Of the Standard of Taste, No. II

2015 ◽  
pp. 276-282
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2018 (3) ◽  
pp. 184-192
Author(s):  
Li Shuren

AbstractHume is perhaps the most skeptical of all the great philosophers; and so it might reasonably have been assumed that he would have doubted the existence of a standard of taste in an area of human activity, the arts, where very many people, not ordinarily considered of a skeptical turn of mind, have doubted the existence of any standard according to his 1757 essay Of the Standard of Taste.


1995 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 371-378
Author(s):  
CHRISTOPHER PERRICONE
Keyword(s):  
The Body ◽  

1998 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 545-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Friday
Keyword(s):  

PMLA ◽  
1934 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 577-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Niles Hooker

The attempts to define and to arrive at a standard of taste lie at the heart of the aesthetic inquiries that were being carried on in eighteenth-century England. That such inquiries, by examining certain fundamental assumptions of traditional æsthetics, exerted an influence on the theory and practice of literary criticism, is a commonplace. But why and how this influence was felt has not been explained. Its importance can be gauged by the fact that within a period of twenty years several of the ablest minds in England and Scotland, including Burke, Hume, Hogarth, Reynolds, Kames, and Gerard—most of them interested in literary criticism—were focussed upon the problem of taste. It was not a coincidence that in the years from 1750 to 1770, when the search for a standard of taste was at its height, the old assumptions of literary criticism were crumbling and the new “romantic” principles were being set forth, sometimes timidly and sometimes boldly, by the Wartons, Young, Hurd, Kames, and many others. The relation between these two phenomena is the subject of this study.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document