Somatosensory areas activated due to moving stimuli on the skin A study using cytoarchitectonic mapping and PET

NeuroImage ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. S415
Author(s):  
A. Bodegård ◽  
S. Geyer ◽  
E. Naito ◽  
K. Zilles ◽  
P.E. Roland
NeuroImage ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. S417 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Bodegård ◽  
S. Geyer ◽  
E. Naito ◽  
K. Zilles ◽  
P.E Roland

NeuroImage ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. S404
Author(s):  
S. Geyer ◽  
U. Bürgel ◽  
A. Schleicher ◽  
K. Zilles ◽  
P.E. Roland

Neuroreport ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 187-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Bodegård ◽  
Stefan Geyer ◽  
Eiichi Naito ◽  
Karl Zilles ◽  
Per E. Roland

1997 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-257
Author(s):  
Franz Mechsner ◽  
Günther Palm

(1) The “timing idea” is not the only interpretation of cerebellar histology worth considering. Therefore, it is not imperative to strive for a theory of cerebellar function which gives it a prominent rôle. (2) The experiments with “moving stimuli” cannot support the tidal wave theory. (3) The notion that only “moving stimuli” can excite the cerebellar cortex is burdened with many intrinsic difficulties. (4) The common theoretical claim that the accuracy of skilled movements is due to exact pattern-matching processes in the cerebellum may be most misleading.


1997 ◽  
Vol 86 (4) ◽  
pp. 670-685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Macchi ◽  
Edward G. Jones

✓ The nomenclature most commonly applied to the motor-related nuclei of the human thalamus differs substantially from that applied to the thalamus of other primates, from which most knowledge of input—output connections is derived. Knowledge of these connections in the human is a prerequisite for stereotactic neurosurgical approaches designed to alleviate movement disorders by the placement of lesions in specific nuclei. Transfer to humans of connectional information derived from experimental studies in nonhuman primates requires agreement about the equivalence of nuclei in the different species, and dialogue between experimentalists and neurosurgeons would be facilitated by the use of a common nomenclature. In this review, the authors compare the different nomenclatures and review the cyto- and chemoarchitecture of the nuclei in the anterolateral aspect of the ventral nuclear mass in humans and monkeys, suggest which nuclei are equivalent, and propose a common terminology. On this basis, it is possible to identify the nuclei of the human motor thalamus that transfer information from the substantia nigra, globus pallidus, cerebellum, and proprioceptive components of the medial lemniscus to prefrontal, premotor, motor, and somatosensory areas of the cerebral cortex. It also becomes possible to suggest the principal functional systems involved in stereotactically guided thalamotomies and the functional basis of the symptoms observed following ischemic lesions in different parts of the human thalamus.


1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. 2462-2475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Eifuku ◽  
Robert H. Wurtz

Many neurons in the lateral-ventral region of the medial superior temporal area (MSTl) have a clear center surround separation in their receptive fields. Either moving or stationary stimuli in the surround modulates the response to moving stimuli in the center, and this modulation could facilitate the perceptual segmentation of a moving object from its background. Another mechanism that could facilitate such segmentation would be sensitivity to binocular disparity in the center and surround regions of the receptive fields of these neurons. We therefore investigated the sensitivity of these MSTl neurons to disparity ranging from three degrees crossed disparity (near) to three degrees uncrossed disparity (far) applied to both the center and the surround regions. Many neurons showed clear disparity sensitivity to stimulus motion in the center of the receptive field. About [Formula: see text] of 104 neurons had a clear peak in their response, whereas another [Formula: see text] had broader tuning. Monocular stimulation abolished the tuning. The prevalence of cells broadly tuned to near and far disparity and the reversal of preferred directions at different disparities observed in MSTd were not found in MSTl. A stationary surround at zero disparity simply modulated up or down the response to moving stimuli at different disparities in the receptive field (RF) center but did not alter the disparity tuning curve. When the RF center motion was held at zero disparity and the disparity of the stationary surround was varied, some surround disparities produced greater modulation of MSTl neuron response than did others. Some neurons with different disparity preferences in center and surround responded best to the relative disparity differences between center and surround, whereas others were related to the absolute difference between center and surround. The combination of modulatory surrounds and the sensitivity to relative difference between center and surround disparity make these MSTl neurons particularly well suited for the segmentation of a moving object from the background.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document