Distribution of Income and Wealth in Ontario: Theory and EvidenceC. M. Beach D. E. Card F. Flatters Toronto: University of Toronto Press (for the Ontario Economic Council), 1981, pp. ix, 389 - The Redistribution of Income in CanadaW. Irwin Gillespie Toronto: Gage Publishing Limited (for the Institute of Canadian Studies, Carleton University), 1980, pp. vii, 214 - Class Tells: On Social Inequality in CanadaAlfred A. Hunter Toronto: Butterworths, 1981, pp. ix, 264 - Inequality: Essays on the Political Economy of Social WelfareAllan Moscovitch and Glenn Drover eds. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1981, pp. ix, 386 - Economic Inequality in CanadaLars Ogsberg Toronto: Butterworths, 1981, pp. vii, 236

1982 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 408-410
Author(s):  
Douglas J. Mccready
Author(s):  
Susanne Karstedt

Prisons across the globe are manifestations of inequality. In any society, its most marginalised groups are overrepresented in prisons and all institutions of criminal justice. Notwithstanding this universal condition of contemporary criminal justice, the link between social inequality and inequality of punishment has been found to be tenuous and elusive. This contribution addresses the question how socio-economic inequality shapes the manifestations of punishment for a global sample of countries. As socio-economic inequality and criminal punishment are both multi-faceted concepts, several indicators are used for each. The findings confirm the highly contextual nature of the link between inequality and criminal punishment; they suggest a variegated impact of political economies, and a multiplicity of mechanisms that link inequality and criminal punishment across the globe.


2004 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 747-748
Author(s):  
Candace Johnson

Gendered States: Women, Unemployment Insurance, and the Political Economy of the Welfare State in Canada, 1945–1997, Ann Porter, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2003, pp. 355It is amazing that Canadian society has been consistently bewildered as to the social, political and economic placement of women. In her new book, Ann Porter explains that the labour requirement that enabled women's participation in the workforce during the Second World War created a post-war environment that was inequitable, illogical, gendered, and “regulating.” Thus, progressive measures were to produce regressive results, as they were taken for the sake of nationalism and not gender equality. Porter documents the change in Unemployment Insurance (UI) policy from limited coverage for certain groups of male workers that could not engage in productive labour to “site of contestation over women's entitlement to state benefits” (66).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document