Migration of porous press-fit cups in hip revision arthroplasty

1996 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 390-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Nivbrant ◽  
Johan Kärrholm ◽  
Ingemar Önsten ◽  
Åke Carlsson ◽  
Finnur Snorrason
2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 615-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. M. C. Mathijssen ◽  
P. D. Sturm ◽  
P. Pilot ◽  
R. M. Bloem ◽  
P. Buma ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 32-38
Author(s):  
N. V Zagorodniy ◽  
V. I Nuzhdin ◽  
K. M Bukhtin ◽  
S. V Kagramanov

Treatment results for 114 total hip revision arthroplasties (1992—2011) with cemented femur components were analyzed. The most common indication for surgery was aseptic instability of hip implant. In 1 st group (42 operations) cemented stems Bi-Metric (Biomet Orthopaedics) and in 2 nd group (72 operations) cemented stems ESI (Endoservis) were used. Surgical technique was described and causes of complication development were analyzed. Mean follow-up made up 11 years. In the 1 st group excellent results were achieved in 2 (4.76%) cases, good in 34 (80.95%), satisfactory in 3 (7.14%) and poor in 3 (7.14%) cases. In the 2 nd group corresponding results were achieved in 3 (4.17%), 47 (65.28%), 15 (20.83%) and 7(9.72) respectively. Analysis of the reasons for complication development was performed. It was stated that femur defects of type 3 on level 1 by AAOS classification resulted in fatigue fractures of cemented revision stems.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Schuh ◽  
Ralph Schuh ◽  
Albert Fujak ◽  
Wolfgang Hönle ◽  
Sandeep Kashyap

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduard Tornero ◽  
Arturo Pereira ◽  
Jessica Bravo ◽  
Silvia Angulo ◽  
Misericordia Basora ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 122 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Schmidt ◽  
M. Porsch ◽  
C. Sulk ◽  
J. Hillekamp ◽  
T. Schneider

2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 901-905 ◽  
Author(s):  
John I. Khoury ◽  
Arthur L. Malkani ◽  
Edward M. Adler ◽  
David C. Markel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document