Modulation of event-related potentials in normal human subjects by visual divided attention to spatial and color factors

2001 ◽  
Vol 311 (3) ◽  
pp. 198-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu Omoto ◽  
Yoshiyuki Kuroiwa ◽  
Mei Li ◽  
Hiroshi Doi ◽  
Megumi Shimamura ◽  
...  
1996 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brigitte Röder ◽  
Frank Rösler ◽  
Erwin Hennighausen ◽  
Fritz Näcker

2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 238-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Søren K. Andersen ◽  
Sandra Fuchs ◽  
Matthias M. Müller

We investigated mechanisms of concurrent attentional selection of location and color using electrophysiological measures in human subjects. Two completely overlapping random dot kinematograms (RDKs) of two different colors were presented on either side of a central fixation cross. On each trial, participants attended one of these four RDKs, defined by its specific combination of color and location, in order to detect coherent motion targets. Sustained attentional selection while monitoring for targets was measured by means of steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) elicited by the frequency-tagged RDKs. Attentional selection of transient targets and distractors was assessed by behavioral responses and by recording event-related potentials to these stimuli. Spatial attention and attention to color had independent and largely additive effects on the amplitudes of SSVEPs elicited in early visual areas. In contrast, behavioral false alarms and feature-selective modulation of P3 amplitudes to targets and distractors were limited to the attended location. These results suggest that feature-selective attention produces an early, global facilitation of stimuli having the attended feature throughout the visual field, whereas the discrimination of target events takes place at a later stage of processing that is only applied to stimuli at the attended position.


Author(s):  
M. F. S. Rushworth ◽  
R. E. Passingham ◽  
A. C. Nobre

Abstract. A series of distinct event-related potentials (ERPs) have been recorded from the scalp of human subjects as they switch from one task to another. It is possible that task switching may depend on different mechanisms depending on whether the switch requires a change in attentional set, in other words the redirecting of attention to different aspects of a sensory stimulus, or whether it requires a change in intentional set, in others words a change in the way that responses are selected. To address this issue, the current study recorded ERPs while subjects switched between attentional sets and the results were compared with those of a previous investigation in which subjects switched between intentional sets. Subjects selected stimuli according to two conflicting attentional sets, each emphasizing one visual stimulus dimension (colour, shape). Pairs of stimuli, only one of which was to be attended, were presented for between eight and seventeen trials then either a switch or a stay cue was shown. The switch cue instructed subjects to switch from the current attentional set to the other set, while the stay cue instructed subjects to maintain the current set. Comparing ERPs time-locked to the switch and stay cues revealed neural correlates of the initiation of a task switch. Comparing the ERPs time locked to the first stimuli after either stay or switch cues identified neural correlates of the implementation of a task switch. A similar modulation over parietal electrodes was seen when subjects were switching between either attentional or intentional sets. While an intentional set switch began with a medial frontal modulation, attentional set switching began with a lateral frontal modulation. Implementing a new attentional set was associated with modulation of relatively early visual potentials, while implementing a new intentional set was associated with modulation of later response-related potentials. The results confirm that task switching consists of a number of constituent processes which may be taxed to different degrees depending on whether a task-switch paradigm requires subjects to change the way in which they select stimuli or responses.


1995 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina T. Ciesielski ◽  
Jeanne E. Knight ◽  
Ronald J. Prince ◽  
Richard J. Harris ◽  
Stanley D. Handmaker

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document