scholarly journals From Economists to Historians: Studying the Planning Commission, 1950–2014

Author(s):  
Sylvie Guichard
Keyword(s):  
1998 ◽  
Vol 22 (57) ◽  
pp. 128-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Freestone ◽  
Max Grubb

BMJ ◽  
1941 ◽  
Vol 1 (4187) ◽  
pp. 537-537
Author(s):  
K. McFadyean

BMJ ◽  
1941 ◽  
Vol 1 (4177) ◽  
pp. 131-131
Author(s):  
S. L. Simpson

BMJ ◽  
1941 ◽  
Vol 1 (4178) ◽  
pp. 171-172
Author(s):  
C. R. Gibson

2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. S183-S184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madhu Kumar Marasini ◽  
Ssansa Mugenyi

The multisectoral approach has evolved as a popular instrument to attain nutrition goals and targets. But as policy makers, we need timely, relevant, and accurate information in order to effectively support these plans. This commentary comes from the members of the nutrition secretariats at the National Planning Commission in Nepal and the Office of the Prime Minister in Uganda on availability and use of evidence and the nutrition policy cycle. As has been highlighted in this supplement, some of the challenges we have faced include tracking nutrition spending and limited human resource capacity. It will be important for countries, including our own, to take steps to ensure that all sectors with responsibility for nutrition issues adequately prioritize nutrition—as evidenced by budgets and targets—and coordinate efforts for the most efficient use of funds. Countries will also need to consider the importance of transparency and accountability at all levels, as well as planning and reporting systems to ensure better cooperation and stronger partnerships. Going forward, we call on all those working in the field of nutrition to focus on developing evidence that is useful for decision-making and that can facilitate monitoring of practical measures of governance and financing by national- and district-level stakeholders.


2008 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subir Sinha

On 2 October 1952, marking Gandhi's fourth birth anniversary after his assassination in 1948, Jawaharlal Nehru, the first prime minister of postcolonial India, launched the Community Development (CD) Programs. Dedicating the programs to Gandhi's memory allowed Nehru to claim symbolic legitimacy for them. At the same time, this centerpiece of Nehruvian policy in the Indian countryside was heavily interventionist, billed as “the method ... through which the [state] seeks to bring about social and economic transformation in India's villages” (Government of India 1952). In its heyday, CD preoccupied the Planning Commission, was linked to the office of the Prime Minister, had a ministry dedicated to it, and formed part of the domain of action of the rapidly proliferating state and other development agencies. Fifteen pilot projects, each covering 300 villages, were launched in all the major states. Planning documents of the day register high enthusiasm and optimism for these programs. However, by the mid-1960s, barely a decade after the fanfare of its launch, the tone of planners toward CD turned first despairing and then oppositional. They called for abandonment of its ambitious aim of the total development of Indian villages in favor of more focused interventions to achieve a rapid increase in food-grain production.


BMJ ◽  
1941 ◽  
Vol 1 (4199) ◽  
pp. 989-989
Author(s):  
H. H. Sanguinetti

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document