scholarly journals BAROREFLEX ACTIVATION THERAPY REDUCES HOSPITAL RESOURCE UTILIZATION IN PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE AND REDUCED EJECTION FRACTION

2014 ◽  
Vol 63 (12) ◽  
pp. A923 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edoardo Gronda ◽  
Giuseppe Costantino ◽  
Tiziana Staine ◽  
Andrea Moneta ◽  
ndrea Casini ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Zile ◽  
JoAnn Lindenfeld ◽  
Fred A. Weaver ◽  
Faiez Zannad ◽  
Elizabeth Galle ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-14
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Schmidt ◽  
Clarissa Garcia Rodrigues ◽  
Kelen Heinrich Schmidt ◽  
Maria Claudia Costa Irigoyen

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edoardo Gronda ◽  
Gianmaria Brambilla ◽  
Eric G. Lovett ◽  
Giuseppe Costantino ◽  
Dimitrios Georgakpoulos ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Muhammad Shahzeb Khan ◽  
Stephen J. Greene ◽  
Anne S. Hellkamp ◽  
Adam D. DeVore ◽  
Xian Shen ◽  
...  

Background: Diuretics are a mainstay therapy for the symptomatic treatment of heart failure. However, in contemporary US outpatient practice, the degree to which diuretic dosing changes over time and the associations with clinical outcomes and health care resource utilization are unknown. Methods: Among 3426 US outpatients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in the Change the Management of Patients with Heart Failure registry with complete medication data and who were prescribed a loop diuretic, diuretic dose increase was defined as: (1) change to a total daily dose higher than their previous total daily dose, (2) addition of metolazone to the regimen, (3) change from furosemide to either bumetanide or torsemide, and the change persists for at least 7 days. Adjusted hazard ratios or rate ratios along with 95% CIs were reported for clinical outcomes among patients with an increase in oral diuretic dose versus no increase in diuretic dose. Results: Overall, 796 (23%) had a diuretic dose increase (18 episodes per 100 patient-years). The proportion of patients with dyspnea at rest (38% versus 26%), dyspnea at exertion (79% versus 67%), orthopnea (32% versus 21%), edema (60% versus 43%), and weight gain (40% versus 23%) were significantly (all P <0.001) higher in the diuretic increase group. Baseline angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (hazard ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.65–0.87]) use were associated with lower likelihood of diuretic increase over time. Patients with a diuretic dose increase had a significantly higher number of heart failure hospitalizations (rate ratio, 2.53 [95% CI, 2.10–3.05]), emergency department visits (rate ratio, 1.84 [95% CI, 1.56–2.17]), and home health visits (rate ratio, 1.88 [95% CI, 1.39–2.54]), but not all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.89–1.36]). Similarly, greater furosemide dose equivalent increases were associated with greater resource utilization but not with mortality, compared with smaller increases. Conclusions: In this contemporary US registry, 1 in 4 patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction had outpatient escalation of diuretic therapy over longitudinal follow-up, and these patients were more likely to have sign/symptoms of congestion. Outpatient diuretic dose escalation of any magnitude was associated with heart failure hospitalizations and resource utilization, but not all-cause mortality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document