The Dutch national guideline on palliative sedation

Author(s):  
Johan Legemaate
2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 256-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siebe J Swart ◽  
Agnes van der Heide ◽  
Tijn Brinkkemper ◽  
Lia van Zuylen ◽  
Roberto Perez ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 666-670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marian Verkerk ◽  
Eric van Wijlick ◽  
Johan Legemaate ◽  
Alexander de Graeff

2009 ◽  
Vol 169 (5) ◽  
pp. 430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeroen G. J. Hasselaar ◽  
Stans C. A. H. H. V. M. Verhagen ◽  
André P. Wolff ◽  
Yvonne Engels ◽  
Ben J. P. Crul ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric van Wijlick ◽  
Marian Verkerk ◽  
Alexander de Graeff ◽  
Johan Legemaate

AbstractIn December 2005 the first national guideline for palliative sedation in the Netherlands was published. This guideline was developed by a committee of the Royal Dutch Medical Association, at the request of the Dutch government. The guideline defines palliative sedation as 'the intentional lowering of consciousness of a patient in the last phase of his or her life'. According to the guideline the objective of palliative sedation is to relieve suffering, and lowering consciousness is a means to achieve this. It is very important that palliative sedation is given for the right indication, proportionally, and adequately. It is the degree of symptom control, not the level to which consciousness is lowered, which determines the dose and combinations of the sedatives used and duration of treatment. The assessment and decision-making processes must focus on adequate relief of the patient's suffering, so that a peaceful and acceptable situation is created. Palliative sedation is given in the last phase of life, in the imminently dying patient. Palliative sedation raises several legal questions. In this article we describe the structure and contents of the guideline, with special attention for the main legal issues involved, like the distinction between palliative sedation and euthanasia and the process of informed conesnt.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 272-279
Author(s):  
T Van Der Schueren ◽  
S Stordeur ◽  
S Mokrane ◽  
A Libois ◽  
W Vanden Berghe ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Amy Nolen ◽  
Rawaa Olwi ◽  
Selby Debbie

Background: Patients approaching end of life may experience intractable symptoms managed with palliative sedation. The legalization of Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) in Canada in 2016 offers a new option for relief of intolerable suffering, and there is limited evidence examining how the use of palliative sedation has evolved with the introduction of MAiD. Objectives: To compare rates of palliative sedation at a tertiary care hospital before and after the legalization of MAiD. Methods: This study is a retrospective chart analysis of all deaths of patients followed by the palliative care consult team in acute care, or admitted to the palliative care unit. We compared the use of palliative sedation during 1-year periods before and after the legalization of MAiD, and screened charts for MAiD requests during the second time period. Results: 4.7% (n = 25) of patients who died in the palliative care unit pre-legalization of MAiD received palliative sedation compared to 14.6% (n = 82) post-MAiD, with no change in acute care. Post-MAiD, 4.1% of deaths were medically-assisted deaths in the palliative care unit (n = 23) and acute care (n = 14). For patients who requested MAiD but instead received palliative sedation, the primary reason was loss of decisional capacity to consent for MAiD. Conclusion: We believe that the mainstream presence of MAiD has resulted in an increased recognition of MAiD and palliative sedation as distinct entities, and rates of palliative sedation increased post-MAiD due to greater awareness about patient choice and increased comfort with end-of-life options.


2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 611-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah K Edwards ◽  
Christine M Bates ◽  
Fiona Lewis ◽  
Gulshan Sethi ◽  
Deepa Grover
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document