scholarly journals ON MAXIMAL ESSENTIAL EXTENSIONS OF RINGS

2010 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 329-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. R. ANDRUSZKIEWICZ

AbstractThe main purpose of this paper is to give a new, elementary proof of Flanigan’s theorem, which says that a given ring A has a maximal essential extension ME(A) if and only if the two-sided annihilator of A is zero. Moreover, we discuss the problem of description of ME(A) for a given right ideal A of a ring with an identity.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masoud Haveshki

Abstract We define the essential extension of a filter in the residuated lattice A associated to an ideal of L(A) and investigate its related properties. We prove the residuated lattice A is a Boolean algebra, G(RL)-algebra or MV -algebra if and only if the essential extension of {1} associated to A \ P is a Boolean filter, G-filter or MV -filter (for all P ∈ SpecA), respectively. Also, some properties of lattice of essential extensions are studied.


2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (05) ◽  
pp. 1550068
Author(s):  
Papiya Bhattacharjee ◽  
Michelle L. Knox

Essential extensions and p-extensions have been studied for commutative rings with identity in various papers, such as [P. Bhattacharjee, M. L. Knox and W. Wm. McGovern, p-Extensions, Proceedings for the OSU-Denison Conference, AMS series Contemporary Mathematics Series (to appear); p-Embeddings, Topology Appl. 160(13) (2013) 1566–1576; R. M. Raphael, Algebraic Extensions of Commutative Regular Rings, Canad. J. Math. 22(6) (1970) 1133–1155]. The present paper applies these concepts to certain subrings of C(X). Moreover, the paper introduces a new ring extension, called a pg-extension, and determines its relation to both essential extension and p-extension. It turns out that the pg-extension R ↪ S induces a well-defined contraction map between principal ideals [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text].


1972 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 573-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia Wiegand

The purpose of this paper is to exploit an analogy between algebraic extensions of fields and essential extensions of modules, in which the role of the algebraic closure of a field F is played by the injective hull H(M) of a unitary left R-module M. (The notion of * ‘algebraic’ extensions of general algebraic systems has been studied by Shoda; see, for example [5].)In this analogy, the role of a polynomial p(x) is played by a homomorphism of R-modules(1)which will be called an ideal homomorphism into M. The process of solving the equation p(x) = 0 in F, or in an algebraic extension of F, will be replaced by the process of extending an ideal homomorphism (1) to a homomorphism F* from R into M, or into an essential extension of M.


1981 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rudolf-E. Hoffmann

AbstractIn the category of T1 -spaces and continuous maps, every space X has a unique maximal essential extension. X has an injective hull iff card X≤1.


1988 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 243-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. R. Goodearl ◽  
D. A. Jordan

In an earlier paper [4] we considered the question of whether an injective module E over a noncommutative ring R remains injective after localization with respect to a denominator set X in R. A related question is whether, given an essential extension N of an R-module M, the localization N[X–1] must be an essential extension of M[X–1]. In [1] it is shown that if R is left noetherian and X is central in R, then localization at X preserves both injectivity and essential extensions of left R-modules and, hence, preserves injective hulls and minimal injective resolutions.


2005 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 351-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huaxin Lin

AbstractLet A be an amenable separable C*-algebra and B be a non-unital but σ-unital simple C*- algebra with continuous scale. We show that two essential extensions τ1 and τ2 of A by B are approximately unitarily equivalent if and only ifIf A is assumed to satisfy the Universal Coefficient Theorem, there is a bijection fromapproximate unitary equivalence classes of the abovementioned extensions to KL(A,M(B)/B). Using KL(A,M(B)/B), we compute exactly when an essential extension is quasidiagonal. We show that quasidiagonal extensions may not be approximately trivial. We also study the approximately trivial extensions.


2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (07) ◽  
pp. 1450038 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Tamer Koşan ◽  
Truong Cong Quynh

For a ring R, there are classical facts that R is right Noetherian if and only if every direct sum of injective right R-modules is injective, and R is right Noetherian if and only if every essential extension of a direct sum of injective hulls of simple right R-modules is a direct sum of injective right R-modules. In this paper, we prove that R is right Noetherian if and only if every essential extension of a direct sum of injective hulls of simple right R-modules is a direct sum of either injective right R-modules or projective right R-modules.


1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 356-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia'an Yan
Keyword(s):  

1926 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 97-99
Author(s):  
Matsusaburô Fujiwara
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document