II.—Radio-activity and the Earth's Thermal History

1915 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 60-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur Holmes

Two years ago, in discussing the thermal energy of the earth, I suggested that while it had become impossible to deduce the earth's age from its thermal condition alone, Kelvin's problem might profitably be reversed by accepting the earth's age as a known factor, and deducing with its help the thermal history of the earth. This paper is a first attempt to attack the new problem then suggested. For geological purposes, one of the most fundamental aspects of the problem is that relating to the depth within the earth's crust at which temperatures are attained such that, under suitable conditions of pressure, molten rock magmas may exist. The determination of the minimum depth of possible rock fusion is a first essential to any adequate theory of vulcanism, and indeed of igneous activity in general. It is not sufficient, however, to ascertain that depth for present conditions alone, its variation during the earth's geological history must also be investigated ; for if, as is generally believed, the earth is a cooling body, the depth must be slowly increasing, and in former periods it must necessarily have been nearer the surface than it is now. In the limiting conditions both of position and time, tlie depth of fusion may have been at, or so near as to be for all practical purposes at, the surface itself. That is to say, at the beginning of geological history the earth may have been in a molten condition at, or immediately below, the then existing surface

1925 ◽  
Vol 62 (12) ◽  
pp. 529-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur Holmes

In Part IV of this paper the theory that the earth has continuously cooled down from a former molten state was shown to lead to limitations of temperature and to a distribution of rock-types at moderate depths which, taken together, made it impossible for igneous activity to have taken place as we know it to have done. It was argued that this conclusion definitely proved the theory to be wrong. Now, instead of deducing the distribution of rock-types in depth from their radioactive contents, the method of attack will be reversed and an attempt will be made to determine the downward distribution independently, so that the radioactive effects may be deduced without reference to any limiting hypothesis of a steadily cooling earth.


Nature ◽  
1956 ◽  
Vol 177 (4500) ◽  
pp. 155-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. JACOBS ◽  
D. W. ALLAN
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 293-331
Author(s):  
GIAN BATTISTA VAI

Anniversaries for the two founding fathers of geology occurring in the same year prompted a comparative evaluation of how the two contributed to establishing the basic principles of the discipline. To do so, passages from their publications, codices and manuscripts have been quoted directly. The Stenonian principles (‘original horizontality’, ‘original continuity’, and ‘superposition of individual strata’) are present in Leonardo’s notebooks amazingly formulated, using similar wording when studying the same area more than 150 years earlier. Also, Stenonian priority in naming and explaining geological concepts and processes (e.g., faulting, folding, angular unconformity, relative chronology) are mirrored in Leonardo’s writings and pictorial works. While Steno enjoys priority in stepwise restoration of the geological history of a given region, Leonardo was the first to construct a 3D geological profile representation and geomorphologic maps. Lastly, the paper focuses on diverging stances of the two savants about the Noachian Deluge and the age of the Earth. Already 500 years ago, Leonardo had solved the question of marine fossil remains of organic origin found in the mountains implying the possibility of deep geologic time in a statement of ‘eternalism’. 350 years ago, Steno solved the same question in a different way in which he retained a basic role for the Deluge and assumed a short age for the Earth by focusing mainly on short-lived sedimentary and geomorphologic processes.


Most of the minerals on the Moon’s surface contain iron as a major constituent, and this enables them to be examined by Mossbauer spectroscopy. The advantages and limitations of this technique for examining lunar samples will be briefly mentioned, before reviewing the results so far obtained on material returned by the Apollo and Luna missions. By far the greatest proportion of iron is present as Fe(II) or Fe(0), and no appreciable concentration of Fe(III) has been observed. The relative amounts of iron-containing minerals at the various lunar sites have been determined and related to the lunar geological features. The more detailed determination of the distribution of iron between the M1 and M2 sites in pyroxene minerals leads to information on the thermal history of the rocks. Likewise the presence of superparamagnetic iron particles within the surface layers of some of the soil particles provides significant evidence concerning their origin and subsequent history.


1970 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 326-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.N. Tikhonov ◽  
E.A. Lubimova ◽  
V.K. Vlasov
Keyword(s):  

1865 ◽  
Vol 2 (17) ◽  
pp. 498-501
Author(s):  
D. Mackintosh

In the midst of a comparatively tame and highly cultivated plain of New Red Sandstone near the centre of England, there rises up a part of the under crust of the earth which presents so much the appearance of an island as to lead the imagination at once to those remote ages when its porphyritic Peaks and Syenitic Knolls were surrounded by the sea. The geological history of this celebrated spot has been skilfully unravelled by Professors Sedgwick and Jukes (Article in Potters's Charnwood Forest); the Rev. W. H. Coleman (Article in White'Directory); Mr. Edward Hull (Memoirs of Geol. Survey); and others.


Nature ◽  
1934 ◽  
Vol 133 (3363) ◽  
pp. 574-575
Author(s):  
J. H. J. POOLE
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document