An infographic of data sharing in North America

This infographic shows a comparative data sharing policy recently released by the main public research funding agencies in Canada and United States.

Post-conflict development, reviewing the water sector in Somalia

Somali post-conflict development faces many challenges that affect the sustainability of the water sector. This paper reviews and analyses the post-conflict development activities in the water sector through local communications and reviewing published materials and databases from international players in Somalia, funding agencies and financial tracking service. The paper has shown that there has been great attention and support given to the country during its post-conflict development. However, most of these initiatives and projects have focused on emerging issues such as tackling food security and water, sanitation and hygiene services. The paper also shows that the continuous funding of emerging issues in Somalia has reduced its long-term sustainability of the water sector and limited its national and long-term benefits but has increased corruption due to increase the gap between actors and local people. Therefore, new transparent cooperative initiatives are needed based on transparent involvement and coordination among donors, local authorities and implementers to improve and develop the water sector and the livelihood in Somalia through a solid water governance system.

Research Output of University of Jaffna, Sri Lanka during 2000 2019

Universities play a vital role in the research and development of a country. A scientometric analysis is an essential tool used by the administrators, funding agencies, government, and researchers to know the publication trend on a topic, institution, author, journal, etc. This study analyses pattern of articles published by the University of Jaffna (UoJ) during 2000-2019; identifies publication growth rate, most prolific authors and their citation impact, communication pattern in terms of type of documents, journal publishing country and impact factor of these journals and also the international collaboration. Analysis of the data indicates, there are 293 articles were published in WOS indexed journals. The publication growth rate indicates that there is a consistent growth in the number of publications after 2014. It was found that multi-authorship dominates among UoJ researchers. A high number of publications were on Multidisciplinary Sciences. The UoJ collaborated with different countries; among them 59 articles were published with United Kingdom. Among the highly cited top 10 publications, an article authored by Ravirajan P received a high number of citations of 480. Among the funding agencies National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka funded for 24 publications, while UoJ funded for 16 and among the international funding agencies UK Research Innovation (UKRI) funded for 7 publications during the study period.

Sex, Gender, and Diversity Analysis in Research Policies of Major Public Granting Agencies: A Global Review

National research agencies are funded by taxpayer monies and, as such, are responsible for promoting excellent research that benefits all of society. Integrating sex, gender and diversity analysis (SG&DA) into the design of research, where relevant, can improve research methodology and provide new insights. To realize this potential, funding agencies have developed policies for integrating this type of analysis into the grant proposal process. This study reviews those policies for 23 agencies across six continents. Overall, one agency achieved superior performance, six agencies scored excellent performance, five showed average performance, two need some improvement and nine require improvement. Our study developed a five-part SG&DA policy roadmap for agencies and collected best practices across that guide. Standard practices, tailored as appropriate to country-specific cultures and regulatory landscapes, will enhance collaboration potential, global equity, research excellence and reproducibility.

Standard-relevant publications: evidence, processes and influencing factors

This paper introduces the concept of standard-relevant publications, complementary to standard-essential patents and framed by the concept of knowledge utilization. By analyzing the reference lists of the around 20,000 standards released by ISO, authors of scientific papers cited in standards who are working at German institutions were identified. The institutions include universities, independent research societies, ministerial research institutes and companies. Almost thirty interviews were conducted with the most-cited of these authors. The interviews addressed the processes by which scientific publications come to be referenced in standards, and the motivations, the barriers and the effects of this. The findings demonstrate opportunities for and challenges to establishing standard-relevant publications as a new performance indicator for researchers, funding agencies, standard-setting organizations and ultimately regulators.

Introduction

In 2014, the Swiss Confederation established the Swiss Competence Center for Research in Energy, Society and Transition to respond to important challenges posed by the Swiss energy transition, envisaged by the so-called “Energy Strategy 2050”. This chapter reflects on the research done by the 55 researchers within SCCER CREST that decided to conduct their work under the umbrella term “energy governance”. Given the plethora of findings and recommendations that can be derived from this research and that are compiled in this volume, the authors of this chapter have discussed extensively whether all these findings can be stitched together into an integrated narrative, thereby providing guidance on how to transform an energy industry. However, connecting the research results of this volume towards an integrated narrative would necessarily be a construct. Instead, we offer some thoughts on the urge of funding agencies to have such narratives at their disposal.

The role of bioprotectants for disease control in integrated crop protection approaches

Bioprotectants have the potential to replace chemical pesticides in agricultural cropping systems and crop protection approaches. Development of new bioprotectants in combination with more restricted use of chemical crop protection will result in their much stronger market position in the future. Bioprotectants fulfil particular roles in current and future crop protection approaches, primarily reducing pesticide residues in harvested products in conventional systems, as well as being the first and preferred control option in integrated pest management programs and organic farming, and complementing resident microbiomes in future resilient cropping systems. The process of developing bioprotectants can take ten to 15 years. This chapter aims to give a brief overview of the role of bioprotectants in current and future crop protection approaches to stimulate discussion within the biocontrol industries, and amongst scientists and funding agencies on the need for new generations of bioprotectants for an agriculture industry undergoing transition.

Key Principles in Ethical Data Analysis and Handling Conflicts of Interest

This chapter covers ethical issues in data analysis, such as p-hacking (massaging data until significant results emerge) and HARKing (hypothesizing after the results are known). The chapter also discusses conflicts of interest, including financial conflicts as well as unreasonable ambition, egotism, “publish or perish” pressures that academics face, and pressures to secure grant funding. Recommendations are provided for avoiding and managing these challenges. Having multiple people conducting analyses is suggested as one way to maximize the likelihood of ethical data analysis. The chapter also provides recommendations for journal editors, department and university administrators, and funding agencies for ensuring that they do not inadvertently incentivize unethical data analytic practices.

Kiwis Counting Kiwis: Biodiversity Monitoring on Private Land in New Zealand

<p>This thesis seeks to determine what monitoring will measure the effectiveness of public funding for the protection and enhancement of biodiversity on private land in New Zealand. To establish this, four questions have been asked: Is monitoring of biodiversity change on private land a requirement to provide information for biodiversity status reports? With biodiversity loss such a critical world issue, New Zealand has committed to its protection along with many other nations. The country's obligations and strategies for protecting, monitoring and reporting biodiversity change on private land are provided. Current reporting practices are critiqued and conclude that key data are not being collected and that private land is not well covered. As a result, biodiversity reports include very little biodiversity outcome data from private land. Are there are a core group of biodiversity monitoring methods suitable for landowners to measure the success of their conservation actions and to measure improvements to biodiversity on their land? 19 landowners and monitors who are engaged in conservation work and biodiversity outcome monitoring on private land have been interviewed in 12 case studies. These landowners and monitors are using 31 different monitoring methods. The methods have been assessed to see how landowners use the data and assessed against a set of criteria to determine their suitability. A core group of nine biodiversity monitoring methods emerge as the most useful in these cases. Do agencies which fund biodiversity protection and enhancement on private land need to measure the success of their funding initiatives? 18 agencies have given funds to these 12 case studies to support the conservation of some of the country's most threatened and endangered species, ecosystems and habitats that are found on their land. Results show that few quantitative indicators are used to measure improvements to biodiversity which may result from these grants. This research suggests ways for agencies which fund biodiversity protection on private land to measure the success of their funding initiatives so the effectiveness of these funds can be assessed. What biodiversity information do landowners need in order to make decisions about management on their land and to inform agencies which have funded biodiversity conservation on their land? The monitoring methods in use by landowners are considered in terms of their suitability to inform land management decisions and to inform funding agencies of the outcomes of the funds. This leads to a recommended core group of methods that can meet the needs of both parties. The research found that monitoring is as much a social event as a scientific exercise. Landowners found the social resources they needed to support their monitoring included having others to work with, having others to talk to like mentors, financial support, getting rewards from their monitoring results and gaining confidence to give it a go. All landowners and monitors identified barriers to monitoring they had to overcome, and these are discussed. This thesis recommends a list of core monitoring methods that are suitable for landowners to measure progress towards their biodiversity goals, improvements to biodiversity and can assist with land management decisions. They can also be used by funding agencies to judge the effectiveness of their funding towards the protection and enhancement of biodiversity on private land in New Zealand. This investigation highlights eight issues with funding goals, biodiversity monitoring and reporting on private land and provides 17 recommendations to address the issues. With 70% of New Zealand in private ownership, it is vital that landowners understand how their land contributes to the survival of native vegetation, habitats, ecosystems, species and their genes, which live on their land. The landowners in these 12 cases understand. They undertake conservation work and biodiversity monitoring, which demonstrates that landowners could provide information and evidence to measure the effectiveness of public funding for biodiversity protection on their land. These kiwi landowners are counting kiwis, and other biodiversity indicators, to measure the effect of their conservation work and its impact on restoring New Zealand's unique flora and fauna.</p>