PTMS5 How sleep and sleep deprivation modulate juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: a combined EEG TMS study

2011 ◽  
Vol 122 ◽  
pp. S182
Author(s):  
A. Del Felice ◽  
L. Bongiovanni ◽  
S. Savazzi ◽  
S. Mele ◽  
A. Fiaschi ◽  
...  
2005 ◽  
Vol 63 (2b) ◽  
pp. 383-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nise Alessandra de Carvalho Sousa ◽  
Patrícia da Silva Sousa ◽  
Eliana Garzon ◽  
Américo C. Sakamoto ◽  
Nádia I.O. Braga ◽  
...  

Seizures in Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy (JME) are dependent on the sleep-wake cycle and precipitant factors, among which sleep deprivation (SD) is one of the most important. Still an under diagnosed syndrome, misinterpretation of the EEGs contributes to diagnostic delay. Despite this, a quantitative EEG investigation of SD effects has not been performed. We investigated the effect of SD on EEGs in 41 patients, aged 16-50 yr. (mean 25.4), who had not yet had syndromic diagnosis after a mean delay of 8.2 yr. Two EEG recordings separated by a 48-hour interval were taken at 7 a.m. preceded by a period of 6 hours of sleep (routine EEG) and after SD (sleep-deprived EEG). The same protocol was followed and included a rest wakefulness recording, photic stimulation, hyperventilation and a post-hyperventilation period. The EEGs were analyzed as to the effect of SD on the number, duration, morphology, localization and predominance of abnormalities in the different stages. A discharge index (DI) was calculated. Out of the 41 patients, 4 presented both normal EEG recordings. In 37 (90.2%) there were epileptiform discharges (ED). The number of patients with ED ascended from 26 (70.3%) in the routine EEG to 32 (86.5%) in the sleep-deprived exam. The presence of generalized spike-wave and multispike-wave increased from 20 (54.1%) and 13 (35.1%) in the first EEG to 29 (78.4%) and 19 (51.4%) in the second, respectively (p<0.05 and p<0.01). As to localization, the number of generalized, bilateral and synchronous ED increased from 21 (56.8%) to 30 (81.1%) (p<0.01). The DI also increased; while 8 patients (21.6%) presented greater rate in the routine EEG, 25 (67.6%) did so in the sleep-deprived EEG mainly during somnolence and sleep (p<0.01). Moreover, the paroxysms were also longer in the sleep-deprived EEG. Sleep-deprived EEG is a powerful tool in JME and can contribute significantly to the syndromic characterization of this syndrome.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerhard Kurlemann ◽  
Jana Krois-Neudenberger ◽  
Oliver Schwartz ◽  
Beate Jensen ◽  
Jürgen Althaus ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 36 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Plattner ◽  
J Kindler ◽  
G Pahs ◽  
L Urak ◽  
H Mayer ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Bengi Gul Turk ◽  
Naz Yeni ◽  
Aysegul Gunduz ◽  
Ceren Alis ◽  
Meral Kiziltan

2021 ◽  
pp. 088307382110195
Author(s):  
Sabrina Pan ◽  
Alan Wu ◽  
Mark Weiner ◽  
Zachary M Grinspan

Introduction: Computable phenotypes allow identification of well-defined patient cohorts from electronic health record data. Little is known about the accuracy of diagnostic codes for important clinical concepts in pediatric epilepsy, such as (1) risk factors like neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy; (2) clinical concepts like treatment resistance; (3) and syndromes like juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. We developed and evaluated the performance of computable phenotypes for these examples using electronic health record data at one center. Methods: We identified gold standard cohorts for neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, pediatric treatment-resistant epilepsy, and juvenile myoclonic epilepsy via existing registries and review of clinical notes. From the electronic health record, we extracted diagnostic and procedure codes for all children with a diagnosis of epilepsy and seizures. We used these codes to develop computable phenotypes and evaluated by sensitivity, positive predictive value, and the F-measure. Results: For neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, the best-performing computable phenotype (HIE ICD-9 /10 and [brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or electroencephalography (EEG) within 120 days of life] and absence of commonly miscoded conditions) had high sensitivity (95.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 85-99), positive predictive value (100%, 95% CI 95-100), and F measure (0.98). For treatment-resistant epilepsy, the best-performing computable phenotype (3 or more antiseizure medicines in the last 2 years or treatment-resistant ICD-10) had a sensitivity of 86.9% (95% CI 79-93), positive predictive value of 69.6% (95% CI 60-79), and F-measure of 0.77. For juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, the best performing computable phenotype (JME ICD-10) had poor sensitivity (52%, 95% CI 43-60) but high positive predictive value (90.4%, 95% CI 81-96); the F measure was 0.66. Conclusion: The variable accuracy of our computable phenotypes (hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy high, treatment resistance medium, and juvenile myoclonic epilepsy low) demonstrates the heterogeneity of success using administrative data to identify cohorts important for pediatric epilepsy research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document