Data Fail to Back Rapid Response Teams

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 8-9
Author(s):  
MARY ANN MOON
2017 ◽  
Vol 188 ◽  
pp. 258-262.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
James J. Fehr ◽  
Mary E. McBride ◽  
John R. Boulet ◽  
David J. Murray

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 198-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Searle Leach ◽  
Ann M. Mayo

Background Multidisciplinary rapid response teams focus on patients’ emergent needs and manage critical situations to prevent avoidable deaths. Although research has focused primarily on outcomes, studies of the actual team effectiveness within the teams from multiple perspectives have been limited. Objective To describe effectiveness of rapid response teams in a large teaching hospital in California that had been using such teams for 5 years. Methods The grounded-theory method was used to discover if substantive theory might emerge from interview and/or observational data. Purposeful sampling was used to conduct in-person semistructured interviews with 17 key informants. Convenience sampling was used for the 9 observed events that involved a rapid response team. Analysis involved use of a concept or indicator model to generate empirical results from the data. Data were coded, compared, and contrasted, and, when appropriate, relationships between concepts were formed. Results Dimensions of effective team performance included the concepts of organizational culture, team structure, expertise, communication, and teamwork. Conclusions Professionals involved reported that rapid response teams functioned well in managing patients at risk or in crisis; however, unique challenges were identified. Teams were loosely coupled because of the inconsistency of team members from day to day. Team members had little opportunity to develop relationships or team skills. The need for team training may be greater than that among teams that work together regularly under less time pressure to perform. Communication between team members and managing a crisis were critical aspects of an effective response team.


2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine M. Groth ◽  
Nicole M. Acquisto

Purpose: Rapid response teams (RRTs) have been developed to provide early therapy to patients with risk factors for cardiopulmonary arrest. We sought to investigate the role a pharmacist could have as a member of the RRT. Methods: Two pharmacists trained in critical care and emergency medicine proposed a pilot program to determine whether a pharmacist as a member of the RRT could help to optimize pharmacotherapy and facilitate medication administration. During response, 1 pharmacist was at the bedside with the RRT for patient evaluation, consult, chart review, and to facilitate medication administration. The responding RRT pharmacist collected patient demographics, medications administered, pharmacotherapy recommendations, and time commitment. Results: The pharmacists responded to 32 RRT alerts. A majority (65.6%) of patients required at least 1 medication, and a total of 45 medications were administered. The pharmacists performed 49 pharmacotherapy-related interventions in 21 patients. These included medication facilitation (15), dose (15) or therapy (8) recommendations, and adding (6) or discontinuing (5) a medication. The pharmacists spent a median time of 15 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 15, range 2-70) for each RRT alert and a total of 612 minutes (10.2 hours). Conclusion: With a minimal time commitment, pharmacists can be valuable members of the RRT.


2009 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 176-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Donaldson ◽  
Susan Shapiro ◽  
Mary Scott ◽  
Mary Foley ◽  
Joanne Spetz

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 18-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. Ward

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly Scherr ◽  
Donna M. Wilson ◽  
Joan Wagner ◽  
Maureen Haughian

Evidence is needed to validate rapid response teams (RRTs), including those led by nurse practitioners (NPs). A descriptive-comparative mixed-methods study was undertaken to evaluate a newly implemented NP-led RRT at 2 Canadian hospitals. On the basis of data gathered on 255 patients who received an RRT call compared with the patient data for the previous year, no significant differences in the number of cardiorespiratory arrests, unplanned intensive care unit admissions, and hospital mortality were found. In addition, no significant differences in patient outcomes were identified between the NP-led and intensivist physician-led RRT calls. A paper survey revealed that ward nurses had confidence in the knowledge and skills of the NP-led RRT and believed that patient outcomes were improved as a result of their RRT call. These findings indicate that NP-led RRTs are a safe and effective alternative to intensivist-led teams, but more research is needed to demonstrate that RRTs improve hospital care quality and patient outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document