scholarly journals A COMPREHENSIVE COMPARISON OF THE PATHOPHYSIOLOGICAL AND PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF CORONARY FLOW RESERVE AND THE INDEX OF MICROVASCULAR RESISTANCE IN THE CULPRIT CORONARY ARTERY OF PATIENTS WITH ACUTE ST-ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

2016 ◽  
Vol 67 (13) ◽  
pp. 383
Author(s):  
David Carrick ◽  
Caroline Haig ◽  
Jamie Layland ◽  
Nadeem Ahmed ◽  
Margaret McEntegart ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Mochula ◽  
OV Mochula ◽  
AN Maltseva ◽  
DA Vorobyeva ◽  
VV Ryabov ◽  
...  

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): grant of the President of the Russian Federation Background. In recent years a group of patients with acute myocardial infarction without obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA) is of interest. In this group of patients, there is a lack of information related to myocardial perfusion, blood flow and reserve, which could be important in term of risk and prognosis assessment. Purpose. To assess the global and regional myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve impairment in MINOCA patients compared to cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Methods. The study group comprised 28 patients (18 male, mean 62.9 ± 10.7years) with acute coronary syndrome. Based on ICA results all patients were divided into two groups: 1) MINOCA (n = 11); 2) patients with myocardial infarction with obstructive CAD (MICAD) (n = 17). A total of 12/17 (71%) MICAD patients underwent PCI with stenting; in 2/12 cases two arteries were revascularized. Within 7-10 days after admission to the hospital all patients underwent SPECT myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) with the assessment of standard indices (SSS, SRS, SDS) and quantitative parameters: rest MBF (rMBF), stress MBF (sMBF) and CFR (on CZT gamma-camera). Also, all patients underwent CMR with evaluation of infarct size (IF), microvascular obstruction (MVO), size of myocardial edema (ME) and transmural extent of myocardial infarction (TE). Results Visual analysis showed that SSS differed significantly (p = 0.001) among MINOCA and MICAD groups: 5 (3;6) vs 10 (5;13), respectively. According to the quantitative MPS data analysis, global sMBF and CFR values were significantly higher in MINOCA than in MICAD patients group: 1.2 (0.82;1.69) ml/min/g vs 0.62 (0.52;0.9) ml/min/g; 1.96 (1.23;2.42) vs 1.16 (0.98;1.64) , respectively. CMR indices such as IS, ME and TE were significantly lower in MINOCA compared to MICAD patients: 1.6 (0;7.8) vs 14.8 (6.3;22.6)%; 8(0;14) vs 18.5 (10;23)%; 0 (0;5) vs 18 (10;25), respectively. Seven(40%) MICAD group patients showed MVO, whereas there were no such patients in MINIOCA group. The regional analysis revealed that sMBF and CFR were significantly lower in LV regions characterized by myocardial injury compared to non-injured regions (based on CMR data): 0.78 (0.51;0.94) ml/min/g vs 1.11 (0.82;1.4) and 1.22 (0.91;1.74) vs 1.52 (1.14;2.42), respectively. Also, we found out significant correlation between regional quantitative SPECT indices and transmural extent of myocardial infarction evaluated by CMR: r=–0.4 for sMBF; r=–0.35 for CFR (p < 0.05). Conclusion. The analysis of quantitative MPS SPECT parameters showed that such approach allows identifying MBF and CFR disturbances both on global and regional level. These results showed that MINOCA patients characterized by mild reduction of myocardial blood flow and perfusion assessed visually and quantitatively. It means that despite the absence of obstructive coronary artery lesion this group of patients has more pronounced risk of cardiac events and need more aggressive observation and treatment.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Basmah Safdar ◽  
Gail D’Onofrio ◽  
James Dziura ◽  
Raymond R Russell ◽  
Caitlin Johnson ◽  
...  

Aims: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is common in patients with non-obstructive coronary arteries but has not been described in low-risk symptomatic patients. We therefore assessed the prevalence and characteristics of CMD in low to moderate risk patients with chest pain in an emergency department. Methods and results: We used three-dimensional Rb82 cardiac positron emission tomography/computed tomography to diagnose coronary artery disease (known or new regional defect, any coronary calcification) and CMD (low coronary flow reserve without coronary artery disease) in chest pain patients after being ruled out for acute myocardial infarction. Exclusions included age 30 years or less, acute myocardial infarction, hemodynamic instability, heart failure and dialysis. Among 195 participants undergoing cardiac positron emission tomography/computed tomography, 42% had CMD, 36% had coronary artery disease and 22% had normal flows; 70% were women and 84% were obese. Patients with CMD and coronary artery disease had significantly lower coronary flow reserve than normal patients (mean coronary flow reserve 1.6 and 1.9 vs. 2.6, respectively, P<0.05). However, CMD patients were younger (mean age 51 vs. 61 years), and had fewer traditional cardiac risk factors ( P<0.05) than patients with coronary artery disease. Nearly one third (31%) of patients had a prior emergency department visit for chest pain within three years of index presentation. Women were four times as likely to have CMD as men (adjusted odds ratio 4.2; 95% confidence interval 1.8, 9.6) after controlling for age, race, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, dyslipidemia, obesity and family history of coronary artery disease. Conclusions: Despite their low-risk profile, nearly one half of symptomatic and mostly obese emergency department patients without evidence of myocardial infarction or coronary artery disease had CMD. The results could explain the high rates of return visits associated with chest pain, although their application to the general emergency department population require validation.


Heart ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 102 (Suppl 4) ◽  
pp. A1.2-A1
Author(s):  
David Carrick ◽  
Caroline Haig ◽  
Nadeem Ahmed ◽  
Margaret McEntegart ◽  
Mark C Petrie ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 21-25
Author(s):  
Lara Hadži-Tanović ◽  
Nikola Bošković ◽  
Srđan Dedić ◽  
Branko Beleslin

Introduction: Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR) is a clinically useful, non-invasive diagnostic method for assessing the functional ability of coronary arteries and it is important for their long-term follow-up in patients. However, CFR has not always been sufficiently investigated in previous studies. Objective: To examine the prognostic significance of CFR in the risk stratification of patients with chronic total occlusion of the right coronary artery (RCA) and the intermediary stenosis of the left coronary artery (LAD). Material and Methods: Number of 71 patients, mean age 64 ± 7 years, (84%) patients male, having LAD stenosis, diameter 50-70%, and CTO of RCA, were referred for noninvasive estimation of functional significance of LAD stenosis. Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography was used to obtain coronary flow velocities in the distal segment of LAD. Patients were followed for the mean period of 18.3 ± 7.1 months for the occurrence of composite end point including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, bypass surgery and PCI. Results: During the follow-up period, there were a total of 23 adverse events (4 deaths, 2 myocardial infarction, 7 bypass surgeries and 10 PCI). Patients with CFR < 2 had significantly more adverse events (n = 9; 56.3% vs. n = 14; 25.5%; p = 0.021), they were significantly older (68 ± 9 vs. 62 ± 6; p = 0.011), with a higher incidence of a positive family history (14; 87.5% vs. 26; 47.3%; p = 0.039), as well as a significantly higher frequency of three-dose coronary disease (14; 87.5% vs. 30; 54.5%; p = 0.017). Using Kaplan-Meier estimator, we obtained that patients with CFR < 2 have a significantly shorter average period without unwanted event (15.4 ± 2.8 months vs 23.5 ± 1.1 months, Log Rank 7.407; p = 0.008). Conclusion: CFR plays an important role in stratifying the risk of patients with CTO of RCA and the intermediary stenosis of LAD.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (17) ◽  
pp. 1434-1443
Author(s):  
Roberto Scarsini ◽  
Giovanni Luigi De Maria ◽  
Mayooran Shanmuganathan ◽  
Rafail A. Kotronias ◽  
Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document