Unstable fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the fingers: A preliminary report of a new treatment technique

1978 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 386-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Agee
Keyword(s):  
Preliminary Report ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Unstable Fracture ◽  
Treatment Technique ◽  
Fracture Dislocations ◽  
New Treatment

Internal Fixation of Unstable Fracture Dislocations of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint

2005 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 492-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. GRANT ◽  
A. C. BERGER ◽  
S. K. Y. THAM
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Early Mobilization ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Unstable Fracture ◽  
Group Operation ◽  
Chronic Group ◽  
Acute Group ◽  
Palmar Plate ◽  
Fracture Dislocations

We report a group of 14 patients with fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint with fracture fragments of adequate size to allow reduction of the proximal interphalangeal joint and internal mini screw fixation of the bone fragment attached to the palmar plate to the base of the middle phalanx. Three years after surgery, (range 25–52 months) the average total active range of motion of the proximal interphalangeal joint was 100° (range 65–115°) for the acute group (operation within 14 days of injury, n = 7) and 86° (range 60–110°) for the chronic group (operation on average 46 days after injury, range 21–120 days, n = 7). Longer delay from injury was associated with a decreased total range of motion ( P = 0.028). Further subluxation occurred in three chronic group patients, one required further surgery. The key to successful treatment of this injury is the re-establishment of joint congruity and early mobilization. With appropriate patient selection, pain free, satisfactory range of motion can be achieved. There is a risk of persistent subluxation or dislocation, particularly if treatment is delayed.

Post-Reduction Stability of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint after Dorsal Fracture Dislocation—A Cadaveric Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (03) ◽  
pp. 382-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andre Eu-Jin Cheah ◽  
Tun-Lin Foo ◽  
Janice Chin-Yi Liao ◽  
Min He ◽  
Alphonsus Khin-Sze Chong
Keyword(s):  
Traction Force ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Full Extension ◽  
Early Motion ◽  
Fracture Dislocations ◽  
Reduction Stability ◽  
The One

Background: Proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) dorsal fracture dislocations (DFD) are challenging injuries. Treatment aims to achieve stability of the PIPJ after reduction so that early motion can be initiated. We studied how increasing articular destruction would affect post reduction stability and investigate the amount of traction and PIPJ flexion needed to maintain the reduction. Methods: Increasing amounts (20%, 40% and 60%) of damage to the volar lip of the middle phalanx in cadaveric specimens were created to represent PIPJ DFD that were stable, of tenuous stability and frankly unstable. Traction forces and PIPJ flexion needed to maintain the reduction were then measured. Results: The PIPJ DFD with 20% damage were stable and did not subluxe while the one with 40% articular involvement was stable after reduction. For unstable the PIPJ with 60% involvement, the more the PIPJ was flexed, the less traction force was needed to hold the joint in reduction. For PIPJ flexion of 20 degrees, a minimum 4.4N of force is needed to maintain reduction while PIPJ flexion of 10 degrees required a minimum 5.0N of force. No amount of force could maintain PIPJ reduction if traction was performed in full extension. Conclusions: In our model, PIPJ DFD with less than 30% articular damage are stable while those with 30% to 50% of involvement have tenuous stability. For the unstable PIPJ DFD, traction obviates the need for excessive flexion of the PIPJ to maintain joint reduction. This information should be considered in treatment modalities for PIPJ DFD, as well in the design of external traction devices for the treatment of PIPJ DFD.

Results of Treatment of Chronic Dorsal Fracture-Dislocations of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joints of the Fingers

1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 798-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. ISHIDA ◽  
Y. IKUTA
Keyword(s):  
Articular Cartilage ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Results Of Treatment ◽  
Palmar Plate ◽  
Fracture Dislocations

We reviewed 20 cases of chronic dorsal fracture-dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joint, with a mean follow-up period of 74 months. In patients without comminuted palmar fragments, open reduction and internal fixation or osteotomy of the malunited fragment provided good results. In treating patients with damaged articular cartilage or with comminuted palmar fragments by palmar plate arthroplasty, poor results were obtained because of secondary osteoarthritic changes.

Volar plating versus external fixation for unstable dorsal fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint

2021 ◽  
pp. 175319342110593
Author(s):  
Atsuhiko Murayama ◽  
Kentaro Watanabe ◽  
Hideyuki Ota ◽  
Shigeru Kurimoto ◽  
Hitoshi Hirata
Keyword(s):  
External Fixation ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Volar Plating ◽  
Distal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Active Flexion ◽  
Plate Group ◽  
Fracture Dislocations ◽  
Distal Interphalangeal

We retrospectively compared the results of volar plating and dynamic external fixation for acute unstable dorsal fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint with a depressed fragment. We treated 31 patients (31 fingers), 12 with volar buttress plating and 19 with dynamic external fixation. Follow-up averaged 35 and 40 months in the two groups, with a minimal 6-month follow-up. Average active flexion of the proximal interphalangeal joint was 95° after plate fixation and 87° after external fixation, with an active extension lag of –6° and –9°, respectively. Active flexion at the distal interphalangeal joint averaged 67° in the plate group and 58° in the external fixation group, with active extension lags of 0° and –5°, respectively. We conclude that both methods can obtain a good range of motion at the proximal interphalangeal joint. A limitation of the extension of the distal interphalangeal joint occurred with dynamic external fixation but not with volar buttress plating. Level of evidence: IV

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document