Relation Between Coronary Tortuosity and Vasomotor Dysfunction in Patients Without Obstructed Coronaries?

Background: A large proportion of patients with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) has underlying coronary vasomotor dysfunction (CVDys), which can be diagnosed by a coronary function test (CFT). Coronary tortuosity is a common angiographic finding during the CFT. Yet, no data exist on the association between vasomotor dysfunction and coronary tortuosity.Aim: To investigate the association between CVDys and coronary tortuosity in patients with ANOCAMethods: All consecutive ANOCA patients who underwent clinically indicated CFT between February 2019 and November 2020 were included. CFT included acetylcholine spasm testing to diagnose epicardial or microvascular spasm, and adenosine testing to diagnose microvascular dysfunction (MVD). MVD was defined as an index of microvascular resistance (IMR) ≥ 25 and/or coronary flow reserve (CFR) <2.0. Coronary tortuosity, was scored (no, mild, moderate or severe) based on the angles of the curvatures in the left anterior descending (LAD) artery on angiography.Results: In total, 228 patients were included (86% female, mean age 56 ± 9 years). We found coronary artery spasm in 81% of patients and MVD in 45% of patients (15%: abnormal CFR, 30%: abnormal IMR). There were 73 patients with no tortuosity, 114 with mild tortuosity, 41 with moderate tortuosity, and no patients with severe tortuosity. No differences were found in cardiovascular risk factors or medical history, and the prevalence of CVDys did not differ between the no tortuosity, mild tortuosity and moderate tortuosity group (82, 82, and 85%, respectively).Conclusion: In this study, CVDys was not associated with coronary tortuosity. Future experimental and clinical studies on the complex interplay between coronary tortuosity, wall shear stress, endothelial dysfunction and coronary flow are warranted.

Sex Differences in Coronary Function Test Results in Patient With Angina and Nonobstructive Disease

Introduction: Invasive coronary function testing (CFT) has become the recommended diagnostic tool to assess the various endotypes of coronary vasomotor dysfunction in patients with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA), which has implications for therapy and prognosis. Although the expanding performance of CFT is leading to increased knowledge of coronary vasomotor dysfunction, little is known about sex-related differences in the results of comprehensive CFT.Methods: We conducted a prospective study of all consecutive patients with ANOCA that underwent clinically indicated CFT in a tertiary interventional from February 2019 to February 2021. CFT consisted of acetylcholine testing to diagnose epicardial or microvascular spasm, and adenosine testing to diagnose CMD. CMD was defined as an index of microvascular resistance (IMR) ≥ 25 and/or coronary flow reserve (CFR) < 2.0.Results: In total, 228 women and 38 men underwent CFT. No differences in traditional risk factors were seen, but women had a higher prevalence of migraine (45 vs. 14%, p = 0.001). Men more often had a history of percutaneous coronary intervention (12 vs. 49%, p = 0.001). We found no difference in clinical presentation. Coronary vasomotor dysfunction was present in 95% of men and 88% of women (p = 0.25), but males show more often epicardial spasm and less microvascular spasm than women (63 vs. 42% and 29 vs. 40% respectively, p = 0.039). Impaired CFR was more prevalent among females (6 vs 20%, p = 0.033). IMR [median of 23 (15–32) vs. 19 (13–25), p = 0.08] did not differ between the sexes.Conclusion: Men undergoing CFT show a comparable prevalence of coronary vascular dysfunction as women. However, men have a higher prevalence of epicardial spasm and a lower prevalence of microvascular spasm compared with women. An impaired CFR was more often present in women, with an equally impairment of IMR.

Adenosine‐Induced Coronary Steal Is Observed in Patients Presenting With ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Background Adenosine is used to treat no‐reflow in the infarct‐related artery (IRA) during ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction intervention. However, the physiological effect of adenosine in the IRA is variable. Coronary steal—a reduction of blood flow to the distal coronary bed—can occur in response to adenosine and this is facilitated by collaterals. We investigated the effects of adenosine on coronary flow reserve (CFR) in patients presenting with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction to better understand the physiological mechanism underpinning the variable response to adenosine. Methods and Results Pressure‐wire assessment of the IRA after percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in 93 patients presenting with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction to calculate index of microvascular resistance, CFR, and collateral flow index by pressure. Modified collateral Rentrop grade to the IRA was recorded, as was microvascular obstruction by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Coronary steal (CFR <0.9), no change in flow (CFR=0.9–1.1), and hyperemic flow (CFR >1.1) after adenosine occurred in 19 (20%), 15 (16%), and 59 (63%) patients, respectively. Patients with coronary steal had higher modified Rentrop score to the IRA (1 [0, 1.75] versus 0 [0, 1], P <0.001) and a higher collateral flow index by pressure (0.25±0.10 versus 0.15±0.10, P =0.004) than the hyperemic group. The coronary steal group also had significantly higher index of microvascular resistance (61.68 [28.13, 87.04] versus 23.93 [14.67, 37.00], P =0.006) and had more disease (stenosis >50%) in the donor arteries (52.63% versus 22.03%, P =0.02) than the hyperemic group. Conclusions Adenosine‐induced coronary steal may be responsible for a reduction in coronary flow reserve in a proportion of patients presenting with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03145194. URL: https://www.isrctn.com ; Unique identifier: ISRCTN3176727.

Simplified Assessment of the Index of Microvascular Resistance

Background. To validate a simplified invasive method for the calculation of the index of microvascular resistance (IMR). Methods. This is a prospective, single-center study of patients with chronic coronary syndromes presenting with nonobstructive coronary artery disease. IMR was obtained using both intravenous (IV) adenosine and intracoronary (IC) papaverine. Each IMR measurement was obtained in duplicate. The primary objective was the agreement between IMR acquired using adenosine and papaverine. Secondary objectives include reproducibility of IMR and time required for the IMR measurement. Results. One hundred and sixteen IMR measurements were performed in 29 patients. The mean age was 68.8 ± 7.24 years, and 27.6% was diabetics. IMR values were similar between papaverine and adenosine (17.7 ± 7.26 and 20.1 ± 8.6, p = 0.25 ; Passing-Bablok coefficient A 0.58, 95% CI −2.42 to 3.53; coefficient B 0.90, 95% CI −0.74 to 1.07). The reproducibility of IMR was excellent with both adenosine and papaverine (ICC 0.78, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.88 and ICC 0.93, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.97). The time needed for microvascular assessment was significantly shortened by the use of IC papaverine (3.23 (2.84, 3.78) mins vs. 5.48 (4.94, 7.09) mins, p < 0.0001 ). Conclusion. IMR can be reliably measured using IC papaverine with similar results compared to intravenous infusion of adenosine with increased reproducibility and reduced procedural time. This approach simplifies the invasive assessment of the coronary microcirculation in the catheterization laboratory.

GLP-1 vasodilatation in humans with coronary artery disease is not adenosine mediated

Background Incretin therapies appear to provide cardioprotection and improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes, but the mechanism of this effect remains elusive. We have previously shown that glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 is a coronary vasodilator and we sought to investigate if this is an adenosine-mediated effect. Methods We recruited 41 patients having percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stable angina and allocated them into four groups administering a specific study-related infusion following successful PCI: GLP-1 infusion (Group G) (n = 10); Placebo, normal saline infusion (Group P) (n = 11); GLP-1 + Theophylline infusion (Group GT) (n = 10); and Theophylline infusion (Group T) (n = 10). A pressure wire assessment of coronary distal pressure and flow velocity (thermodilution transit time—Tmn) at rest and hyperaemia was performed after PCI and repeated following the study infusion to derive basal and index of microvascular resistance (BMR and IMR). Results There were no significant differences in the demographics of patients recruited to our study. Most of the patients were not diabetic. GLP-1 caused significant reduction of resting Tmn that was not attenuated by theophylline: mean delta Tmn (SD) group G − 0.23 s (0.27) versus group GT − 0.18 s (0.37), p = 0.65. Theophylline alone (group T) did not significantly alter resting flow velocity compared to group GT: delta Tmn in group T 0.04 s (0.15), p = 0.30. The resulting decrease in BMR observed in group G persisted in group GT: − 20.83 mmHg s (24.54 vs. − 21.20 mmHg s (30.41), p = 0.97. GLP-1 did not increase circulating adenosine levels in group GT more than group T: delta median adenosine − 2.0 ng/ml (− 117.1, 14.8) versus − 0.5 ng/ml (− 19.6, 9.4); p = 0.60. Conclusion The vasodilatory effect of GLP-1 is not abolished by theophylline and GLP-1 does not increase adenosine levels, indicating an adenosine-independent mechanism of GLP-1 coronary vasodilatation. Trial registration: The local research ethics committee approved the study (National Research Ethics Service-NRES Committee, East of England): REC reference 14/EE/0018. The study was performed according to institutional guidelines, was registered on http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (unique identifier: NCT03502083) and the study conformed to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Coronary Angiography-Derived Index of Microvascular Resistance

A coronary angiography-derived index of microvascular resistance (caIMR) is proposed for physiological assessment of microvasular diseases in coronary circulation. The aim of the study is to assess diagnostic performance of caIMR, using wire-derived index of microvascular resistance (IMR) as the reference standard. IMR was demonstrated in 56 patients (57 vessels) with stable/unstable angina pectoris and no obstructive coronary arteries in three centers using the Certus pressure wire. Based on the aortic pressure wave and coronary angiograms from two projections, the caIMR was computed and assessed in blinded fashion against the IMR at an independent core laboratory. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the caIMR with a cutoff value of 25 were 84.2% (95% CI: 72.1% to 92.5%), 86.1% (95% CI: 70.5% to 95.3%), 81.0% (95% CI: 58.1% to 94.6%), 88.6% (95% CI: 76.1% to 95.0%), and 77.3% (95% CI: 59.5% to 88.7%) against the IMR with a cutoff value of 25. The receiver-operating curve had area under the curve of 0.919 and the correlation coefficient equaled to 0.746 between caIMR and wire-derived IMR. Hence, caIMR could eliminate the need of a pressure wire, reduce technical error, and potentially increase adoption of physiological assessment of microvascular diseases in patients with ischemic heart disease.

Thermodilution-Based Invasive Assessment of Absolute Coronary Blood Flow and Microvascular Resistance: Quantification of Microvascular (Dys)Function?

During the last two decades, there has been a sharp increase in both interest and knowledge about the coronary microcirculation. Since these small vessels are not visible by the human eye, physiologic measurements should be used to characterize their function. The invasive methods presently used (coronary flow reserve (CFR) and index of microvascular resistance (IMR)) are operator-dependent and mandate the use of adenosine to induce hyperemia. In recent years, a new thermodilution-based method for measurement of absolute coronary blood flow and microvascular resistance has been proposed and initial procedural problems have been overcome. Presently, the technique is easy to perform using the Rayflow infusion catheter and the Coroventis software. The method is accurate, reproducible, and completely operator-independent. This method has been validated noninvasively against the current golden standard for flow assessment: Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PET-CT). In addition, absolute flow and resistance measurements have proved to be safe, both periprocedurally and at long-term follow-up. With an increasing number of studies being performed, this method has great potential for better understanding and quantification of microvascular disease.

GLP-1 Vasodilatation in Humans With Coronary Artery Disease is Not Adenosine Mediated.

Background Incretin therapies appear to provide cardioprotection and improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes, but the mechanism of this effect remains elusive. We have previously shown that glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 is a coronary vasodilator and we sought to investigate if this is an adenosine-mediated effect.Methods We recruited 41 patients having percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stable angina and allocated them into four groups administering a specific study-related infusion following successful PCI: GLP-1 infusion (Group G) (n=10); Placebo, normal saline infusion (Group P) (n=11); GLP-1 + Theophylline infusion (Group GT)(n=10); and Theophylline infusion (Group T) (n=10). A pressure wire assessment of coronary distal pressure and flow velocity (thermodilution transit time – Tmn) at rest and hyperaemia was performed after PCI and repeated following the study infusion to derive basal and index of microvascular resistance (BMR and IMR). Results There were no significant differences in the demographics of patients recruited to our study. Most of the patients were not diabetic. GLP-1 caused significant reduction of resting Tmn that was not attenuated by theophylline: mean delta Tmn (SD) group G -0.23s (0.27) vs. group GT -0.18s (0.37), p=0.65. Theophylline alone (group T) did not significantly alter resting flow velocity compared to group GT: delta Tmn in group T 0.04s (0.15), p=0.30. The resulting decrease in BMR observed in group G persisted in group GT: -20.83 mmHg.s (24.54 vs. -21.20mmHg.s (30.41), p=0.97. GLP-1 did not increase circulating adenosine levels in group GT more than group T: delta median adenosine -2.0 ng/ml (-117.1, 14.8) vs. -0.5 ng/ml (-19.6, 9.4); p=0.60.Conclusion The vasodilatory effect of GLP-1 is not abolished by theophylline and GLP-1 does not increase adenosine levels, indicating an adenosine-independent mechanism of GLP-1 coronary vasodilatation.Trial Registration The local research ethics committee approved the study: REC reference 14/EE/0018. The study was performed according to institutional guidelines, was registered on http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (unique identifier: NCT03502083) and the study conformed to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

GLP-1 vasodilatation in humans with coronary artery disease is not adenosine mediated.

Background Incretin therapies appear to provide cardioprotection and improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes, but the mechanism of this effect remains elusive. We have previously shown that glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 is a coronary vasodilator and we sought to investigate if this is an adenosine-mediated effect.Methods We recruited 41 patients having percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stable angina and allocated them into four groups administering a specific study-related infusion following successful PCI: GLP-1 infusion (Group G) (n = 10); Placebo, normal saline infusion (Group P) (n = 11); GLP-1 + Theophylline infusion (Group GT)(n = 10); and Theophylline infusion (Group T) (n = 10). A pressure wire assessment of coronary distal pressure and flow velocity (thermodilution transit time – Tmn) at rest and hyperaemia was performed after PCI and repeated following the study infusion to derive basal and index of microvascular resistance (BMR and IMR).Results There were no significant differences in the demographics of patients recruited to our study. Most of the patients were not diabetic. GLP-1 caused significant reduction of resting Tmn that was not attenuated by theophylline: mean delta Tmn (SD) group G -0.23 s (0.27) vs. group GT -0.18 s (0.37), p = 0.65. Theophylline alone (group T) did not significantly alter resting flow velocity compared to group GT: delta Tmn in group T 0.04 s (0.15), p = 0.30. The resulting decrease in BMR observed in group G persisted in group GT: -20.83 mmHg.s (24.54 vs. -21.20 mmHg.s (30.41), p = 0.97. GLP-1 did not increase circulating adenosine levels in group GT more than group T: delta median adenosine − 2.0 ng/ml (-117.1, 14.8) vs. -0.5 ng/ml (-19.6, 9.4); p = 0.60.Conclusion The vasodilatory effect of GLP-1 is not abolished by theophylline and GLP-1 does not increase adenosine levels, indicating an adenosine-independent mechanism of GLP-1 coronary vasodilatation..