scholarly journals Women’s characteristics and care outcomes of caseload midwifery care in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pien Offerhaus ◽  
Suze Jans ◽  
Chantal Hukkelhoven ◽  
Raymond de Vries ◽  
Marianne Nieuwenhuijze

Abstract Background The maternity care system in the Netherlands is well known for its support of community-based midwifery. However, regular midwifery practices typically do not offer caseload midwifery care – one-to-one continuity of care throughout pregnancy and birth. Because we know very little about the outcomes for women receiving caseload care in the Netherlands, we compared caseload care with regular midwife-led care, looking at maternal and perinatal outcomes, including antenatal and intrapartum referrals to secondary (i.e., obstetrician-led) care. Methods We selected 657 women in caseload care and 1954 matched controls (women in regular midwife-led care) from all women registered in the Dutch Perinatal Registry (Perined) who gave birth in 2015. To be eligible for selection the women had to be in midwife-led antenatal care beyond 28 gestational weeks. Each woman in caseload care was matched with three women in regular midwife-led care, using parity, maternal age, background (Dutch or non-Dutch) and region. These two cohorts were compared for referral rates, mode of birth, and other maternal and perinatal outcomes. Results In caseload midwifery care, 46.9% of women were referred to obstetrician-led care (24.2% antenatally and 22.8% in the intrapartum period). In the matched cohort, 65.7% were referred (37.4% antenatally and 28.3% in the intrapartum period). In caseload care, 84.0% experienced a spontaneous vaginal birth versus 77.0% in regular midwife-led care. These patterns were observed for both nulliparous and multiparous women. Women in caseload care had fewer inductions of labour (13.2% vs 21.0%), more homebirths (39.4% vs 16.1%) and less perineal damage (intact perineum: 41.3% vs 28.2%). The incidence of perinatal mortality and a low Apgar score was low in both groups. Conclusions We found that when compared to regular midwife-led care, caseload midwifery care in the Netherlands is associated with a lower referral rate to obstetrician-led care – both antenatally and in the intrapartum period – and a higher spontaneous vaginal birth rate, with similar perinatal safety. The challenge is to include this model as part of the current effort to improve the quality of Dutch maternity care, making caseload care available and affordable for more women.

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-113
Author(s):  
Simona Fumagalli ◽  
Elisabetta Colciago ◽  
Laura Antolini ◽  
Sofia Perego ◽  
Micaela Fiorasi ◽  
...  

Background Evidence on the safety and appropriateness of vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) appears clear, but knowledge about women's choice towards this mode of birth is limited. Aims To identify variables related to women's decision-making about whether to try for VBAC. Method and findings Cross-sectional study was conducted. Feelings of body failure towards the previous birth and the desire to have a vaginal birth were associated with maternal choice of VBAC. Women who perceived a repeated section as being dangerous for them opted for a VBAC (p=0.030). Opinion of women with the same experience and information found online were implicated into maternal decision-making. Conclusion This is the first Italian study to confirm that maternal choice is complex and involves many factors. Midwives and obstetricians should strive to provide an evidence-based midwifery care, in order to offer a VBAC as a safe birth option.


The Lancet ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 382 (9906) ◽  
pp. 1723-1732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sally K Tracy ◽  
Donna L Hartz ◽  
Mark B Tracy ◽  
Jyai Allen ◽  
Amanda Forti ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrienne Priday ◽  
Deborah Payne ◽  
Marion Hunter

Background: Early engagement with a maternity carer is recommended as a means of reducing stillbirth and neonatal mortality. This is especially important for women who live in high deprivation areas, as these areas have been associated with late access to maternity/midwifery care and significantly higher rates of stillbirth and neonatal mortality. Co-locating midwives at general practitioner (GP) clinics in such an area was established with the aim of facilitating women’s early access to midwifery care. Aim: To explore the experience of multiparous women who live in socio-economically deprived communities within the Counties Manukau Health region and who accessed the services of midwives at co-located clinics. Method: Interpretive descriptive methodology was used to explore the experiences of each woman before and after using a co-located midwifery clinic. One-to-one, semi-structured interviews were undertaken and data examined using thematic analysis. Findings: The eight women interviewed found accessing Lead Maternity Care (LMC) midwives during early pregnancy a daunting journey before being able to use a co-located clinic in the Counties Manukau Health region. Barriers identified were: a lack of knowledge about how to find a LMC midwife, limited finance and limited time. These impacted on women’s ability and confidence to find a suitable LMC midwife. The women expressed the need for help to circumvent the maternity care maze through receiving a recommendation for a LMC midwife and having access to a midwife co-located at their GP clinic. Conclusions: The participants encountered numerous barriers accessing early LMC midwifery care. Enablers to accessing early LMC midwifery care include receiving recommendations from GP clinic personnel, and midwives being co-located at GP clinics to make maternity care convenient and with a smooth transition from GP to LMC midwife care.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Janneke T. Gitsels-van der Wal ◽  
Lisanne A. Gitsels ◽  
Angelo Hooker ◽  
Paula Scholing ◽  
Linda Martin ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 234-235
Author(s):  
S.K. Tracy ◽  
D.L. Hartz ◽  
M.B. Tracy ◽  
J. Allen ◽  
A. Forti ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 811-818
Author(s):  
Nicole B. Kurata ◽  
Keith K. Ogasawara ◽  
Kathryn L. Pedula ◽  
William A. Goh

AbstractObjectivesShort interpregnancy intervals (IPI) have been linked to multiple adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, but less is known about prolonged IPI, including its relationship with labor progression. The objective of the study was to investigate whether prolonged IPIs are associated with longer second stages of labor.MethodsA perinatal database from Kaiser Permanente Hawaii was used to identify 442 women with a prolonged IPI ≥60 months. Four hundred forty two nulliparous and 442 multiparous women with an IPI 18–59 months were selected as comparison groups. The primary outcome was second stage of labor duration. Perinatal outcomes were compared between these groups.ResultsThe median (IQR) second stage of labor duration was 76 (38–141) min in nulliparous women, 15 (9–28) min in multiparous women, and 18 (10–38) min in women with a prolonged IPI (p<0.0001). Pairwise comparisons revealed significantly different second stage duration in the nulliparous group compared to both the multiparous and prolonged IPI groups, but no difference between the multiparous and prolonged IPI groups. There was a significant association with the length of the IPI; median duration 30 (12–61) min for IPI ≥120 months vs. 15 (9–27) min for IPI 18–59 months and 16 (9–31) min for IPI 60–119 months (p=0.0014).ConclusionsThe second stage of labor did not differ in women with a prolonged IPI compared to normal multiparous women. Women with an IPI ≥120 months had a significantly longer second stage vs. those with a shorter IPI. These findings provide a better understanding of labor progression in pregnancies with a prolonged IPI.


2015 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Athanasios F. Kallianidis ◽  
Marrit Smit ◽  
Jos Van Roosmalen

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. e0180846 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ank de Jonge ◽  
Lilian Peters ◽  
Caroline C. Geerts ◽  
Jos J. M. van Roosmalen ◽  
Jos W. R. Twisk ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 633-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan J. Harris ◽  
Malcolm D. Farren ◽  
Patricia A. Janssen ◽  
Michael C. Klein ◽  
Shoo K. Lee

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document