scholarly journals PGI9 THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF INTRAVENOUS PROTON PUMP INHIBITOR CONTINUOUS INFUSION (IV PPI) ADMINISTERED PRIOR TO ENDOSCOPY IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH NON-VARICEAL UPPER GI BLEEDING

2002 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 253 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Barkun ◽  
K Herba ◽  
WA Kennedy ◽  
CA Fallone ◽  
A RUGBE Investigators
2019 ◽  
pp. 174749301987965
Author(s):  
Ramon Luengo-Fernandez ◽  
Linxin Li ◽  
Peter M Rothwell ◽  

Background Long-term antiplatelet treatment is associated with major bleeding. Aims To determine the costs associated with major bleeding in patients treated with aspirin-based antiplatelet treatment for secondary prevention of vascular events without routine prescription of proton-pump inhibitors and to estimate the likely long-term savings from routine co-prescription. Methods In a prospective population-based cohort study of TIA, ischemic stroke, and MI treated with antiplatelet drugs, we evaluated hospital care costs associated with bleed management during 10-year follow-up. Bleeding-associated costs were averaged across all patients. For upper GI-bleeds, mean costs were compared with the cost of routine co-prescription of proton-pump inhibitor. Results Among 3166 patients on antiplatelet therapy with 405 first bleeding events, the average cost of major bleeding was $13,093 (S.D. 20,501), with similar costs for upper GI bleeds and intracranial bleeds ( p = 0.235). However, total costs among the 3166 patients were higher for upper GI bleeds ($1,158,385 vs. $740,123). Averaged across all patients, the 10-year cost of major bleeding was $838 (95%CI: 680–1007), $411 due to upper GI bleeding, the cost of which increased from $175 in those aged <75 years to $644 at age ≥75 years ( p < 0.0001). The corresponding costs of routine life-long co-prescription of proton-pump inhibitor to those patients not on prior treatment were $85 (84–88) and $39 (38–42). Conclusions In secondary prevention with aspirin-based antiplatelet treatment without routine proton-pump inhibitor use, the long-term costs of upper-GI bleeding at age ≥75 years are much higher than at younger age groups, and are at least 10-fold greater than the drug cost of routine co-prescription of proton-pump inhibitor.


2005 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. AB156
Author(s):  
Brennan Spiegel ◽  
Brian Lim ◽  
Gareth S. Dulai ◽  
Neel Mann ◽  
Fasiha Kanwal ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 489-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan N Barkun ◽  
Ralph Crott ◽  
Carlo A Fallone ◽  
Wendy A Kennedy ◽  
Jean Lachaine ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: The cost-effectiveness of initial strategies in managing Canadian patients with uninvestigated upper gastrointestinal symptoms remains controversial.OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of six management approaches to uninvestigated upper gastrointestinal symptoms in the Canadian setting.METHODS: The present study analyzed data from four randomized trials assessing homogeneous and complementary populations of Canadian patients with uninvestigated upper gastrointestinal symptoms with comparable outcomes. Symptom-free months, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and direct costs in Canadian dollars of two management approaches based on the Canadian Dyspepsia Working Group (CanDys) Clinical Management Tool, and four additional strategies (two empirical antisecretory agents, and two prompt endoscopy) were examined and compared. Prevalence data, probabilities, utilities and costs were included in a Markov model, while sensitivity analysis used Monte Carlo simulations. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were determined.RESULTS: Empirical omeprazole cost $226 per QALY ($49 per symptom-free month) per patient. CanDys omeprazole and endoscopy approaches were more effective than empirical omeprazole, but more costly. Alternatives using H2-receptor antagonists were less effective than those using a proton pump inhibitor. No significant differences were found for most incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. As willingness to pay (WTP) thresholds rose from $226 to $24,000 per QALY, empirical antisecretory approaches were less likely to be the most cost-effective choice, with CanDys omeprazole progressively becoming a more likely option. For WTP values ranging from $24,000 to $70,000 per QALY, the most clinically relevant range, CanDys omeprazole was the most cost-effective strategy (32% to 46% of the time), with prompt endoscopy-proton pump inhibitor favoured at higher WTP values.CONCLUSIONS: Although no strategy was the indisputable cost-effective option, CanDys omeprazole may be the strategy of choice over a clinically relevant range of WTP assumptions in the initial management of Canadian patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia.


2001 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. A83
Author(s):  
A. Pilotto ◽  
M. Franceschi ◽  
G. Leandro ◽  
R. De Candia ◽  
G. Valerio ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-252
Author(s):  
K Herba ◽  
A Barkun ◽  
WA Kennedy ◽  
CA Fallone ◽  
A RUGBE Investigators

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document