Clinical Motility Unit at the University Health Network between January 1, 2008 and June 1, 2019. Seven symptom categories were examined including cough, globus, throat discomfort, voice change, dental erosion, altered taste, and sensation of phlegm in the throat. The results of the 24-hour pH monitoring were collected. A test was considered abnormal if while off anti-secretory therapy the overall acid exposure (pH < 4) in the distal esophagus was greater than 4.2% of the total time or if while on anti-secretory therapy the overall acid exposure in the esophagus was greater than 1.2% of the time. Descriptive statistics were performed to analyze the data. Results 384 patients were included in the final analysis. 167 patients (43.5%) presented with cough, 63 (16.4%) with globus, 86 (22.4%) with throat discomfort, 19 (5.9%) with voice changes, 13 (3.4%) with dental erosion, 17 (4.4%) with altered taste and 19 (4.9%) with sensation of phlegm in the throat. Overall, 19.5% of patients presenting with oropharyngeal symptoms had abnormal 24-hour pH monitoring. Abnormal 24-hr pH monitoring was present in 24.6% of those with cough, 15.9% of those with globus, 16.3% of those with throat discomfort, 21.1% of those with voice changes, 23.1% of those with dental erosion, 5.9% of those with altered taste and 10.5% of those with sensation of phlegm in the throat. Conclusions This study demonstrates that only a small proportion of patients with OP symptoms have abnormal gastroesophageal acid reflux based on objective 24-hour pH monitoring. Given these findings, future studies to examine the factors that predict having abnormal 24-hour pH monitoring in patients presenting with OP symptoms will help guide resource management of motility testing to determine which patients would benefit most from this type of evaluation. Funding Agencies None


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Plocek ◽  
Beata Gębora-Kowalska ◽  
Jakub Białek ◽  
Wojciech Fendler ◽  
Ewa Toporowska-Kowalska

Various clinical symptoms are attributed to extraesophageal reflux disease (EERD). Multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (MII-pH) is considered to correlate symptoms with acid and nonacid gastroesophageal reflux (GER) events. Pharyngeal pH monitoring (Dx-pH) is considered to correlate the decrease in the pH level in the oropharynx with reported symptoms and to diagnose supraesophageal reflux. We aimed to assess the correlation between acid reflux episodes recorded by Dx-pH and GER detected via MII-pH in children with suspected EERD. The study enrolled 23 consecutive children (15 boys and 8 girls; median age 8.25 [range 3-16.5] years) with suspected EERD. MII-pH and Dx-pH were conducted concurrently in all patients. A total of 1228 reflux episodes were recorded by MII-pH. With the antimonic sensor placed inside the impedance probe, 1272 pH-only reflux episodes were recorded. Of these, 977 (76.81%) were associated with a retrograde bolus transit. Regarding GER, 630 full-column episodes extended to the most proximal pair of impedance sensors; 500 (83.33%) demonstrated an acidic character. The following acid reflux numbers were determined by the Dx-pH system: forpH<4,n=126;pH<4.5,n=136;pH<5,n=167; andpH<5.5,n=304, and for a decrease inpH>10%relative to the baseline,n=324. There was no significant correlation between the number of pharyngeal reflux episodes detected by Dx-pH and that of GERs identified by MII-pH. The proportion of oropharyngeal pH events that were temporally related to a GER episode increased with the extended pH criteria. The highest proportion was observed for a pH decrease of ≥10% from the baseline and did not exceed 5.2%. The application of the extended pH criteria in the Dx-pH system resulted in an increase in the number of diagnosed laryngopharyngeal refluxes; most were not temporally associated with GER episodes confirmed by MII-pH. Thus, the efficacy of the exclusive application of Dx-pH for supraesophageal gastric reflux diagnosis is uncertain.


2018 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S216
Author(s):  
Reena V. Chokshi ◽  
Seung Chung ◽  
Harsimran Brar ◽  
Prithvi Patil ◽  
Julie Guider ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document