scholarly journals Adjacent Segment Disease in a Patient With Klippel-Feil Syndrome and Radiculopathy: Surgical Treatment With Two-Level Disc Replacement

2007 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 131-134
Author(s):  
Alejandro Reyes-Sánchez ◽  
Barón Zárate-Kalfópulos ◽  
Luis Miguel Rosales-Olivares
SAS Journal ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 131-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandro Reyes-Sánchez ◽  
Barón Zárate-Kalfópulos ◽  
Luis Miguel Rosales-Olivares

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. S63
Author(s):  
Ajay Jawahar ◽  
Pierce D. Nunley ◽  
David A. Cavanaugh ◽  
Charles R. Gordon ◽  
Eubulus J. Kerr ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 100-B (8) ◽  
pp. 991-1001 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Findlay ◽  
S. Ayis ◽  
A. K. Demetriades

Aims The aim of this study was to determine how the short- and medium- to long-term outcome measures after total disc replacement (TDR) compare with those of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), using a systematic review and meta-analysis. Patients and Methods Databases including Medline, Embase, and Scopus were searched. Inclusion criteria involved prospective randomized control trials (RCTs) reporting the surgical treatment of patients with symptomatic degenerative cervical disc disease. Two independent investigators extracted the data. The strength of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. The primary outcome measures were overall and neurological success, and these were included in the meta-analysis. Standardized patient-reported outcomes, including the incidence of further surgery and adjacent segment disease, were summarized and discussed. Results A total of 22 papers published from 14 RCTs were included, representing 3160 patients with follow-up of up to ten years. Meta-analysis indicated that TDR is superior to ACDF at two years and between four and seven years. In the short-term, patients who underwent TDR had better patient-reported outcomes than those who underwent ACDF, but at two years this was typically not significant. Results between four and seven years showed significant differences in Neck Disability Index (NDI), 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) physical component scores, dysphagia, and satisfaction, all favouring TDR. Most trials found significantly less adjacent segment disease after TDR at both two years (short-term) and between four and seven years (medium- to long-term). Conclusion TDR is as effective as ACDF and superior for some outcomes. Disc replacement reduces the risk of adjacent segment disease. Continued uncertainty remains about degeneration of the prosthesis. Long-term surveillance of patients who undergo TDR may allow its routine use. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:991–1001.


2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 45S
Author(s):  
Paul McAfee ◽  
Luiz Pimenta ◽  
Matthew Scott-Young ◽  
Andrew Cappuccino

2020 ◽  
pp. 219256822093581
Author(s):  
Joep Kitzen ◽  
Timon F. G. Vercoulen ◽  
Martijn G. M. Schotanus ◽  
Sander M. J. van Kuijk ◽  
Nanne P. Kort ◽  
...  

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objectives: Total disc replacement (TDR) has been introduced in order to preserve segmental motion and thus reduce adjacent segment disease (ASD) as seen after spinal fusion. However, it is uncertain whether these presumed beneficial effects remain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term incidence of ASD and residual-mobility in relation to clinical outcome. Methods: A total of 210 patients treated with lumbar TDR for degenerative disc disease were invited for follow-up. ASD was reported in case of severe degeneration in an adjacent disc at latest follow-up, or if an increase in disc degeneration was observed in these adjacent segments as compared to direct postoperative radiographs. Residual-mobility of the TDR was defined as a minimal rotation of 4.6° on flexion-extension radiographs. Patient-reported outcome measures were obtained. Results: Fifty-seven patients (27.1%) were lost to follow-up. In 32 patients (15.3%) a revision by spinal fusion had been performed. In 20 patients this revision had occurred ≥5 years after TDR and were included. Consequently, 141 patients were available for analysis (mean follow-up of 16.7 years). Residual-mobility was noted in 38.0%. No significant associations were observed between residual-mobility and the occurrence of ASD, or with clinical outcome. In addition, ASD and clinical outcome were not related either. Conclusions: It appears that long-term preservation of motion after TDR is met for only a third of patients. However, residual-mobility is not associated with the occurrence of ASD, and both residual-mobility and ASD do not appear to be related to long-term clinical outcome.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document