scholarly journals A myocardial perfusion reserve index in humans using first-pass contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

1999 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 1386-1394 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.H.S. Cullen ◽  
M.A. Horsfield ◽  
C.R. Reek ◽  
G.R. Cherryman ◽  
D.B. Barnett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Myocardial Perfusion ◽  
Myocardial Perfusion Reserve ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Perfusion Reserve ◽  
Myocardial Perfusion Reserve Index ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
First Pass

scholarly journals Molecular Mechanisms of Adenosine Stress T1 Mapping

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soham A. Shah ◽  
Claire E. Reagan ◽  
Brent A. French ◽  
Frederick H. Epstein
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Myocardial Perfusion ◽  
Perfusion Imaging ◽  
T1 Mapping ◽  
Myocardial Perfusion Reserve ◽  
Adenosine Stress ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Perfusion Reserve

Background: Adenosine stress T1 mapping is an emerging magnetic resonance imaging method to investigate coronary vascular function and myocardial ischemia without application of a contrast agent. Using gene-modified mice and 2 vasodilators, we elucidated and compared the mechanisms of adenosine myocardial perfusion imaging and adenosine T1 mapping. Methods: Wild-type (WT), A 2A AR −/− (adenosine A 2A receptor knockout), A 2B AR −/− (adenosine A 2B receptor knockout), A 3 AR −/− (adenosine A 3 receptor knockout), and eNOS −/− (endothelial nitric oxide synthase knockout) mice underwent rest and stress perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (n=8) and T1 mapping (n=10) using either adenosine, regadenoson (a selective A 2A AR agonist), or saline. Myocardial blood flow and T1 were computed from perfusion imaging and T1 mapping, respectively, at rest and stress to assess myocardial perfusion reserve and T1 reactivity (ΔT1). Changes in heart rate for each stress agent were also calculated. Two-way ANOVA was used to detect differences in each parameter between the different groups of mice. Results: Myocardial perfusion reserve was significantly reduced only in A 2A AR −/− compared to WT mice using adenosine (1.06±0.16 versus 2.03±0.52, P <0.05) and regadenoson (0.98±026 versus 2.13±0.75, P <0.05). In contrast, adenosine ΔT1 was reduced compared with WT mice (3.88±1.58) in both A 2A AR −/− (1.63±1.32, P <0.05) and A 2B AR −/− (1.55±1.35, P <0.05). Furthermore, adenosine ΔT1 was halved in eNOS −/− (1.76±1.46, P <0.05) versus WT mice. Regadenoson ΔT1 was approximately half of adenosine ΔT1 in WT mice (1.97±1.50, P <0.05), and additionally, it was significantly reduced in eNOS −/− mice (−0.22±1.46, P <0.05). Lastly, changes in heart rate was 2× greater using regadenoson versus adenosine in all groups except A 2A AR −/− , where heart rate remained constant. Conclusions: The major findings are that (1) although adenosine myocardial perfusion reserve is mediated through the A 2A receptor, adenosine ΔT1 is mediated through the A 2A and A 2B receptors, (2) adenosine myocardial perfusion reserve is endothelial independent while adenosine ΔT1 is partially endothelial dependent, and (3) ΔT1 mediated through the A 2A receptor is endothelial dependent while ΔT1 mediated through the A 2B receptor is endothelial independent.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document