P086 Post-radical prostatectomy incontinence: Patient perceived outcomes after the advance male sling procedure

2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 219
Author(s):  
E. Rijo ◽  
O. Bielsa ◽  
J.A. Lorente ◽  
A. Ubre ◽  
A. Frances ◽  
...  
Urology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 ◽  
pp. 257-262
Author(s):  
Danilo Souza Lima da Costa Cruz ◽  
Carlos Arturo Levi D´Ancona ◽  
Walter Pinto da Silva Filho ◽  
Maria Cristina Dornas ◽  
Jamal Baracat ◽  
...  

Urology ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 86-87
Author(s):  
A. Hidoussi ◽  
M. Jaidane ◽  
A. Slama ◽  
A. Youssef ◽  
Y. Kalel ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (24) ◽  
pp. 5842
Author(s):  
Emily M. Yura ◽  
Christopher J. Staniorski ◽  
Jason E. Cohen ◽  
Liqi Chen ◽  
Ashima Singal ◽  
...  

Background: Recurrent stress urinary incontinence (SUI) following male sling can be managed surgically with artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) insertion. Prior small, single-center retrospective studies have not demonstrated an association between having failed a sling procedure and worse AUS outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of primary AUS placement in men who had or had not undergone a previous sling procedure. Methods: A retrospective review of all AUS devices implanted at a single academic center during 2000–2018 was performed. After excluding secondary AUS placements, revision and explant procedures, 135 patients were included in this study, of which 19 (14.1%) patients had undergone prior sling procedures. Results: There was no significant difference in demographic characteristics between patients undergoing AUS placement with or without a prior sling procedure. Average follow up time was 28.0 months. Prior sling was associated with shorter overall device survival, with an increased likelihood of requiring revision or replacement of the device (OR 4.2 (1.3–13.2), p = 0.015) as well as reoperation for any reason (OR 3.5 (1.2–9.9), p = 0.019). While not statistically significant, patients with a prior sling were more likely to note persistent incontinence at most recent follow up (68.8% vs. 42.7%, p = 0.10). Conclusions: Having undergone a prior sling procedure is associated with shorter device survival and need for revision or replacement surgery. When considering patients for sling procedures, patients should be counseled regarding the potential for worse AUS outcomes should they require additional anti-incontinence procedures following a failed sling.


2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Wallis ◽  
Sender Herschorn ◽  
Ying Liu ◽  
Lesley Carr ◽  
Ronald T Kodama ◽  
...  

Introduction: We assess the practice patterns of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) and urethral sling insertion after radical prostatectomy (RP) from a large population-based cohort.Methods: We examined 25 346 men in Ontario, Canada who underwent RP between 1993 and 2006. Using hospital and cancer registry data, we identified patients who subsequently underwent an incontinence procedure. We characterized the practice patterns of post-prostatectomy incontinence procedures across Ontario during the study interval.Results: A total of 703 (2.8%) men underwent subsequent insertion of an AUS and 282 (1.1%) underwent a urethral sling procedure (985 total incontinence procedures, 3.9%) over the study period. During the study period, 121 hospitals performed RP. Among them, 32 (26%) hospitals performed both RP and AUS/sling procedures, and 89 (74%) performed RP only. Four hospitals performed AUS/sling procedures but not RP. Of the 36 institutions that performed AUS/sling procedures, the median annual case volume was 0.29 (interquartile range: 0.083-0.75). Of all incontinence procedures, 56% were performed at 3 academic institutions. When examining observed rates of AUS/sling procedures compared with expected rates from the overall cohort, 15 of 32 hospitals (47%) performed significantly fewer incontinence procedures than expected given their RP case volume (p range: <0.0001–0.0390) and 5 (16%) performed significantly more (p range: <0.0001–0.038).Conclusions: A small number of academic institutions provide most of the surgical care for men with incontinence following RP in Ontario. Many centres that perform RP refer out to other centres to surgically manage their patients’ incontinence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document