113. En bloc resection for primary bone tumors of the spine

2003 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 122
Author(s):  
Charles Fisher ◽  
Marcel Dvorak ◽  
Michael Boyd
2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauricio J. Avila ◽  
Jesse Skoch ◽  
Vernard S. Fennell ◽  
Sheri K. Palejwala ◽  
Christina M. Walter ◽  
...  

Primary bone tumors of the spine are rare entities with a poor prognosis if left untreated. En bloc excision is the preferred surgical approach to minimize the rate of recurrence. Paraspinal primary bone tumors are even less common. In this technical note the authors present an approach to the en bloc resection of primary bone tumors of the paraspinal thoracic region with posterior vertebral body hemiosteotomies and lateral thoracotomy. They also describe 2 illustrative cases.


2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 98-105
Author(s):  
Raphaële Charest-Morin ◽  
Alana M. Flexman ◽  
Shreya Srinivas ◽  
Charles G. Fisher ◽  
John T. Street ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVESurgical treatment of primary bone tumors of the spine and en bloc resection for isolated metastases are complex and challenging. Operative care is fraught with complications, though the true incidence and predictors of adverse events (AEs), length of stay (LOS), and mortality in this population remain poorly understood. The primary objective of this study was to describe the incidence and predictors of perioperative AEs in these patients. Secondary objectives included the determination of the incidence and predictors of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), unanticipated reoperation during the same admission, hospital LOS, and mortality.METHODSIn this retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data, the authors included consecutive patients at a single quaternary care referral center (January 1, 2009, to September 30, 2018) who underwent either surgery for a primary bone tumor of the spine or an en bloc resection for an isolated spinal metastasis. Information on perioperative AEs, demographic data, primary tumor histology, neurological status, surgical variables, pathological margins, Enneking appropriateness, LOS, ICU stay, reoperation during the same admission period, and in-hospital mortality was collected prospectively in the institutional database. The modified frailty score was extracted retrospectively.RESULTSOne hundred thirteen patients met the inclusion criteria: 98 with primary bone tumors and 15 with isolated metastases. The cohort was 59% male, and the mean age was 49 years (SD 19 years). Overall, 79% of the patients experienced at least 1 AE. The median number of AEs per patient was 2 (IQR 0–4 AEs), and the median LOS was 16 days (IQR 9–32 days). No in-hospital deaths occurred in the cohort. Thirty-two patients (28%) required an ICU stay and 19% underwent an unanticipated second surgery during their admission. A longer surgical duration was associated with a higher likelihood of AEs (OR 1.21/hour, 95% CI 1.06–1.37, p = 0.005), longer ICU stay (OR 1.35/hour, 95% CI 1 1.20–1.52, p < 0.001), and reoperation (OR 1.001/hour, 95% CI 1.0003–1.003, p = 0.012). Longer hospital LOS was independently predicted by older age, female sex, upper cervical and sacral location of the tumor, surgical duration, preoperative neurological deficit, presence of AEs, and higher modified frailty index score.CONCLUSIONSSurgeries for primary bone tumors and en bloc resection for metastatic tumors are associated with a high incidence of perioperative AEs. Surgical duration predicts complications, reoperation, LOS, and ICU stay.


Foot & Ankle ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 223-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas P. Burns ◽  
Mark Weiss ◽  
Mark Snyder ◽  
Clark N. Hopson

The following is a report of a giant cell tumor of a metatarsal, description of treatment, and review of the literature. Giant cell tumors comprise approximately 5–8% of the primary bone tumors. Metatarsal bones are a very rare primary site of involvement. Clinically aggressive or benign behavior cannot be predicted histologically. Treatment should be aggressive, as in this case where en bloc resection and bone graft were performed. Results were excellent with 4 yr follow-up.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 1120-1126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Xu ◽  
Kai Zheng ◽  
Jie Zhao ◽  
Wen‐zhe Bai ◽  
Xiu‐chun Yu

Spine Surgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 513-522
Author(s):  
Dominique A. Rothenfluh ◽  
Etienne Bourassa-Moreau

2018 ◽  
Vol 476 (3) ◽  
pp. 511-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Germán L. Farfalli ◽  
Jose I. Albergo ◽  
Nicolas S. Piuzzi ◽  
Miguel A. Ayerza ◽  
D. Luis Muscolo ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weijian Liu ◽  
Baichuan Wang ◽  
Shuo Zhang ◽  
Yubin Li ◽  
Binwu Hu ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. E4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Galgano ◽  
Carlos R. Goulart ◽  
Hans Iwenofu ◽  
Lawrence S. Chin ◽  
William Lavelle ◽  
...  

Osteoblastomas are primary bone tumors with an affinity for the spine. They typically involve the posterior elements, although extension through the pedicles into the vertebral body is not uncommon. Histologically, they are usually indistinguishable from osteoid osteomas. However, there are different variants of osteoblastomas, with the more aggressive type causing more pronounced bone destruction, soft-tissue infiltration, and epidural extension. A bone scan is the most sensitive radiographic examination used to evaluate osteoblastomas. These osseous neoplasms usually present in the 2nd decade of life with dull aching pain, which is difficult to localize. At times, they can present with a painful scoliosis, which usually resolves if the osteoblastoma is resected in a timely fashion. Neurological manifestations such as radiculopathy or myelopathy do occur as well, most commonly when there is mass effect on nerve roots or the spinal cord itself. The mainstay of treatment involves surgical intervention. Curettage has been a surgical option, although marginal excision or wide en bloc resection are preferred options. Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy are generally not undertaken, although some have advocated their use after less aggressive surgical maneuvers or with residual tumor. In this manuscript, the authors have aimed to systematically review the literature and to put forth an extensive, comprehensive overview of this rare osseous tumor.


2003 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Bohinski ◽  
Laurence D. Rhines

Oncological principles for en bloc resection of bone tumors were initially developed for tumors of the long bone by orthopedic surgical oncologists. Recently, spine surgeons have adopted these principles for the treatment of vertebral column tumors. The goal of en bloc resection is to establish a surgical margin that can be designated marginal or wide. In this article, the principles of surgical oncology for bone tumors of the spine are briefly reviewed and the different surgical approaches used to remove these tumors in an en bloc fashion are described in detail.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document