Single Room Maternity Care: Perinatal Outcomes, Economic Costs, and Physician Preferences

2004 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 633-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan J. Harris ◽  
Malcolm D. Farren ◽  
Patricia A. Janssen ◽  
Michael C. Klein ◽  
Shoo K. Lee
Nursing Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 1661-1670
Author(s):  
Elena Ali ◽  
Jill M. Norris ◽  
Marc Hall ◽  
Deborah E. White

2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 286-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Oros ◽  
Raquel Garcia-Simon ◽  
Jesús Clemente ◽  
Ernesto Fabre ◽  
Manuel Angel Romero ◽  
...  

Birth ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 173-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia A. Janssen ◽  
Susan J. Harris ◽  
Jetty Soolsma ◽  
Michael C. Klein ◽  
Laurie C. Seymour
Keyword(s):  

Birth ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 235-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia A Janssen ◽  
Michael C Klein ◽  
Susan J Harris ◽  
Jetty Soolsma ◽  
Laurie C Seymour

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karline Wilson-Mitchell ◽  
Lucia Eustace ◽  
Jamie Robinson ◽  
Aloisia Shemdoe ◽  
Stephano Simba

Respectful maternity care research in Tanzania continues to increase. This is an overview of the literature summarizing research based on the domains which comprise this quality of care indicator, ranging from exploratory and descriptive to quantitative measurements of birth perinatal outcomes when respectful interventions are made. The domains of respectful care are reflected in the seven Universal Rights of Childbearing Women but go further to implicate facility administrators and policy makers to provide supportive infrastructure to allay disrespect and abuse. The research methodologies continue to be problematic and several ethical cautions restrict how much control is possible. Similarly, the barriers to collecting accurate accounts in qualitative studies of disrespect require astute interviewing and observation techniques. The participatory community-based and the critical sociology and human rights frameworks appear to provide a good basis for both researcher and participants to identify problems and determine possible solutions to the multiple factors that contribute to disrespect and abuse. The work-life conditions of midwives in the Global South are plagued with poor infrastructure and significantly low resources which deters respectful care while decreasing retention of workers. Researchers and policy-makers have addressed disrespectful care by building human resource capacity, by strengthening professional organizations and by educating midwives in low-resource countries. Furthermore, researchers encourage midwives not only to acquire attitudinal change and to adopt respectful maternity care skills, but also to emerge as leaders and change agents. Safe methods for conducting care while addressing low resources, skilled management of conflict and creative innovations to engage the community are all interventions that are being considered for quality improvement research. Tanzania is poised to evaluate the outcomes of education workshops that address all seven domains of respectful care.


2005 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia A Janssen ◽  
Lois Keen ◽  
Jetty Soolsma ◽  
Laurie C Seymour ◽  
Susan J Harris ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Embla Ýr Guðmundsdóttir ◽  
Helga Gottfreðsdóttir ◽  
Berglind Hálfdánsdóttir ◽  
Marianne Nieuwenhuijze ◽  
Mika Gissler ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pien Offerhaus ◽  
Suze Jans ◽  
Chantal Hukkelhoven ◽  
Raymond de Vries ◽  
Marianne Nieuwenhuijze

Abstract Background The maternity care system in the Netherlands is well known for its support of community-based midwifery. However, regular midwifery practices typically do not offer caseload midwifery care – one-to-one continuity of care throughout pregnancy and birth. Because we know very little about the outcomes for women receiving caseload care in the Netherlands, we compared caseload care with regular midwife-led care, looking at maternal and perinatal outcomes, including antenatal and intrapartum referrals to secondary (i.e., obstetrician-led) care. Methods We selected 657 women in caseload care and 1954 matched controls (women in regular midwife-led care) from all women registered in the Dutch Perinatal Registry (Perined) who gave birth in 2015. To be eligible for selection the women had to be in midwife-led antenatal care beyond 28 gestational weeks. Each woman in caseload care was matched with three women in regular midwife-led care, using parity, maternal age, background (Dutch or non-Dutch) and region. These two cohorts were compared for referral rates, mode of birth, and other maternal and perinatal outcomes. Results In caseload midwifery care, 46.9% of women were referred to obstetrician-led care (24.2% antenatally and 22.8% in the intrapartum period). In the matched cohort, 65.7% were referred (37.4% antenatally and 28.3% in the intrapartum period). In caseload care, 84.0% experienced a spontaneous vaginal birth versus 77.0% in regular midwife-led care. These patterns were observed for both nulliparous and multiparous women. Women in caseload care had fewer inductions of labour (13.2% vs 21.0%), more homebirths (39.4% vs 16.1%) and less perineal damage (intact perineum: 41.3% vs 28.2%). The incidence of perinatal mortality and a low Apgar score was low in both groups. Conclusions We found that when compared to regular midwife-led care, caseload midwifery care in the Netherlands is associated with a lower referral rate to obstetrician-led care – both antenatally and in the intrapartum period – and a higher spontaneous vaginal birth rate, with similar perinatal safety. The challenge is to include this model as part of the current effort to improve the quality of Dutch maternity care, making caseload care available and affordable for more women.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document