Memoirs of the Geological Survey of England and Wales. (London, E. Stanford, and of all booksellers.) - 1. The Geology of the Country around Southampton (Explanation of Sheet 315). By Clement Reid, F.R.S.; with contributions by W. Whitaker, F.R.S. 8vo ; pp. 70, with illustrations of Chalk and London Clay fossils, also Palæolithic implements and geological sections. (1902. Price 1s. 6d.) - 2. The Geology of the Country around Exeter (Explanation of Sheet 25). By W. A. E. Ussher, F.G.S.; with Notes on the Petrology of the Igneous Rocks by J. J. H. Teall, M.A., F.R.S. 8vo; pp. 122, with 20 Illustrations in the text. (1902. Price 2s.) - 3. The Geology of the Country around Ringwood (Explanation of Sheet 314). By Clement Reid, F.R.S.; with contributions by F. J. Bennett, F.G.S., and E. E. L. Dixon, B.Sc., F.G.S. 8vo ; pp. 62, with 4 Illustrations in text. (1902. Price 1s. Price of Sheet 314 and a colour-printed map of the Ringwood district, 1s. 6d.) - 4. Summary of Progress of the Geological Survey of the United Kingdom and of the Museum of Practical Geology for 1901. 8vo; pp. 220, with 7 Illustrations. (London, 1902. Price 1s.)

1902 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 524-526
1898 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 103-106
Author(s):  
Grenville A. J. Cole

When recently examining a series of igneous rocks for the Geological Survey of the United Kingdom, I required a ready method for the determination of potassium in the felspars, whether they occurred as porphyritic crystals or as microlites in the groundmass. The ordinary flame-reaction has always been recognized as unsatisfactory in the presence of sodium, and the use of blue glass has been long recommended, of a sufficient thickness to cut off a sodium flame, the potassium flame then coming through alone.


Until 2019, TBE was considered only to be an imported disease to the United Kingdom. In that year, evidence became available that the TBEV is likely circulating in the country1,2 and a first “probable case” of TBE originating in the UK was reported.3 In addition to TBEV, louping ill virus (LIV), a member of the TBEV-serocomplex, is also endemic in parts of the UK. Reports of clinical disease caused by LIV in livestock are mainly from Scotland, parts of North and South West England and Wales.4


2003 ◽  
Vol 7 (48) ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  

The Health Protection Agency Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre for England and Wales and others have reported that the number of people living with HIV in the UK has increased


1902 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 385-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. T. Newton

The history of this gigantic rodent began to be written in 1809, when M. Gothelf Fischer described a skull from a sandy deposit on the borders of the Sea of Azof, to which he gave the name of Trogontherium. Since then, at varying intervals, to the present time, new chapters have been added to this history by both Continental and British workers, describing specimens of a more or less fragmentary character which have from time to time been discovered. The English specimens have been chiefly obtained from the ‘Cromer Forest Bed,’ that rich and remarkable series of beds occupying a position in time between the Crags and the Glacial deposits of East Anglia. The ‘Forest Bed’ specimens were first made known by Sir Charles Lyell in 1840, but were more fully described by Sir R. Owen in 1846 and referred to Fischer's Trogontherium Cuvieri. It will not be necessary at this time to refer specifically to each of the additions to our knowledge of this animal or to detail the varying opinions as to affinities and nomenclature, as these particulars will be found in the Memoirs of the Geological Survey of the United Kingdom. Although most of the British specimens of Trogontherium Cuvieri have been found in the ‘Cromer Forest Bed’ a few examples have been met with in the Norwich and Weybourn Crags. The smaller species, which has been called T. minus, was obtained from the nodule bed below the Red Crag of Felixstowe, and an incisor tooth from the Norwich Crag was referred to the same species.


1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
B W Ilbery ◽  
I R Bowler

The Farm Diversification Grant Scheme, introduced in the United Kingdom in 1988, encourages farmers to diversify their business activities on the farm. In this paper, the Scheme is described and both the ‘farm’ and ‘farmer’ characteristics of a sample of ‘adopters’ and ‘nonadopters’ in England and Wales are examined as well as the reasons for adoption and nonadoption. The results indicate that adopters are drawn from larger farms, those with higher incomes and levels of borrowing, the younger, better educated farmers, and from farms where spouses are more actively involved in developing the business. Considerable resistance towards diversification was found among nonadopters, who have still to be convinced of the financial viability of this type of business development; to many, it is just not farming.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document