Long-term stability of Class II, Division 1, nonextraction cervical face-bow therapy: I. Model analysis

1996 ◽  
Vol 109 (3) ◽  
pp. 271-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.N. Elms ◽  
P.H. Buschang ◽  
R.G. Alexander
2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 331-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Sood ◽  
Om Kharbanda ◽  
R Duggal ◽  
M Sood ◽  
S Gulati

Purpose: To evaluate the muscle response in order to determine the mechanism of neuromuscular adaptations with Forsus Fatigue Resistant DeviceTM which has greater elasticity and flexibility; allows greater range of movement of mandible; is available in pre fabricated assembly of springs, tubes and rods and is a simple, effective and reliable corrective appliance that benefits not only growing patients but also malocclusions that previously required extractions, headgears and surgery. Method: Bilateral EMG activity from anterior temporalis and masseter muscles was monitored longitudinally on 10 young growing females with Class II Division 1 malocclusion to determine changes in postural, swallowing, and maximal voluntary clenching over an observation period of 6 months. Results: There was a significant decrease in the muscle activity at one month after Forsus Fatigue Resistant DeviceTM insertion during swallowing of saliva and maximal voluntary clenching which gradually returned to pre treatment levels at the end of six months.Conclusion: This study suggests that Forsus Fatigue Resistant DeviceTM should be given for at least six months to allow for adequate neuromuscular adaptations to occur for long term stability of the result.


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katri Keski-Nisula ◽  
Leo Keski-Nisula ◽  
Juha Varrela

Summary Objectives Our aim was to analyse dentoskeletal effects and long-term stability of Class II treatment carried out with an eruption guidance appliance (EGA) in early mixed dentition. Materials and methods Sixty-five Class II patients (38 females and 27 males), treated with an EGA in early mixed dentition, were compared with 58 children (26 females and 32 males) with untreated Class II malocclusion. The mean age in the treatment group at the start (T1) and end of treatment (T2) was 5.4 years (±0.4) and 8.5 years (±0.9), respectively, and at the final examination in the early permanent dentition (T3) 16.7 years (±0.4). In the control group, the mean age at T1 and T2 were 5.1 years (±0.5) and 8.4 years (±0.5), respectively. The independent and dependent sample t-tests, Chi-square test, and Fisher’s test were used in the statistical evaluation. Results In the treatment group, the frequency of Class II decreased from 100 to 14% during the treatment (T1–T2) and a significant correction took place in all occlusal variables. At T2, the treatment and control groups showed statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) in all occlusal variables. In the treated children, mandibular length increased 5 mm more (P < 0.001) from T1 to T2 compared to the control children, and the ANB angle became significantly smaller (P = 0.006). During the post-treatment period (T2–T3), the frequency of Class II in the treatment group decreased from 14 to 2% (P < 0.05), overbite increased from 2.2 to 3.1 mm (P < 0.05), and lower crowding increased from 2to 14% (P < 0.05). Post-treatment changes in overjet and upper crowding were not statistically significant. At T3, the mean values of the SNA, SNB, and ANB angles were 83.0° (SD 3.9°), 81.3° (SD 3.8°), and 2.4° (SD 1.5°), respectively. Conclusions A clinically significant correction of the molar relationship, overjet, overbite, incisor alignment, and growth enhancement of the mandible were observed after treatment in early mixed dentition. The treatment results remained largely stable in the early permanent dentition. However, an increase was observed in overbite and lower crowding. None of the children treated in early mixed dentition needed a second treatment phase.


2017 ◽  
Vol 152 (5) ◽  
pp. 663-671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilla Fiedler Foncatti ◽  
José Fernando Castanha Henriques ◽  
Guilherme Janson ◽  
Waleska Caldas ◽  
Daniela Gamba Garib

1975 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. 697-698
Author(s):  
Peter E. Paulos ◽  
Robert S. Portenga ◽  
Richard D. Seabold

2007 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazunori Fukui ◽  
Raymond M. Sugiyama ◽  
Ronald M. Kaminishi ◽  
Yoshiaki Matsuyama ◽  
Eiko Kuroda ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 72-79
Author(s):  
André da Costa Monini ◽  
Luiz Gonzaga Gandini Júnior ◽  
Luiz Guilherme Martins Maia ◽  
Ary dos Santos-Pinto

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated posteroanterior cephalograms before and after treatment and long term follow-up of Class II division 1 patients treated with bionator. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to demonstrate the transverse growth of maxilla and mandible during and after bionator therapy. METHODS: Measurement of transverse dimensions between posterior maxillary and mandibular implants, as well as the distances between the buccal, gonial and antegonial points were recorded. Measurements were analyzed at three periods: T1 = before bionator therapy, T2 = after bionator therapy and T3 = 5.74 years after T2. RESULTS: There was statistically significant transverse increase due to growth and/or treatment for all variables, except for the distance between the anterior maxillary implants. CONCLUSIONS: During the study period only the anterior maxillary area did not show transverse growth.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document