Theta burst stimulation of primary motor cortex: double-blind sham controlled studies using functional MRI and transcranial magnetic stimulation

NeuroImage ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. S150
Author(s):  
WD Byblow ◽  
CM Stinear ◽  
JP Coxon ◽  
PA Barber ◽  
TS Verryt ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 102 (2) ◽  
pp. 766-773 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Ragert ◽  
Mickael Camus ◽  
Yves Vandermeeren ◽  
Michael A. Dimyan ◽  
Leonardo G. Cohen

The excitability of the human primary motor cortex (M1) as tested with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) depends on its previous history of neural activity. Homeostatic plasticity might be one important physiological mechanism for the regulation of corticospinal excitability and synaptic plasticity. Although homeostatic plasticity has been demonstrated locally within M1, it is not known whether priming M1 could result in similar homeostatic effects in the homologous M1 of the opposite hemisphere. Here, we sought to determine whether down-regulating excitability (priming) in the right (R) M1 with 1-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) changes the excitability-enhancing effect of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) applied over the homologous left (L) M1. Subjects were randomly allocated to one of four experimental groups in a sham-controlled parallel design with real or sham R M1 1-Hz TMS stimulation always preceding L M1 iTBS or sham by about 10 min. The primary outcome measure was corticospinal excitability in the L M1, as measured by recruitment curves (RCs). Secondary outcome measures included pinch force, simple reaction time, and tapping speed assessed in the right hand. The main finding of this study was that preconditioning R M1 with 1-Hz rTMS significantly decreased the excitability-enhancing effects of subsequent L M1 iTBS on RCs. Application of 1-Hz rTMS over R M1 alone and iTBS over L M1 alone resulted in increased RC in L M1 relative to sham interventions. The present findings are consistent with the hypothesis that homeostatic mechanisms operating across hemispheric boundaries contribute to regulate motor cortical function in the primary motor cortex.


2016 ◽  
Vol 127 (1) ◽  
pp. 740-747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitchell R. Goldsworthy ◽  
Ann-Maree Vallence ◽  
Nicolette A. Hodyl ◽  
John G. Semmler ◽  
Julia B. Pitcher ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 123 (5) ◽  
pp. 1010-1015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helge Hellriegel ◽  
Eva M. Schulz ◽  
Hartwig R. Siebner ◽  
Günther Deuschl ◽  
Jan H. Raethjen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document