Neural correlates of single word processing: an MEG study

NeuroImage ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sven Braeutigam ◽  
Fiona McNab ◽  
Stephen Swithenby ◽  
Anthony Bailey
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 ◽  
pp. 172-178
Author(s):  
P. Neumeister ◽  
B. Gathmann ◽  
D. Hofmann ◽  
K. Feldker ◽  
C.Y. Heitmann ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 1250-1260
Author(s):  
Anna E. Middleton ◽  
Julie M. Schneider ◽  
Mandy J. Maguire

Nature ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 331 (6157) ◽  
pp. 585-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. E. Petersen ◽  
P. T. Fox ◽  
M. I. Posner ◽  
M. Mintun ◽  
M. E. Raichle

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Kissler ◽  
Katarzyna Bromberek-Dyzman

We investigate how mood inductions impact the neural processing of emotional adjectives in one’s first language (L1) and a formally acquired second language (L2). Twenty-three student participants took part in an EEG experiment with two separate sessions. Happy or sad mood inductions were followed by series of individually presented positive, negative, or neutral adjectives in L1 (German) or L2 (English) and evaluative decisions had to be performed. Visual event-related potentials elicited during word processing were analyzed during N1 (125–200 ms), Early Posterior Negativities (EPN, 200–300 ms and 300–400 ms), N400 (350–450 ms), and the Late Positive Potential (LPP, 500–700 ms). Mood induction differentially impacted word processing already on the N1, with stronger left lateralization following happy than sad mood induction in L1, but not in L2. Moreover, regardless of language, early valence modulation was found following happy but not sad mood induction. Over occipital areas, happy mood elicited larger amplitudes of the mood-congruent positive words, whereas over temporal areas mood-incongruent negative words had higher amplitudes. In the EPN-windows, effects of mood and valence largely persisted, albeit with no difference between L1 and L2. N400 amplitude was larger for L2 than for L1. On the LPP, mood-incongruent adjectives elicited larger amplitudes than mood-congruent ones. Results reveal a remarkably early valence-general effect of mood induction on cortical processing, in line with previous reports of N1 as a first marker of contextual integration. Interestingly, this effect differed between L1 and L2. Moreover, mood-congruent effects were found in perceptual processing and mood-incongruent ERP amplification in higher-order evaluative stages.


2018 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 729-739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eileen Haebig ◽  
Laurence Leonard ◽  
Evan Usler ◽  
Patricia Deevy ◽  
Christine Weber

Purpose Previous behavioral studies have found deficits in lexical–semantic abilities in children with specific language impairment (SLI), including reduced depth and breadth of word knowledge. This study explored the neural correlates of early emerging familiar word processing in preschoolers with SLI and typical development. Method Fifteen preschoolers with typical development and 15 preschoolers with SLI were presented with pictures followed after a brief delay by an auditory label that did or did not match. Event-related brain potentials were time locked to the onset of the auditory labels. Children provided verbal judgments of whether the label matched the picture. Results There were no group differences in the accuracy of identifying when pictures and labels matched or mismatched. Event-related brain potential data revealed that mismatch trials elicited a robust N400 in both groups, with no group differences in mean amplitude or peak latency. However, the typically developing group demonstrated a more robust late positive component, elicited by mismatch trials. Conclusions These initial findings indicate that lexical–semantic access of early acquired words, indexed by the N400, does not differ between preschoolers with SLI and typical development when highly familiar words are presented in isolation. However, the typically developing group demonstrated a more mature profile of postlexical reanalysis and integration, indexed by an emerging late positive component. The findings lay the necessary groundwork for better understanding processing of newly learned words in children with SLI.


NeuroImage ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 202 ◽  
pp. 116112
Author(s):  
Anastasia Klimovich-Gray ◽  
Mirjana Bozic

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document